<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin&#8217;s Laugh or a Clever Photoshop?  UPDATED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:26:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Daniel Blatt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549771</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549771</guid>
		<description>Loki, given that you take your name from the Germanic trickster deity, not sure how to take that.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loki, given that you take your name from the Germanic trickster deity, not sure how to take that.  <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki7329</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549762</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki7329</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549762</guid>
		<description>Thank you, B, Daniel.  I appreciate your willingness to say that you disagree with her on DADT.  I think you are doing a good job in presenting issues that concern the gay community to an audience that might not normally be receptive to them.  I say that sincerely and without irony or sarcasm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, B, Daniel.  I appreciate your willingness to say that you disagree with her on DADT.  I think you are doing a good job in presenting issues that concern the gay community to an audience that might not normally be receptive to them.  I say that sincerely and without irony or sarcasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Daniel Blatt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549678</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549678</guid>
		<description>Loki, it should be obvious to any reader of this blog that I disagree with Mrs. Palin on DADT.  Just because I don&#039;t address it here doesn&#039;t mean people are oblivious to it.  You found out somehow.  Interestingly, even though you have contributed frequently to this thread, your position on this post is something you don&#039;t want to share with its readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loki, it should be obvious to any reader of this blog that I disagree with Mrs. Palin on DADT.  Just because I don&#8217;t address it here doesn&#8217;t mean people are oblivious to it.  You found out somehow.  Interestingly, even though you have contributed frequently to this thread, your position on this post is something you don&#8217;t want to share with its readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549674</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549674</guid>
		<description>Actually, Loki, it&#039;s amusing that you sidestepped and refused to answer my question above; why should Sarah Palin support service by people like yourself who make decisions solely based on your sexual orientation?

I mean, really. Do you think the military has the luxury of having people like you around, who make it clear that you will make promotion decisions, combat decisions, and service decisions based solely on how it makes your sexual orientation look and feel? After all, you make it clear that no gay and lesbian person can support Sarah Palin, regardless of anything else, because she doesn&#039;t pander to their sexual orientation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Loki, it&#8217;s amusing that you sidestepped and refused to answer my question above; why should Sarah Palin support service by people like yourself who make decisions solely based on your sexual orientation?</p>
<p>I mean, really. Do you think the military has the luxury of having people like you around, who make it clear that you will make promotion decisions, combat decisions, and service decisions based solely on how it makes your sexual orientation look and feel? After all, you make it clear that no gay and lesbian person can support Sarah Palin, regardless of anything else, because she doesn&#8217;t pander to their sexual orientation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki7329</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549635</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki7329</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549635</guid>
		<description>I would have been more than willing to comment under a more appropriate blog post, but it seems her position on DADT is something you don&#039;t want to share with your audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have been more than willing to comment under a more appropriate blog post, but it seems her position on DADT is something you don&#8217;t want to share with your audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Daniel Blatt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549609</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549609</guid>
		<description>Um, Loki, I&#039;m not the one doing the side stepping here.  You&#039;re the one who came to my blog and attached a comment to my post where you didn&#039;t even acknowledge what I said.  Once you do that, I&#039;ll consider your point.  And yes, I do have an answer for it, just don&#039;t feel like taking the time to spell it out to someone who seems so disinterested in what I have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Loki, I&#8217;m not the one doing the side stepping here.  You&#8217;re the one who came to my blog and attached a comment to my post where you didn&#8217;t even acknowledge what I said.  Once you do that, I&#8217;ll consider your point.  And yes, I do have an answer for it, just don&#8217;t feel like taking the time to spell it out to someone who seems so disinterested in what I have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki7329</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549603</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki7329</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549603</guid>
		<description>B. Daniel,

Nice side stepping job.  I can understand why you don&#039;t want to tackle my question, since it ruins your narrative.  The truth is you can justify support of her in light of what she would mean for gay people.  

