i attached comments on a different topic altogether b/c there was no post about that particular topic, and thus there was no appropriate place to post such comments

That might be a worthwhile point if your post was just to ask a question about said different topic. But it wasn’t.

Your post was an attack on Dan for daring to notice Reich’s stupidity on this blog without having said anything about Obama’s self-love fest before the Republicans:

yawn… awfully curious… this ostensibly political blog… not liking what you saw?

As if the fact that Clinton’s labor secretary and one of the American Left’s leading intellectuals is a moron isn’t worth mentioning on an “ostensibly political blog.”

If this were my web log I’d ban you PDQ for your obnoxious idiocy. Then no one would have to worry about whether or not you “spend much time on this blog anymore.”

PS: It’s amusing to see Dan called dense by someone who can’t bother to use capitalization in his comments.

you write like a third grader.

Says the ass who hasn’t found the SHIFT key yet.

We know you think black people are inferior and can’t function without your plantation kindness. But how do you expect the black child to ever grow up and learn to be a functional adult if you continue to coddle him and treat him like a baby?

I made mention earlier of Reich’s major attempt to falsely accuse Fox News….. scroll down, it’s #2 in the commentary of your last thread about O’Keefe.

You settled the discussion with:

FoxNews Derangement Syndrome has long since joined Palin Derangement Syndrome and Bush Derangement Syndrome as conditions afflicting the angry left.

There is little more to be said other than the diagnosis when it comes to a derangement syndrome.

The benchmark of Democrats being willing to accept any outrage in defense of their party is the Clinton-Lewinsky repeated obscenity in the Oval Office.

Any party that cannot even shame its own worst offenders is not likely to show any fidelity for the truth or simple decency when it comes to slinging mud at its political enemies.

You may have noted that the first comment above is from a party hack and tool who used your post to slam Republicans. bob, gillie, ian,PeeJ, Tano, Bozo and son of Bambi are not going to give your concept a free run in discussion. Their job is to throw a brick in the crowd and set their random insult machine on “absurd.”

You have a good point if you would encourage the rest of us to pay them what their comments are worth.

After all, since you fully support and endorse that, it seems odd that you would be complaining about what people call Black Narcissist.

The one “presidential” remark that should be remembered from the Baltimore meeting comes when Obama suggests if the GOP continues to disagree with him in a way he doesn’t like, then as he puts it, “you guys don’t have a lot of room to negotiate with me.”

That one phrase speaks volumes, and exemplifies the arrogance of this president. 2012 will arrive none to soon for me.

Token

Black Narcissist

Nope, no racists here, nosirree. Can’t stop thinking about black something or other being shoved down your throat, eh?

I think they decided that it wasn’t worth trying to explain the difference between a withholding change and a tax cut to someone who couldn’t even understand basic math.

Aw, make it the one major point.

Expected by whom? Not by the GØP. Not by FAUX, one suspects, as they tucked tail and cut out early.

No wonder I stopped coming here. (…… ) Comment by gillie — January 30, 2010 @ 9:38 am – January 30, 2010

god you are dense.

I didn’t comment yet.