The Unhinged Liberal Professor Struck Again … in 2002
From Gabriel Malor at Ace of Spades:
In March, 2002, Bishop walked into an International House of Pancakes in Peabody with her family, asked for a booster seat for one of her children, and learned the last seat had gone to another mother.
Bishop, according to a police report, strode over to the other woman, demanded the seat and launched into a profanity-laced rant.
When the woman would not give the seat up, Bishop punched her in the head, all the while yelling “I AM DR. AMY BISHOP.”
[Original story link at Boston.com]
I’m guessing — just a hunch — that the lovely Professor Bishop also thought that December 12, 2000 was the end of the world.
-Bruce (GayPatriot)
26 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
The libs, typically, are circling the wagons around this one. Is there no line in the sand with these folks?
Comment by ThatGayConservative — February 17, 2010 @ 12:25 am - February 17, 2010
haha. of course not.
Comment by American Elephant — February 17, 2010 @ 2:32 am - February 17, 2010
Who is this woman?
Comment by Neptune — February 17, 2010 @ 8:34 am - February 17, 2010
Never mind – momentary brain cramp there.
Comment by Neptune — February 17, 2010 @ 8:35 am - February 17, 2010
How is this woman not a Democrat senator?
Comment by V the K — February 17, 2010 @ 8:48 am - February 17, 2010
Who is circling the wagons? Uh, what?
It sounds like this woman has bi-polar disorder more than she’s some committed, left-wing, violent ideologue. Again, contrast this with the man that killed the abortion doctor and bragged about it at his trial. Can you honestly not see any difference? Where is this woman’s tirade against George Bush? How is her crime in any way a reflection of some extreme leftist viewpoint? Do all of you wake up every morning and think to yourselves, “How can we be as delusional and disconnected from reality as possible today?”
Comment by Levi — February 17, 2010 @ 9:16 am - February 17, 2010
“Disconnected from reality”? You think we’re disconnected from reality? What do you take us for, Global Warming supporters?
Comment by The_Livewire — February 17, 2010 @ 9:50 am - February 17, 2010
Thanks.
Comment by ThatGayConservative — February 17, 2010 @ 10:59 am - February 17, 2010
It still fascinates me the obsession the libs have with the guy who killed the abortion doctor and totally ignored the soldier killed by a radical Muslim. If the former had been a subscriber to the religion of pieces, they wouldn’t have given a damn about him either.
Comment by ThatGayConservative — February 17, 2010 @ 11:01 am - February 17, 2010
What I still don’t get is how her mother could be so complicit in helping her avoid justice for murdering her own brother. What kind of a mother is that????
And now this evil woman has spawned four children who have lived with her evil influence all these years.
Here’s hoping they rebel big time.
Comment by Leah — February 17, 2010 @ 11:03 am - February 17, 2010
What kind of a mother is that????
My mom definitely played favorites, but that’s ridiculous.
Comment by V the K — February 17, 2010 @ 11:31 am - February 17, 2010
Can you honestly not see any difference?
Yes, we can see a difference.
When your fellow leftists kill people, you blame them and only them, regardless of the evidence. When people with opinions you don’t like kill people, you don’t blame them; you blame those you don’t like who you claim “made” them kill others, regardless of the evidence.
In short, the sole difference here and the only piece of evidence you need to make an absolute judgment is whether or not the person is an Obama supporter. Anything else is irrelevant.
Comment by North Dallas Thirty — February 17, 2010 @ 11:56 am - February 17, 2010
It still fascinates me the obsession the libs have with the guy who killed the abortion doctor and totally ignored the soldier killed by a radical Muslim. If the former had been a subscriber to the religion of pieces, they wouldn’t have given a damn about him either.
What does that have to do with anything?
And yeah, somebody that goes around killing people that provide legal medical procedures to terrorize others from taking part is something I’m going to obsess over.
Comment by Levi — February 17, 2010 @ 1:23 pm - February 17, 2010
Yes, we can see a difference.
When your fellow leftists kill people, you blame them and only them, regardless of the evidence. When people with opinions you don’t like kill people, you don’t blame them; you blame those you don’t like who you claim “made” them kill others, regardless of the evidence.
In short, the sole difference here and the only piece of evidence you need to make an absolute judgment is whether or not the person is an Obama supporter. Anything else is irrelevant.
Did you just repost what you posted in the other thread?
North, you are one of the dumbest people on the internet. You need to find a hobby, because you suck at this.
Comment by Levi — February 17, 2010 @ 1:24 pm - February 17, 2010
#6: “Again, contrast this with the man that killed the abortion doctor and bragged about it at his trial. Can you honestly not see any difference? Where is this woman’s tirade against George Bush? How is her crime in any way a reflection of some extreme leftist viewpoint?”