You ask me to account for and explain the actions of others.  I just asked you to explain and justify yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B. Daniel,</p>
<p>Nice side stepping job.  I can understand why you don&#8217;t want to tackle my question, since it ruins your narrative.  The truth is you can justify support of her in light of what she would mean for gay people.  </p>
<p>You ask me to account for and explain the actions of others.  I just asked you to explain and justify yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Teach</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549596</link>
		<dc:creator>William Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549596</guid>
		<description>Hmm, yeah, we have that really smart president now, Kevin, who thinks we have 58 states, mispronounces &quot;corpseman,&quot; brings a teleprompter to a press conference before talking to a 6th grade class, fails to salute the Marine prior to his first flight on Marine 1 (shook his hand) and then banged his head on the doorway, disses the Special Olympics, throws tons of people under his big bus, is constantly insulting private US citizens, gives Gordon Brown and wife crappy gifts, gives the Qween a freaking iPod with pictures and vids of himself, insults the British press corps, insults the Brits by sending back the bust of Churchill his first day in office, says the Cambridge police acted stupidly right after saying he knew nothing about the issue, and.....it keeps going on and on and on.

How about this one from just last month

&quot;The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries.&quot; --Tampa, Fla., Jan. 28, 2010

Imagine how the press and the folks on the left would have treated that one if Bush had said it?

Or, how about

&quot;On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes -- and I see many of them in the audience here today -- our sense of patriotism is particularly strong.&quot;

Bush would have been killed.

&quot;Hold on one second, sweetie, we&#039;re going to do -- we&#039;ll do a press avail.&quot; --to a female reporter for ABC&#039;s Detroit affiliate who asked about his plan to help American autoworkers

Where were the leftist women&#039;s rights groups over that one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, yeah, we have that really smart president now, Kevin, who thinks we have 58 states, mispronounces &#8220;corpseman,&#8221; brings a teleprompter to a press conference before talking to a 6th grade class, fails to salute the Marine prior to his first flight on Marine 1 (shook his hand) and then banged his head on the doorway, disses the Special Olympics, throws tons of people under his big bus, is constantly insulting private US citizens, gives Gordon Brown and wife crappy gifts, gives the Qween a freaking iPod with pictures and vids of himself, insults the British press corps, insults the Brits by sending back the bust of Churchill his first day in office, says the Cambridge police acted stupidly right after saying he knew nothing about the issue, and&#8230;..it keeps going on and on and on.</p>
<p>How about this one from just last month</p>
<p>&#8220;The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries.&#8221; &#8211;Tampa, Fla., Jan. 28, 2010</p>
<p>Imagine how the press and the folks on the left would have treated that one if Bush had said it?</p>
<p>Or, how about</p>
<p>&#8220;On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes &#8212; and I see many of them in the audience here today &#8212; our sense of patriotism is particularly strong.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bush would have been killed.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hold on one second, sweetie, we&#8217;re going to do &#8212; we&#8217;ll do a press avail.&#8221; &#8211;to a female reporter for ABC&#8217;s Detroit affiliate who asked about his plan to help American autoworkers</p>
<p>Where were the leftist women&#8217;s rights groups over that one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549591</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not bothered by the means in which any president, politician, etc. delivers their speeches.  Whether it be by note cards, 8.5 x 11 pages, a teleprompter, whatever. Except for easily memorized stump speeches, new speeches are generally read from some kind of notes, somehow.

What is bothersome about Sarah Palin is that she never stands up to scrutiny beyond her canned speeches.  She proves time and time again that she doesn&#039;t grasp concepts of law, the government, how it operates or, indeed, real ideas for making changes.  For 8 years I watched the last president who could read speeches, but literally could not deliver a coherent, grammatically correct sentence the entire time he was in office (the comment about gynecologists being able to love their patients is one tragic reminder that comes to mind easily).  President O&#039;Bama, on the other hand, can hold himself in a press conference, speak intelligently when asked a question and gives an indication he&#039;s at least thought about the topic at some point.

