CORPSEman
Pauk EEE stan
Tal EEEE baun
Copen HAUG en
and they call others dummies and not smart enough to hold the office.
So far Obama is doing a masterful job. Now he wants to call in the Republicans and smear the blame around? No thannks Mr Dolt.

The party that draws from Buckley and Wills – why are you so enamored of this lightweight ?

All my life I have wondered how you sort a smart person from a dull person? According to the left, Eisenhower was dull. Ford was really dull. Reagan made it all the way to clown. Bush 41 was dull and privileged. Bush 43 was a chimpHitleridiot. And now: Sarah Palin is lightweight which must be the feminine version of moron.

On the other hand, Truman was a really cagy, high school only man of the people. Kennedy accomplished little, but achieved the throne of a god. Johnson just tripped up. Carter was the most decent man ever. Clinton was the epitome of brilliant politician, economic wizardry, soulful leader and ever so slight screw up. Obama is the Messiah.

The pattern here never changes. Republican=hopeless bimbo; Democrat=smooth operator. Limbaugh and Fox need regulating; Air America and MSNBC need compulsory viewership.

In short, it is the lightweight commenter who always resorts to calling the Republican and all his or her admirers lightweight.

Come back, Phil Holmes and detail the evidence of Sarah Palin being a lightweight.

It shouldn’t be an issue, but won’t be surprised if it does if she does run for president. And I don’t think it will be only the Democrats who will use this. She will have to get through the Republican primary. No, it won’t be the other candidates that will point it out. But these things have a way of coming back to life by the use of these candidates campaigns.

Dan, I still haven’t forgot my promise to you if Palin does end up being a factor for president in 2012 or 2016. And as much as this shouldn’t be an issue, I believe that this is just an another example why she won’t be a factor in the next two presidential races.

Peter, you are right. It is my job to stand in front of 10-30 people several times a week. And even for courses that I’ve taught so many times before, I hardly ever walk in without some kind of notes. But never on my hand.

So Mr. Holmes, perhaps you could extend us the courtesy of explaining how a woman who successfully cut spending on a Lear Jet and a Chef, special interests, and re-developed effective citizen-serving energy policy during her governing tenure in Alaska, is a “lightweight.”

In addition Ms. Palin again demonstrated on Saturday, that she is the only political profile on our national stage today, who can define and address the critical issues. Her speech on Saturday eloquently addressed current terrorist policy failures, energy policy, the moral failure of inter-generational theft with respect to our chronic Washington debting, political process problems that erode trust, why participation in both the Democrat and Republican parties continues to drop, TARP fallout, failures of the current Health Care bill, and how to address them with ideas that will work and not exacerbate problems. In short, she addressed every issue on the minds of U.S. citizens living in reality today, in a succinct, fun, concise and professional manner.

So again Mr. Holmes, how is it you perceive this person as a “lightweight?” I don’t think Ms. Palin is the issue here, but rather your obvious and unfortunately popular disdain for the more ordinary politician on our national stage today, standing at a podium and telling the truth.

Do our country a favor Mr. Holmes. Wake up.

Today, though, the Hi Mom is making libs heads explode, everywhere. How dare that strumpet laugh at us! Does she not know that we went to the right schools?

Poor libs, there are how many presidential elections before Sarah is Reagan’s age when he was elected?

this simply shows how empty the teleprompter criticism is.

Its not hate at all -it’s the fact she is a fundamentalist, anti-science, inarticulate birdbrain. No one with any brains at all is comfortable with her and her witchdoctor leading the free world.

Of course, the hilarity in this comes from the fact that richard fully supports and endorses politicians who claim they are doing “God’s will” and whose pastors not only claim that terrorism against the United States is justified, but that HIV is a government plot to kill black people.

Do we want our No. 1 leader, the most powerful person on the planet, to have such a limited capacity for storing information that she needs to write on her hand a reminder to mention “Lift America’s spirits”??

But before:

Reagan used a teleprompter. So have most presidents in recent years (at least as far back as the 70s). This fixation on it is bizarre.

So richard insists that Palin writing a note on her hand proves that she has no brainpower, but then defends his Obama reading not only notes, but entire speeches, from a teleprompter as proof of his genius.

Also, richard, have you ever given a speech and used an outline? I guess that means you’re an idiot and lack brainpower since you can’t even remember the basic structure of your speech without having it written down in front of you.

The problem here is that you are simply an anti-Palin bigot who is doing everything in your power to smear her.

We know that from this statement here.

(H/t to this blogger for several of the above links; he is doing an amazing job documenting both the bad and good stories coming out about St. Sarah. I strongly suggest you head over there and keep scrolling.

Which is a link to Andrew Sullivan endorsing and supporting Trig Trutherism.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qp0hU1THjuc