Yes, Levi, we are capable of seeing a distinction in what is currently known about the specific motivations attributable to each of the individuals–at this point, there does not appear to be evidence that Amy Bishop’s motivation for murdering three people was fueled by her left wing beliefs, but that’s not the end of the story. YOU are failing to recognize the distinction in the presumptions that are applied to all conservatives and all liberals by the MSM and the Obama Administration when it comes to violence generally.
The MSM unapologetically treats conservatives (particularly those who show up at Tea Party rallies and members of the armed forces) as would-be murders of abortion providers, would-be mass shooters, would-be war criminals, would-be abusers of their spouses and children, would-be rapists, etc. As far as the MSM is concerned, the only difference between the murderer of Tiller and every other “Teabagger” is that the others just haven’t “snapped” yet or been sufficiently provoked by Foxnews or conservative talk radio hosts to lash out and commit the violent crimes that liberals presume they can BARELY suppress. The mere fact of having conservative beliefs is treated by the MSM (and Janet Napolitano’s Dept. of Homeland Security) as evidence that violent proclivities boil just a scratch below the surface. And of course you’ll deny it, but if what I’m saying isn’t true, then why do moonbats like Arianna Huffington spend their time on the Sunday shows scolding Republicans, Foxnews, and talk radio hosts for “promoting violence” and creating a political climate of “fear and paranoia”? She presumes (as do all liberals and the MSM) that conservatives and “teabaggers” have no personal responsibility or moral compass and that the only way to contain their savage instincts is for the GOP, Foxnews, and Rush Limbaugh to “be responsible” and contain their “inflammatory” comments because criticizing Obama is now equivalent to shouting “fire!” in the proverbial crowded theater.
In CONTRAST, the MSM affords liberals the presumption that liberalism condemns violence generally, does not promote violence among its adherents, and more importantly, that liberals are simply incapable of violence AS INDIVIDUALS TO BEGIN WITH. This conveniently allows liberals to say or do whatever they want with impunity because no matter how shocking, libelous, or inflammatory their rhetoric may be, it will never be considered “irresponsible” because liberals are far too enlightened and evolved to be actually provoked to commit violence. Ergo, liberal filmmakers can depict Republican Presidents being assassinated in their work, liberal activists can expect national coverage of their allegations that Republicans engineered 9/11, etc. In short, liberals are civilized and non-violent; thus, they can inject ANYTHING into the marketplace of ideas and enjoy immunity for its repercussions because their audience can handle it. Conservatives on the other hand are called upon to think twice before even disagreeing with Obama’s policies because their audience is a mob of slobbering, grunting, homicidal maniacs just looking for an excuse to go on a bloody, Texas-chainsaw rampage.
The Amy Bishop story is worth discussing because it illustrates that liberals can be violent psychotics just as conservatives can be violent psychotics. Since the MSM’s position has always been that political speech is capable of provoking violent psychotics to commit acts of violence, they have no basis to assign any greater obligation to conservatives to “be responsible” for their rhetoric than they are willing to assign to themselves. Of course, liberals like Arianna Huffington categorically reject such standards for themselves, so in the end, the conclusion is that they should take their demands that the GOP, Foxnews, and talk radio hosts be more “responsible” and cram it.
Comment by Sean A — February 17, 2010 @ 1:30 pm - February 17, 2010
And yeah, somebody that goes around killing people that provide legal medical procedures to terrorize others from taking part is something I’m going to obsess over.
Note again, how he avoids people like the ELF and Bill Ayers. This is the true mark of a facist “When your people do it it’s bad, but when mine do, it’s for your own good. Because I’m better than you.”
Comment by The_Livewire — February 17, 2010 @ 1:58 pm - February 17, 2010
Did you just repost what you posted in the other thread?
Yup. One repost deserves another. Since your posts represent neither intellectual effort or originality, you need only be answered with the same.
North, you are one of the dumbest people on the internet. You need to find a hobby, because you suck at this.
Which is, of course, why you ended up running away in humiliation the last time you tried to spread your lies in front of me.
It must suck to be so easily defeated by “the dumbest person on the internet”, I would imagine. Indeed, that likely has been the pattern for your life, Levi; you can’t understand why all these professors, these businesspeople, and so forth who are so much dumber, so much more amoral, and so much less perfect than you are can give you bad grades, refuse to hire you, judge your performance, and turn you out. That’s probably why you want government to step in and force these people to give you good grades, a no-show job, etc., regardless of whether you earn it or not, and that’s why you’re a supporter of Barack Obama.
Comment by North Dallas Thirty — February 17, 2010 @ 3:14 pm - February 17, 2010
And yeah, somebody that goes around killing people that provide legal medical procedures to terrorize others from taking part is something I’m going to obsess over.
And let’s show what Levi deems a “legal medical procedure”.
After the tape was released last year, state health inspectors reviewed clinic records and found that nine minors, ages 13-15, had received abortions without proper verification of parental consent since November 2008.
