<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bye, Bayh?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:15:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/comment-page-1/#comment-526794</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20488#comment-526794</guid>
		<description>Always liked Bayh, until Obamacare.  I think he&#039;s vulnerable.  Hoosiers are not happy.  Pence would be a great challenger if they could get him to run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always liked Bayh, until Obamacare.  I think he&#8217;s vulnerable.  Hoosiers are not happy.  Pence would be a great challenger if they could get him to run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/comment-page-1/#comment-526722</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20488#comment-526722</guid>
		<description>I live in Indiana and I would campaign--HARD--for a decent candidate who challenged Bayh.  

He&#039;s not that smart and he&#039;s a pansy.  AND I suspect he would like to run for president.  GAWD!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Indiana and I would campaign&#8211;HARD&#8211;for a decent candidate who challenged Bayh.  </p>
<p>He&#8217;s not that smart and he&#8217;s a pansy.  AND I suspect he would like to run for president.  GAWD!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tano</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/comment-page-1/#comment-526655</link>
		<dc:creator>Tano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20488#comment-526655</guid>
		<description>I am going to guess that the odds of Bayh losing are about the same as the odds that the GOP will pick up 80 seats in the House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to guess that the odds of Bayh losing are about the same as the odds that the GOP will pick up 80 seats in the House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/comment-page-1/#comment-526627</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20488#comment-526627</guid>
		<description>Dave:

You are correct. I just noticed how many typo&#039;s I had in my original post, and apologize for that. You are 100% correct that Republicans will try to keep Voinovich&#039;s seat since to even have a chance at making significant in-road&#039;s in the Senate, they will not be able to lose any of the seats they currently hold. 

As for Hostettler, I think most people  assumed that Bayh would cruise to victory, and the door has just been thrown open to take him out. However, I have to agree with your assessment about Hostettler&#039;s chances. Without money, and solid support within the state, his chances do not seem to be that great unless Bayh continues to vote for the liberal agenda (like cap-and-trade and immigration reform).

So, the RNC would be better off trying to defend Voinovich&#039;s seat and Bunning&#039;s seat. And, we cannot forget that the Roy Blunt/Carnahan race will be pretty tough as well. So, replacing Bayh might have to be put on the back-burner. 

I just hope that the RNC does not ignore the Northeast. They have a chance to keep Gregg&#039;s seat, and pick-up seats in Pennsylvania, Delaware, Connecticut, and even New York (assuming Giuliani runs against Gillinbrand). There are a lot of Republicans in this area, and as Governor-elect Christie showed, Republicans can make in-roads in this part of the country. 

And Daniel, yes there are other candidates running. However, it seems like Hostettler is emerging as the favorite. Although, if polling shows that Bayh is vulnerable, I suspect that other candidates might jump into the race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave:</p>
<p>You are correct. I just noticed how many typo&#8217;s I had in my original post, and apologize for that. You are 100% correct that Republicans will try to keep Voinovich&#8217;s seat since to even have a chance at making significant in-road&#8217;s in the Senate, they will not be able to lose any of the seats they currently hold. </p>
<p>As for Hostettler, I think most people  assumed that Bayh would cruise to victory, and the door has just been thrown open to take him out. However, I have to agree with your assessment about Hostettler&#8217;s chances. Without money, and solid support within the state, his chances do not seem to be that great unless Bayh continues to vote for the liberal agenda (like cap-and-trade and immigration reform).</p>
<p>So, the RNC would be better off trying to defend Voinovich&#8217;s seat and Bunning&#8217;s seat. And, we cannot forget that the Roy Blunt/Carnahan race will be pretty tough as well. So, replacing Bayh might have to be put on the back-burner. </p>
<p>I just hope that the RNC does not ignore the Northeast. They have a chance to keep Gregg&#8217;s seat, and pick-up seats in Pennsylvania, Delaware, Connecticut, and even New York (assuming Giuliani runs against Gillinbrand). There are a lot of Republicans in this area, and as Governor-elect Christie showed, Republicans can make in-roads in this part of the country. </p>
<p>And Daniel, yes there are other candidates running. However, it seems like Hostettler is emerging as the favorite. Although, if polling shows that Bayh is vulnerable, I suspect that other candidates might jump into the race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Daniel Blatt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/comment-page-1/#comment-526566</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20488#comment-526566</guid>
		<description>You Hoosiers would know this better than I.  Isn&#039;t Hostettler part of a larger field and there are others running for the GOP nomination?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Hoosiers would know this better than I.  Isn&#8217;t Hostettler part of a larger field and there are others running for the GOP nomination?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave N.</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/comment-page-1/#comment-526559</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20488#comment-526559</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Bayh&#039;s seat is in Indiana. I am sure the Republicans will be spending quite a bit of money in Ohio, defending Voinovich&#039;s seat (Voinovich is retiring).

