Comments on: The Coercive Policy and Special Interest Politics of Obamacare

By: The_Livewire

The_Livewire — Fri, 25 Dec 2009 01:51:44 +0000

Here we go... Planned Parenthood lying to a patient Bonus: Obama being pro-infanticide Discussion about planned parenthood. More Planned PArenthood hijinks here.

By: The_Livewire

The_Livewire — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:44:30 +0000

I’ll find the links when I get home. It doesn’t amaze me anymore when a conversation is taped of PP staff saying they’ll abort black babies, no problem.

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses, we’ll abort and sterilize them on the cheep. Our founder would want no less.”

By: ThatGayConservative

ThatGayConservative — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:25:24 +0000

I’m proud to say I have not.

By: The_Livewire

The_Livewire — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:36:09 +0000

TGC,

That answer’s as easy to answer as Eugenics. You have seen the Planned Parenthood films haven’t you?

By: ThatGayConservative

ThatGayConservative — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:58:20 +0000

Similarly, I keep wondering that if higher taxes is the route to economic stability, why in the hell would you support the slaughter of millions of children??? Seems to me the liberals need them, especially since at least some of them would become the dreaded “rich”. Maybe that’s why they support abortion so none of them ever have the chance to “accidentally” become self-reliant and well to do.

But, I suppose, the plan now is to outsource taxes and elections to the illegals. That way you don’t have to put up with 18 years of crumb crunchers under your feet preventing you from going to the bars or attending Jennings’ fisting parties.

By: ThatGayConservative

ThatGayConservative — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:03:40 +0000

I went to WolframAlpha.com and found that, at the rate of two every 10 minutes, 420,400 will die while waiting for ObamaCareless. Of course they’ll have to start paying taxes for it next year. Ergo, they’ll be paying money and dying before they get the benefit of it.

Tano and the liberals are soooo worried about health care, they’re willing to sacrifice almost half a million people.

Another snag is that Granny said that those 2 people every 10 minutes die without HEALTH CARE, not insurance.

By: The_Livewire

The_Livewire — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:53:20 +0000

Hmm, maybe this is why Tano's not been online?

By: B. Daniel Blatt

B. Daniel Blatt — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:47:05 +0000

TGC, excellent point, hadn’t thought of it that way, but then I don’t think like a liberal. If the current system is makin’ ‘em die, shouldn’t it be changed right away!

By: ThatGayConservative

ThatGayConservative — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:34:17 +0000

C’mon Tano. Why are the liberals willing to let 400,000+ people die before this takes effect? Surely you have the lying points memorized.

By: StraightAussie

StraightAussie — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:21:17 +0000

who will have the right to sue and take this to the Supreme Court on the grounds that it is unconstitutional.

I am an Australian citizen and I feel sorry for all of my American friends in seeing this piece of crap rammed down your throats.

By: Steven E. Kalbach

Steven E. Kalbach — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:30:02 +0000

Oh my, so sad! Not, really.

By: Steven E. Kalbach

Steven E. Kalbach — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:17:03 +0000

Harry doesn’t understand history or congress, the reason the 14th amendment came into being was to make it harder for a future congress to repealing the Civil Rights act of 1866. If he thinks he can write something into a bill and demand a future congress to obey him, he’s a nut. Were past congresses obligated to Harry? No. Neither are future congresses and why I always so, no future congress is obligated to the promises of another. Perhaps, Harry should have tried to go the amendment route first; but then, that route has the potential of enshrining all kinds of restraints on congress. Something despots don’t like.

By: ILoveCapitalism

ILoveCapitalism — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:07:54 +0000

An “aside”? Griffith’s comments on ObamaGreidPelosiCare are highly relevant:

“I want to make it perfectly clear that his bill is bad for our doctors, our patients and will have unintended consequences far beyond what we know today,” he said. “As a doctor and as a [newly minted] Republican, I plan to once again oppose this measure and hope that we can defeat this bill that is a major threat to our nation.”

Yay!

By: Steven E. Kalbach

Steven E. Kalbach — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:00:52 +0000

This is an interesting aside House Dem blames leaders for party switch how many more I wonder?

By: Greg Blum

Greg Blum — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:47:37 +0000

When the details of the legislation do not add up to the STATED goal of the legislation (reduce the cost of health care, expand availability of health insurance), one starts to look at the ulterior motives. The payouts to trial lawyers is a HUGE red flag. As for the “none of you guys can change this later” clause, it reminds me of using the genie’s third wish to ask for three more wishes.

By: ILoveCapitalism

ILoveCapitalism — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:11:44 +0000

The Medicare cuts are one good thing. But the rest of the bill is fascism. The federal mandate, forcing people to spend money on insurance, is un-American (that is, unprecedented in American history) and surely unconstitutional; but the Democratic political class stopped caring about the Constitution’s limits and restrictions on government power, decades ago.

I wonder if young people, when slapped with the mandate, will ‘make the connection’ that it was Democrats who slapped them?