Gay Patriot Header Image

Camille Paglia on Marriage

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 4:36 pm - February 16, 2010.
Filed under: Divas,Gay Marriage,Literature & Ideas

While quoting Camille Paglia in my dissertation, I chanced up on another comment I had flagged in her landmark, Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson:

Marriage is the social regulation and placement of sexual energies, which for [English poet Edmund] Spenser otherwise fall back into the anarchy of nature, rule by the will-to-power and survival of the fittest.  Marriage is the sanctified link between nature and society.  Sex in Spenser must always have a social goal.

Save perhaps for Jonathan Rauch, gay marriage advocates have yet to defend marriage in such terms.  Perhaps, they might get a better response from the American people if they did.

Leaning Toward Meg, Part II

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 4:24 pm - February 16, 2010.
Filed under: 2010 Elections,California politics

About my choice in the California gubernatorial primary, I wrote last week, “I always thought I’d just wait until a few days before the primary and vote for whoever was polling better against Moonbeam Brown.”  If the latest polls are any indication, that’ll be Meg Whitman: “The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely California voters finds Republican hopeful Whitman and Brown tied with 43% each.”  Her chief rival for the GOP nomination runs a full 12 points behind the state’s former Democratic Governor.

Considering that career politician Brown is a “known quantity to California voters, having served as secretary of state, two terms as governor, state Democratic party chairman, mayor of Oakland, and state attorney general“, he would have to be counted as the incumbent in this race, which means undecided voters are likely to break against him.

Looking less and less likely like he’ll have another turn as the Golden State’s chief executive.

(H/t:  Jim Geraghty.)

Here’s The REAL Headline:

Posted by ColoradoPatriot at 3:22 pm - February 16, 2010.
Filed under: Obama's Remorse,Obamania

An incredible outcome of the most recent CNN poll, released today. The headline will likely be that President Obama’s approval rating may have hit its floor, stuck at 49%. Also of some note, the generic Democrat/Republican leaning is still a bit to the right (within the margin of error), so not much news there, either. People don’t like Congress, but despise Republicans a little bit less than Democrats. Small consolation, and in any case, yadda yadda.

But check this out:

“Do you think Barack Obama deserves to be reelected, or not?”

“Yes”: 44%
“No”: 52%

Think this’ll lead on CNN this evening? I guess we’ll see.
(h/t, NRO)

-Nick (ColoradoPatriot, from TML)

UPDATE: As I’d have imagined, the online story over at CNN.com in paragraph 11 out of a 13 paragraph story, makes a passing reference to this shocking number. Dare I torture myself by watching The Situation Room to see if it makes it on the air?

UP-UPDATE: Never let it be said that I’m not fair: Wolf mentioned this result as the second one from the poll in his reading of the story just now at the top of the hour. David Gergen even went into deapth with it. Credit where it’s due, and I’m grateful I don’t have to watch the whole show now!

A Forthcoming Occidental Accident?

So now it seems President Obama, so helpful in delivering victories in New Jersey and Virginia last year, and coming off the landslide success he helped bring Democrats in Massachusetts last month is heading West to help ailing Senators in my neck of the woods.

If I could speak on behalf of the challengers to Senators Bennet in Colorado and Reid in Nevada: “Thank God!”

Also, since all my Leftist friends always seem so eager to tout the importance of intelligence in elected officials (who better, of course, to run every aspect of our lives than the elite brainiacs), might I say that, with the recent track-record of President Obama “helping” Democrats in their quest for office, anybody foolish enough to feel he’s the answer to a win likely doesn’t fall into the category of super-smart anyway, so perhaps it all does work out in the end.

-Nick (ColoradoPatriot, from TML)

Janet? Hello, Janet?

As the bizarre picture of Amy Bishop, the nutjob who (allegedly) shot up the University of Alabama last week, becomes more clear, we get this interesting tid-bit from her old home-town (she’s originally from Braintree) newspaper, The Boston Herald:

A family source said Bishop, a mother of four children – the youngest a third-grade boy – was a far-left political extremist who was “obsessed” with President Obama to the point of being off-putting.