Mrs. Palin falls into that category of politicians who can *never* answer a direct question any where, any time about policy, what will work, what won&#039;t work, etc.  It&#039;s nice to have zingers,  but you can&#039;t keep using them when you&#039;ve got nothing real/solid to back them up.  She proved this early on in her interviews with the extremely lightweight Katie Couric and she continues to prove this every time she opens her mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not bothered by the means in which any president, politician, etc. delivers their speeches.  Whether it be by note cards, 8.5 x 11 pages, a teleprompter, whatever. Except for easily memorized stump speeches, new speeches are generally read from some kind of notes, somehow.</p>
<p>What is bothersome about Sarah Palin is that she never stands up to scrutiny beyond her canned speeches.  She proves time and time again that she doesn&#8217;t grasp concepts of law, the government, how it operates or, indeed, real ideas for making changes.  For 8 years I watched the last president who could read speeches, but literally could not deliver a coherent, grammatically correct sentence the entire time he was in office (the comment about gynecologists being able to love their patients is one tragic reminder that comes to mind easily).  President O&#8217;Bama, on the other hand, can hold himself in a press conference, speak intelligently when asked a question and gives an indication he&#8217;s at least thought about the topic at some point.</p>
<p>Mrs. Palin falls into that category of politicians who can *never* answer a direct question any where, any time about policy, what will work, what won&#8217;t work, etc.  It&#8217;s nice to have zingers,  but you can&#8217;t keep using them when you&#8217;ve got nothing real/solid to back them up.  She proved this early on in her interviews with the extremely lightweight Katie Couric and she continues to prove this every time she opens her mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashpenaz</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549570</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashpenaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549570</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this will become a Tea Party thing--speakers writing secret messages on their hands. I wonder--would &quot;Janene Garafolo is a big fat idiot&quot; fit on my palm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this will become a Tea Party thing&#8211;speakers writing secret messages on their hands. I wonder&#8211;would &#8220;Janene Garafolo is a big fat idiot&#8221; fit on my palm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITK</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549566</link>
		<dc:creator>ITK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549566</guid>
		<description>Ha ha...we go on scrutinizing Palin&#039;s $100K &quot;handjob&quot; while media whores on the left and right trade shots w/GOP televangelist/pin-up doll -- she trades shots w/Mr.Wall St-banker bailout POTUS -- we continue to lose our jobs, homes, futures (minds) and our children continue being sacrificed in their wars (mega profits) -- how&#039;s that working out for ANY of us? These so-called leaders are installed via corp funding, and know this...they don&#039;t give a damn about us! Bread &amp; Circus...like it&#039;s been for thousands of years --the Romans were most honest about it...rulers and serfs...that&#039;s the playing field....read &quot;The Grand Chessboard&quot; by Zbig Brzezinski...Obama/Sarah Palin phenomenon was planned before she won Miss Wasilla! Why are ALL Obama records sealed? They play multi-level chess, while we play checkers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha&#8230;we go on scrutinizing Palin&#8217;s $100K &#8220;handjob&#8221; while media whores on the left and right trade shots w/GOP televangelist/pin-up doll &#8212; she trades shots w/Mr.Wall St-banker bailout POTUS &#8212; we continue to lose our jobs, homes, futures (minds) and our children continue being sacrificed in their wars (mega profits) &#8212; how&#8217;s that working out for ANY of us? These so-called leaders are installed via corp funding, and know this&#8230;they don&#8217;t give a damn about us! Bread &amp; Circus&#8230;like it&#8217;s been for thousands of years &#8211;the Romans were most honest about it&#8230;rulers and serfs&#8230;that&#8217;s the playing field&#8230;.read &#8220;The Grand Chessboard&#8221; by Zbig Brzezinski&#8230;Obama/Sarah Palin phenomenon was planned before she won Miss Wasilla! Why are ALL Obama records sealed? They play multi-level chess, while we play checkers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Veit</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549560</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Veit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549560</guid>
		<description>There is a great satire on Libs http://oraculations.blogspot.com/2010/02/tea-party-loar.html here.  I did not write it, I simply copied an email from a reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a great satire on Libs <a href="http://oraculations.blogspot.com/2010/02/tea-party-loar.html" rel="nofollow">http://oraculations.blogspot.com/2010/02/tea-party-loar.html</a> here.  I did not write it, I simply copied an email from a reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger thistle</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549556</link>
		<dc:creator>roger thistle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549556</guid>
		<description>What drives everyone crazy about Sarah?  

