<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Chuckie Get a Challenger?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/22/will-chuckie-get-a-challenger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/22/will-chuckie-get-a-challenger/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:49:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean A</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/22/will-chuckie-get-a-challenger/comment-page-1/#comment-539885</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=21702#comment-539885</guid>
		<description>Speaking of the insufferable, elitist douche bag Chuck Schumer, who could forget his stirring argument in favor of reviving the Fairness Doctrine--pornography is &quot;speech&quot; and we regulate that, so we should regulate talk radio too.  Worthless.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htD_-A7pDhw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of the insufferable, elitist douche bag Chuck Schumer, who could forget his stirring argument in favor of reviving the Fairness Doctrine&#8211;pornography is &#8220;speech&#8221; and we regulate that, so we should regulate talk radio too.  Worthless.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htD_-A7pDhw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htD_-A7pDhw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MFS</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/22/will-chuckie-get-a-challenger/comment-page-1/#comment-539749</link>
		<dc:creator>MFS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=21702#comment-539749</guid>
		<description>It would be tough sledding.  I left New York State three weeks after he was first elected. (Actually, I worked on Al D&#039;Amato&#039;s campaign.)

The people in New York &lt;i&gt;adore&lt;/i&gt; Chuck Schumer!  Anyone who thought otherwise, like me, just packed up and left.

Not to rain on anyone&#039;s parade, but we&#039;ll see a thriving Haiti before we see another thriving Empire State.

Best wishes,
-MFS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be tough sledding.  I left New York State three weeks after he was first elected. (Actually, I worked on Al D&#8217;Amato&#8217;s campaign.)</p>
<p>The people in New York <i>adore</i> Chuck Schumer!  Anyone who thought otherwise, like me, just packed up and left.</p>
<p>Not to rain on anyone&#8217;s parade, but we&#8217;ll see a thriving Haiti before we see another thriving Empire State.</p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
-MFS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chad</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/22/will-chuckie-get-a-challenger/comment-page-1/#comment-539728</link>
		<dc:creator>chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=21702#comment-539728</guid>
		<description>Most people think Gillibrand is the easier to senator to pick off, and that would be tough enough.  But flipping both of NY&#039;s senate seats in one year?  That&#039;s delusional.  Sort of like thinking we&#039;d elect a Republican senator to replace Ted Kennedy.

If we could win a seat in Massachusetts, one in Connecticut, and two in New York (and presumably a decent number in less surprisingly places, like Nevada, North Dakota, Colorado, and Indiana) and flip the House at the same time, would 2010 be the GOP&#039;s best year ever?

Anyway, here&#039;s hoping that November 2 is a lot like January 19.  Best way to make that happen?  Run fiscally conservative, government-is-not-the-solution-government-is-the-problem Republicans everywhere.  Some of them should be social conservatives, some, not so much.  One can&#039;t say that being socially conservative or socially moderate is a net plus in general; it depends too much on the state/district.  The common thread that I think should run through all candidates is a push back against the big government liberalism AND the big government conservatism that have plagued America for a number of years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people think Gillibrand is the easier to senator to pick off, and that would be tough enough.  But flipping both of NY&#8217;s senate seats in one year?  That&#8217;s delusional.  Sort of like thinking we&#8217;d elect a Republican senator to replace Ted Kennedy.</p>
<p>If we could win a seat in Massachusetts, one in Connecticut, and two in New York (and presumably a decent number in less surprisingly places, like Nevada, North Dakota, Colorado, and Indiana) and flip the House at the same time, would 2010 be the GOP&#8217;s best year ever?</p>
<p>Anyway, here&#8217;s hoping that November 2 is a lot like January 19.  Best way to make that happen?  Run fiscally conservative, government-is-not-the-solution-government-is-the-problem Republicans everywhere.  Some of them should be social conservatives, some, not so much.  One can&#8217;t say that being socially conservative or socially moderate is a net plus in general; it depends too much on the state/district.  The common thread that I think should run through all candidates is a push back against the big government liberalism AND the big government conservatism that have plagued America for a number of years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

