With the first negative ad of the Massachusetts Senate race, Martha Coakley likens Rush Limbaugh to a Nazi and leaves out one important issue that her Republican opponent opposes.
Can you guess what it is? And what it says about the pet issue of the man she seeks to succeed. Oops, I gave away the answer, so I’d better add it in as one of the post’s categories.
(Via Red Mass Group.)
And don’t forget to see how Coakley’s slide in the polls has caused national Democrats to obsess over Sarah Palin’s silence. “How humiliating,” John Hinderaker writes, “for the Democrats! Sarah Palin can twist them into knots simply by doing…nothing.”
UPDATE: Scott Brown is already fighting back with a new ad, but he’s not following the Democrat into the gutter, he’s following in the footsteps of a successful Democratic campaign against an old kind of politics. Given this Republican’s record, it doesn’t much look like he’ll follow in that Democrat’s footsteps once elected.
I love it! Palin does not present herself in Massachusetts to give the Coakley campaign a target and the Democrats are teed off. (As if any Palin strategy would have Massachusetts as a “must-win” state to take the presidency.)
Brown is wiping up the Coakley advantage quite handily without any help from McCain, Trent Lott, Dan Quayle, or Herbert Hoover. I am sure the democrats would also like to run against them as well. However, they are stuck with Scott Brown.
Coakley can’t even spell the name of the state she wants to represent in the senate.
http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2010/01/doh-coakley-ad-attacking-brown.html
Vote for Brown, he can spell!