Gay Patriot Header Image

Obama’s National Security Policy (in a nutshell)

“. . .moral sanctimoniousness and a determination to do the opposite of whatever George W. Bush was doing.”

Jennifer Rubin



  1. Isn’t it funny. That is, almost word for word, what the general assessment of George Bush’s approach was, relative to Clinton.

    Which is why the whole Arab-Israel peace process was never followed up on after Taba, why Richard Clarke’s admonitions about Al-Qaeda were backburnered. I think we have some real projection going on here.

    Especially when, on odd numbered days I guess, the message from the right is that Obama is simply adopting the Bush policies, such as the embrace of Petrean surges, following up on the Bush opening to Iran and the like….

    and given his Republican national security director, and keeping Bush’s defense secretary…I don’t know,,,,seems like a really weak case for Ms Rubin.

    Sounds to me that she is simply interested in hurling the insult du jour.

    Comment by Tano — December 20, 2009 @ 7:06 pm - December 20, 2009

  2. Was it, Tano? Please provide your evidence. In your 2nd ¶, you just offer a string of left-wing talking points easily reputed.

    But, thanks for you help again. You do prove that your purpose on this blog is to serve as kind of professional naysayer.

    Comment by B. Daniel Blatt — December 20, 2009 @ 7:18 pm - December 20, 2009

  3. I thought all leftists were still caught in Copen HAG en in the snow blizzard celebrating GLOBAL WARMING. hehe

    Comment by Gene in Pennsylvania — December 20, 2009 @ 8:39 pm - December 20, 2009

  4. why Richard Clarke’s admonitions about Al-Qaeda were backburnered.

    You mean the guy who made the decision to let the Saudis split town?

    Comment by ThatGayConservative — December 21, 2009 @ 1:37 am - December 21, 2009

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.