The first, and most obvious question is, sound like anybody you know?

And naturally, the second question is, given that DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano wants us to be afraid of any conservative militia member returning from deployment as a national security threat (how many, by the way, have shot up places since she issued that warning?), I wonder if she’s interested in re-evaluating her criteria now. I’m not holding my breath.

-Nick (ColoradoPatriot, from TML)

UPDATE from Bruce (GayPatriot): Nick beat me too it. So my only addition to his post is to officially declare Professor Bishop as an “UNHINGED LIBERAL“. There are far too many these days….

UPDATE (from Dan):  This from an Instapundit reader:  if Bishop “had been a conservative it’d lead every evening news cast for two months.”  Althouse elaborates:  ”If Amy Bishop had turned out to be right wing, the MSM would have made a big deal out of it.

Where are the Jobs? Ma’am? Ma’am?

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 12:10 pm - February 16, 2010.
Filed under: 110th Congress,Big Government Follies,Economy

Just over a year ago, California’s junior Senator praised herself and her Democratic colleagues in the Senate for passing the “stimulus,” “In the face of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, the Congress has acted today to save or create jobs in California and across the nation.” Her office noted that, “The White House predicts that the legislation will save or create approximately 400,000 jobs in California.”

Well, today, no one really believes her or the White House.  According to Jim Hoft:

Just 6% of Americans believe the $787 “stimulus” boondoggle created any jobs according to a recent New York Times/CBS poll.

Over at the Washington Examiner, they expose the Administration’s doctoring the data on job creation:

Thousands of jobs were claimed to have been saved or created in phantom congressional districts and ZIP codes. Thousands of raises given to public employees were counted as jobs saved or created. The Examiner‘s David Freddoso and Mark Hemingway examined media investigations and found nearly 100,000 phony positions. In other words, the claim that 2 million jobs were saved or created by the Obama economic stimulus program was exposed as being about as trustworthy as the used car salesman’s assurance that the clunker on his lot was owned by a little old lady who only drove it to church on Sunday.

No wonder Americans are so dubious about the success of the Administration’s signature “stimulus.”

Success Against Taliban; Hypocrisy at New York Times

Score a big one for our intelligence services:

The Taliban’s top military commander was captured several days ago in Karachi, Pakistan, in a secret joint operation by Pakistani and American intelligence forces, according to American government officials.

The commander, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, is an Afghan described by American officials as the most significant Taliban figure to be detained since the American-led war in Afghanistan started more than eight years ago. He ranks second in influence only to Mullah Muhammad Omar, the Taliban’s founder and a close associate of Osama bin Laden before the Sept. 11 attacks.

Kudos particularly to Leon Panetta, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and President Obama.  Does seem that he has a sound policy on Afghanistan.  And here, while our intelligence forces carried out the operations, the Administration authorized it.  As with his choice of General Stanley McChrystal, it seems Obama has tapped good people to fight the Taliban in this theater of operations.  Gotta give him credit for that.

And when Obama gets things right, the New York Times (who appears to have broken the story) shows its true colors.  First, read this passage: (more…)

The Magical Properties of Water

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 1:21 am - February 16, 2010.
Filed under: Health,Mythology and the real world

How fitting I should discover this tip in the RealAge Tips of the Week on the same day that I finish writing the section on Poseidon in my dissertation (and his rivalry with the goddess Athene):

It quenches your thirst, it’s practically free, and it gives you energy to boot. What’s this magical energy drink? It’s water.

I first discovered the energy-boosting properties of water when I worked in D.C.  Finding myself slowing down in the afternoon, I would grab a cup of coffee, but that wouldn’t work. Not sure when I discovered that drinking a glass of water served as the necessary pickup.

I stopped drinking coffee in the afternoon and reached instead for a glass of water.  A new study confirms what I observed, showing “that slight dehydration can send your energy into a nosedive.”