It&#039;s simple as playing a Beatles song backwards:  Sarah backwards is HARAS.  

Liberals read it as &quot;Harass&quot; as in &#039;bother her now&quot; and Conservatives read it as &quot;Herass&quot; as in &quot;Doesn&#039;t she have a great...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What drives everyone crazy about Sarah?  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s simple as playing a Beatles song backwards:  Sarah backwards is HARAS.  </p>
<p>Liberals read it as &#8220;Harass&#8221; as in &#8216;bother her now&#8221; and Conservatives read it as &#8220;Herass&#8221; as in &#8220;Doesn&#8217;t she have a great&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heliotrope</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549542</link>
		<dc:creator>heliotrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549542</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; BREAKING NEWS!!! It’s not a Photoshop.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Huh? There isn&#039;t a dedicated photoshop troll out there writing on Palin&#039;s palm? Sounds like a typical political war room tactic to me.

However, should Palin have written on her palm, it is no biggie to me and here is why: I would find a &quot;Hi, mom!&quot; hand flash to her mother as endearing. If she wrote a last minute unscripted key words on her palm, so what? It hardly rises to Obama reading his stage directions off the teleprompter as an integral part of his speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> BREAKING NEWS!!! It’s not a Photoshop.</p></blockquote>
<p>Huh? There isn&#8217;t a dedicated photoshop troll out there writing on Palin&#8217;s palm? Sounds like a typical political war room tactic to me.</p>
<p>However, should Palin have written on her palm, it is no biggie to me and here is why: I would find a &#8220;Hi, mom!&#8221; hand flash to her mother as endearing. If she wrote a last minute unscripted key words on her palm, so what? It hardly rises to Obama reading his stage directions off the teleprompter as an integral part of his speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549539</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549539</guid>
		<description>maybe Levi thinks it&#039;s 75% deserved?  Like he thinks Iraq was 75% corruption?

I&#039;m still wondering how Levi can protest the free speech decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe Levi thinks it&#8217;s 75% deserved?  Like he thinks Iraq was 75% corruption?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still wondering how Levi can protest the free speech decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549532</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549532</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Do you actually think this lady has the smarts to lead our country?&lt;/i&gt;

As opposed to the empty suit that resides in the White House now? Once again, what exactly were his qualifications other than the color of his skin? America&#039;s Affirmative Action President.

More proof that Affirmative Action is an epic FAIL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Do you actually think this lady has the smarts to lead our country?</i></p>
<p>As opposed to the empty suit that resides in the White House now? Once again, what exactly were his qualifications other than the color of his skin? America&#8217;s Affirmative Action President.</p>
<p>More proof that Affirmative Action is an epic FAIL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549529</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549529</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Yes, the left MSM does attack Palin on a regular basis………BUT…….at least some of it is well deserved.&lt;/i&gt; 

So in other words, you support everything that the media does to Palin because you think a portion of it might be deserved.