Your comment about Hostettler is more prescient. He never ran particularly strong in his Congressional district nor was a particularly strong fundraiser. This contrasts quite sharply with Dan Quayle, who was both.

Bottom line, I don&#039;t think Hostettler has what it takes to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Bayh&#8217;s seat is in Indiana. I am sure the Republicans will be spending quite a bit of money in Ohio, defending Voinovich&#8217;s seat (Voinovich is retiring).</p>
<p>Your comment about Hostettler is more prescient. He never ran particularly strong in his Congressional district nor was a particularly strong fundraiser. This contrasts quite sharply with Dan Quayle, who was both.</p>
<p>Bottom line, I don&#8217;t think Hostettler has what it takes to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/comment-page-1/#comment-526523</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20488#comment-526523</guid>
		<description>The question is not whether he is vulnerable - the quesion is whether there is a viable candidate to challenge him. Hostettler lost a re-election bid last year, and is going up a candidate that already has almost 13 million dollars. So, can he raise money and pose a viable threat? 

Also, the question will be how much the RNC wants to invest in Ohio. There is a real opportunity to pick up 4 seats in the Northeast, and the the RNC might want to make in-roads in states like Pennsylvania and Connecticut more than in Ohio - a state that is usually a pretty solid republican state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is not whether he is vulnerable &#8211; the quesion is whether there is a viable candidate to challenge him. Hostettler lost a re-election bid last year, and is going up a candidate that already has almost 13 million dollars. So, can he raise money and pose a viable threat? </p>
<p>Also, the question will be how much the RNC wants to invest in Ohio. There is a real opportunity to pick up 4 seats in the Northeast, and the the RNC might want to make in-roads in states like Pennsylvania and Connecticut more than in Ohio &#8211; a state that is usually a pretty solid republican state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/comment-page-1/#comment-526505</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20488#comment-526505</guid>
		<description>Starting today, the people of Indiana will be gearing up to remove the Senator.  Tea Party Style..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starting today, the people of Indiana will be gearing up to remove the Senator.  Tea Party Style..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HSmith</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/comment-page-1/#comment-526482</link>
		<dc:creator>HSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20488#comment-526482</guid>
		<description>Senator Bayh Humbug is gone from the Senate if there is anything I can do to make it happen. I was pretty happy with him as Governor, but despite &quot;moderate&quot; noices he makes in the Senate, he nearly always lines up with the radicals (meaning the national leadership) of the Democrat party at the expense of his less radical Indiana constituents. I mean, seriously, who thinks of Indiana when some says &quot;radical?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Bayh Humbug is gone from the Senate if there is anything I can do to make it happen. I was pretty happy with him as Governor, but despite &#8220;moderate&#8221; noices he makes in the Senate, he nearly always lines up with the radicals (meaning the national leadership) of the Democrat party at the expense of his less radical Indiana constituents. I mean, seriously, who thinks of Indiana when some says &#8220;radical?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkJ</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/comment-page-1/#comment-526474</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20488#comment-526474</guid>
		<description>Evan Bayh, I&#039;m ashamed to say, is one of my senators. I tried to call last night before the vote, but his voicemail box &quot;was full.&quot; Yeah, right. I guess he was too busy off screwing the rest of the country.

Bayh&#039;s involvement in this abortion of a bill is going to come back and haunt him like the Ghost of Christmas Past. Couldn&#039;t happen to a &quot;nicer guy,&quot; huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan Bayh, I&#8217;m ashamed to say, is one of my senators. I tried to call last night before the vote, but his voicemail box &#8220;was full.&#8221; Yeah, right. I guess he was too busy off screwing the rest of the country.</p>
<p>Bayh&#8217;s involvement in this abortion of a bill is going to come back and haunt him like the Ghost of Christmas Past. Couldn&#8217;t happen to a &#8220;nicer guy,&#8221; huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/21/bye-bayh/comment-page-1/#comment-526472</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20488#comment-526472</guid>
		<description>TPM is reporting that the Democrats&#039; plan is to run against Bush in 2010. Because America just hated it when unemployment was 5% and the deficit was only $200 Billion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TPM is reporting that the Democrats&#8217; plan is to run against Bush in 2010. Because America just hated it when unemployment was 5% and the deficit was only $200 Billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