Even today, when I’m feeling lethargic, I find a few gulps of water often do the trick.  Indeed, whenever I’m driving long distances and find myself thinking of nodding off, I stop and get some water (which often creates other problems down the road, but it does increase my alertness).

Guess Poseidon really does represent our instinctual energies–as I wrote in my dissertation.

No, Ma’am, Californians don’t want to return you to the Senate

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 12:52 am - February 16, 2010.
Filed under: 2010 Elections,California politics

A friend alerted me to the latest Rasmussen poll of Golden State voters, a survey  referenced in a previous post.  And, Ma’am, they sure don’t look good for you:

The fact that [Barbara] Boxer’s support has been stuck in the mid-40s for several surveys no matter which Republican she is matched against continues to suggest that the race for now is about her rather than about those who are running against her.

Now, get this, while the state’s junior Senate polls no better than 47% against the three Republicans vying for the chance to replace her, leading my gal Carly and her more serious rival Tom Campbell by four points (46-42) and (45-41) respectively, she runs more than 10 points behind President Obama’s approval rate in the Golden State.  Here, despite a sour economy with an unemployment rate topping 12%, one of the highest in the nation, the President’s approval stands at 58%, one of the highest in the nation.

Should that fall, as is likely if the economy here doesn’t pick up steam, Mrs. Boxer will assuredly go down with him.  And remember this, two weeks before voters in Massachusetts elected Scott Brown to the United States Senate, Rasmussen had him down by nine.  He won by five.  That’s a fourteen-point shift.

With the Republican base enthused and Americans in an anti-incumbent mood, we could expect a similar turnaround out here.  The more Republicans can focus on Mrs. Boxer’s record, reminding Californians of her support for high taxes and job-killing and land-parching regulation, the more they’ll want new representation.  Indeed, they’re already unhappy with the incumbent.  Without any negative ads being run against her (and with a state media largely oblivious to her blunders and partisanship), voters don’t much cotton to the 28-year Washington veteran:   “Twenty-six percent (26%) of California voters share a very favorable opinion of Boxer, but 33% view the senator very unfavorably.” (more…)

Correlation between poll numbers & family time

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 12:08 am - February 16, 2010.
Filed under: 2010 Elections,Random Thoughts

While eating a late dinner, I heard Dick Morris say this about Evan Bayh’s decision to retire from the Senate:  ”When they start getting bad poll numbers, they start wanting to spend more time with their families.”

Uh oh, cold weather forecast for Golden State next weekend

Well, that is, presuming this fundraiser takes place in the Golden State, but given Mrs. Boxer’s travel schedule, unless she’s hawking her book, she’s probably in Washington, D.C. a place she seems to prefer to the jurisdiction she ostensibly represents.  With Ma’am unable to muster more than 50% in the polls in a state where Obama topped 60%, she’s looking for some outside help:

To help with the warmth of money, Boxer will have Al Gore headline a fundraiser for her next weekend.

Clever use  of the word, “warmth,” Mr. Malcolm (who wrote the words above).  Seems that wherever global warmist Al Gore gives a speech, record cold weather comes with him.

Well, so now we know where he’s going to emerge from hibernation.  And while his pet cause is taking on water faster than the Titanic after hitting an iceberg, he probably still has some credibility among the global warming dead-enders in the Golden State.

Do wonder how environmental zealotry will help Mrs. Boxer outside the circles where she’ll do well no matter what.  But, beyond those deep blue enclaves in the Hollywood and Bay Areas, most people in this state are more concerned with other issues.

More on the polls mentioned in the article above anon.  Had seen the survey results earlier in the day, then Instapundit linked the article above and well that line quoted above inspired a post.

BREAKING: Now IPCC Hurricane Data Is Questioned

The Global Warming Hoax Of The Century continues to crumble

More trouble looms for the IPCC. The body may need to revise statements made in its Fourth Assessment Report on hurricanes and global warming.  A statistical analysis of the raw data shows that the claims that global hurricane activity has increased cannot be supported.