In one case, health officials said, a 15-year-old received an abortion even though the person claiming to be her mother did not appear to be and presented questionable records, including an expired Alabama driver’s license. Inspectors said Alabama birth records show a different person as the girl’s parent.
There were also concerns about reporting child abuse. One of the 13-year-olds who received an abortion reported starting having sex at age 12 and having three partners in the previous year. She was back at the clinic for another abortion four months later and said she had now had four sexual partners in her life.
“A reasonable person would suspect abuse or neglect of this 13-year-old child, based on the above,” inspectors wrote. “Neither the Registered Nurse, the Medical Doctor, nor any other Center staff reported the suspected abuse or neglect to the authorities as required by law.”
Shows you how “moral” Levi is — he puts abortion first and foremost, disobeys laws requiring parental consent and reporting, and covers up sexual abuse of minors.
Why do you support sexual abuse of minors, Levi? Why does your Obama Party demand that organizations that provide unlawful abortions to minors receive Federal funding? Why are you diverting taxpayer dollars to pay for coverups of these kind of activities?
Comment by North Dallas Thirty — February 17, 2010 @ 3:27 pm - February 17, 2010
How disingenuous to report on a bat***t crazy person as the “unhinged liberal professor”! When the worst of the crazies claiming to be conservative do something horrendous, do you not complain? Do you need to attack the weakest of liberals? You should be attacking the strongest instead to show confidence in your opposition to liberalism.
Comment by DRH — February 17, 2010 @ 11:50 pm - February 17, 2010
Let’s see.
1) Bishop is clearly unhinged.
2) Bishop is clearly a liberal.
3) Bishop is clearly a professor.
What’s the problem again?
When the worst of the crazies claiming to be conservative do something horrendous, DRH, *do you not join in* bashing them? I mean you personally, say in conversations with your friends. Sincere question.
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — February 18, 2010 @ 12:54 am - February 18, 2010
(i.e. join in attempting to bash all conservatives, or make slurs to the effect that their acts rose from conservative beliefs in general)
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — February 18, 2010 @ 12:55 am - February 18, 2010
Well, at least we now know Levi was a student of hers. Who else would leave a comment like this?
Comment by The_Livewire — February 18, 2010 @ 8:17 am - February 18, 2010
TL – But where are the joke ratings? “Dr. Bishop’s midterm just about killed me.” “Dr. Bishop asked me if I would treat my own brother in the cavalier way I treated her class.” Etc.
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — February 18, 2010 @ 11:52 am - February 18, 2010
I see the Ministry of Disinformation has arrived with reinforcements (LEVI and DRH). I am an outsider here and I comment in regard to some of the factors of the case that need discussion.
The politics of the woman in question are not considered in regard to the crime that has been committed. Even her ultra left wing views, and unhinged thoughts are not relevant to the crime in question.
However, what is relevant here is that a former District Attorney by the name of DELAHUNT who is presently a member of the House of Reps in Congress and has a D after his name, acted to prevent Bishop being charged with the manslaughter or murder of her brother Seth. This was done because her mother was a known Democrat. It is scandalous and yet another scandal associated with the Dems in Massachusetts.
On top of this, the woman had an argument with one of her supervising professors when she was at Harvard. He got a pipe bomb in the mail. Although she was questioned and no charges laid, the case has never been resolved.
The confrontation in the restaurant is just another situation with regard to this woman.
It should be pointed out that she also attempted to steal a motor vehicle at gunpoint after she had killed her brother.
The major point is that when it comes to certain stories the left-wing crazies go all out with their lies and they smear people who are of good standing in the community. A good case is that of the man who did in fact commit suicide. He was not murdered, yet the left wing crazies smeared a lot of good people with their blogs and comments.
It is also notable that in this case the LSM have gone out of their way to avoid the obvious party affiliation, which is only relevant because of the manner in which she was set free after she had killed her brother. It was corruption of the criminal process.
Comment by StraightAussie — February 18, 2010 @ 5:18 pm - February 18, 2010
When the crazies are crazy, I do bash them. But I don’t use the bashing stick to bash all the others of their ‘tribe’. Ditto when when the bashing is about women, blacks, foreigners, Mormons, Nevadans, etc. OK, maybe some light ribbing from time to time. And I’m not so kind to Scientologists in general … so I guess there are exceptions.
Actually, I’ve been reading this blog regularly to figure out what makes a conservative conservative. At the same time I’ve been reading some liberal blogs for the same reason.
Honestly, I find this blog post disappointing because it falls back into the sort of tribalism that is rather more rare here.
Comment by DRH — February 18, 2010 @ 8:42 pm - February 18, 2010
StraightAussie, I don’t get how you say I’m coming from the “ministry of disinformation” when you say exactly the point I was getting at: “The politics of the woman in question are not considered in regard to the crime that has been committed. Even her ultra left wing views, and unhinged thoughts are not relevant to the crime in question.”
Comment by DRH — February 18, 2010 @ 8:45 pm - February 18, 2010