So which part do you support? The one where the media claimed she faked her pregnancy and that Trig is not her child? The one where the media claimed her husband was having incestuous sex with her daughters? Why do you support and endorse that, Carol?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yes, the left MSM does attack Palin on a regular basis………BUT…….at least some of it is well deserved.</i> </p>
<p>So in other words, you support everything that the media does to Palin because you think a portion of it might be deserved.</p>
<p>So which part do you support? The one where the media claimed she faked her pregnancy and that Trig is not her child? The one where the media claimed her husband was having incestuous sex with her daughters? Why do you support and endorse that, Carol?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549528</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549528</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Now that Sarah Palin has come out against repealing DADT, I’d like to hear your thoughts on that. She considers repealing DADT to be a waste of time. Think about that. Allowing thousands of gay Americans to serve our country with dignity and honesty is a waste of time to her. Why do you continue to support someone who clearly doesn’t support you?&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, that demonstrates exactly why DADT is necessary; gays and lesbians like yourself make decisions based solely on your sexual orientation, without any consideration whatsoever for any other factors.

That is not acceptable behavior for the military. Our armed forces cannot afford to have people like yourself serve whose primary consideration on every decision is your sexual orientation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Now that Sarah Palin has come out against repealing DADT, I’d like to hear your thoughts on that. She considers repealing DADT to be a waste of time. Think about that. Allowing thousands of gay Americans to serve our country with dignity and honesty is a waste of time to her. Why do you continue to support someone who clearly doesn’t support you?</i></p>
<p>Actually, that demonstrates exactly why DADT is necessary; gays and lesbians like yourself make decisions based solely on your sexual orientation, without any consideration whatsoever for any other factors.</p>
<p>That is not acceptable behavior for the military. Our armed forces cannot afford to have people like yourself serve whose primary consideration on every decision is your sexual orientation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549521</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549521</guid>
		<description>Great comment from one of Michelle Malkin&#039;s readers:&lt;blockquote&gt;Reader D e-mails: “It doesn’t get much greener than writing notes on your hand, does it? It costs a bit of ink and a bit of soap to wash it off. No teleprompter which uses energy. No paper which kills trees. The Left should be consistent and applaud her greenness.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comment from one of Michelle Malkin&#8217;s readers:<br />
<blockquote>Reader D e-mails: “It doesn’t get much greener than writing notes on your hand, does it? It costs a bit of ink and a bit of soap to wash it off. No teleprompter which uses energy. No paper which kills trees. The Left should be consistent and applaud her greenness.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heliotrope</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/08/sarah-palins-laugh-or-a-clever-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-549518</link>
		<dc:creator>heliotrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22422#comment-549518</guid>
		<description>Levi in 10 &amp;11:&lt;blockquote&gt;You post your thoughts, others read it, and they post their thoughts.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Golly, that is really simple!&lt;blockquote&gt;Sarah Palin is bleeding you morons dry.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Gosh I am really simple.&lt;blockquote&gt;She abandoned public service because she realized there are throngs of mindless conservative automatons willing to finance the lifestyle she’s always dreamed of having.&lt;/blockquote&gt;What a simple plan.&lt;blockquote&gt;We’ll stop talking about her when you stop talking about her, deal?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;Oh, oh. This is too complex for me.

If we make her go away, you will allow her to go away. Right? But we are morons. Shouldn&#039;t the bright guys make her go away and just leave the morons wondering what happened?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Levi in 10 &amp;11:<br />
<blockquote>You post your thoughts, others read it, and they post their thoughts.</p></blockquote>
<p>Golly, that is really simple!<br />
<blockquote>Sarah Palin is bleeding you morons dry.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gosh I am really simple.<br />
<blockquote>She abandoned public service because she realized there are throngs of mindless conservative automatons willing to finance the lifestyle she’s always dreamed of having.</p></blockquote>
<p>What a simple plan.<br />
<blockquote>We’ll stop talking about her when you stop talking about her, deal?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, oh. This is too complex for me.</p>
<p>If we make her go away, you will allow her to go away. Right? But we are morons. Shouldn&#8217;t the bright guys make her go away and just leave the morons wondering what happened?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