Les Hatton once fixed weather models at the Met Office. Having studied Maths at Cambridge, he completed his PhD as metereologist: his PhD was the study of tornadoes and waterspouts. He’s a fellow of the Royal Meterological Society, currently teaches at the University of Kingston, and is well known in the software engineering community – his studies include critical systems analysis.

Hatton has released what he describes as an ‘A-level’ statistical analysis, which tests six IPCC statements against raw data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric (NOAA) Administration.  He’s published all the raw data and invites criticism, but warns he is neither “a warmist nor a denialist”, but a scientist.

Hatton performed a z-test statistical analysis of the period 1999-2009 against 1946-2009 to test the six conclusions. He also ran the data ending with what the IPCC had available in 2007. He found that North Atlantic hurricane activity increased significantly, but the increase was counterbalanced by diminished activity in the East Pacific, where hurricane-strength storms are 50 per cent more prevalent. The West Pacific showed no significant change. Overall, the declines balance the increases.

“When you average the number of storms and their strength, it almost exactly balances.” This isn’t indicative of an increase in atmospheric energy manifesting itself in storms.

I’d like nothing more than to see Al Gore charged with fraud by an international tribunal…. or economic crimes against humanity.  Either one that lands him in jail the quickest.  Maybe a Saudi jail??

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

UPDATE (from Dan): So, where are the global warmists left to be discredited? They’ve been hiding the decline (in temperatures), exaggerating the melting of Himalayan glaciers and the devastation of the Amazon rain forest and now they’ve been doctoring data about hurricanes. Wonder if they made any predictions about tornadoes.

The Resilience of George Washington

Perhaps, it’s because as a boy, I loved the musical 1776, I long ago became a fan of John Adams and appreciated his accomplishments before David McCullough‘s biography climbed the bestseller charts and alerted many Americans to the greatness of the short-tempered man from Massachusetts.  And only recently did I truly appreciate the greatness of his predecessor in the White House, the man whose greatness, in days of yore, was a staple of a public school education in these United States.  I kind of got my education in the Founders backwards.

It seems that, as Bruce said, “The American liberal wants us to forget about Washington.”  They tell us he was a mere place holder in the White House and that during the Revolutionary War, he lost more battles than he won.  In so doing, they ignore how much he did as President to secure the survival of this fledgling nation.

While they are indeed right that as general, he did lose more battles than he won.  He learned how to manage defeat so as to prevent those battlefield losses from becoming military catastrophes, inspiring his troops–and his fellow Americans then and now–by example, showing us how to face the vicissitudes of life for we all must face defeats and setbacks from time to time.

George Washington never gave up in situations where we could understand even the strongest of men turning tail.  And that is why the Crossing of the Delaware and Valley Forge were so important.  In succeeding winters, when it seemed all was lost, he held his troops together so they might survive to fight in the spring, well, in the first case, so they might first fight in dead of winter.

Thanks to Bruce for reminding us who we honor today.  Hopefully one week hence on the real anniversary of his birth, I’ll offer a more comprehensive testimonial, but for now let us remember this great man for his resilience, that he fought on when all seemed lost.

Is campaign all the Obami know how to do?

Such was my thought when I read this post, New White House communications strategy: More retorts to Republicans, more ‘high-profile’ Obama events, on the Washington Examiner.  To gain more traction for the agenda with the American people, Obama just need make a few “messaging adjustments“:

The messaging adjustments are the result of an end-of-the-year analysis in which White House advisers said the president’s communications team had not taken the initiative often enough and had allowed drawn-out debates in Congress, and relentless criticism by Republicans, to drown out his message.

Drown out his message?  Huh?  It got out there just fine.  It’s that the people just plain didn’t like it, most of us at least.

Instead of adjusting the message, perhaps they need to change it altogether.  Another post on that very web-site shows that Americans want smaller government, so maybe that’s why the Obama message is not playing as well  with the American people as did his campaign.  His agenda is for big government; his campaign focused on changing a Washington “living beyond its means”:

Donald Douglas at American Power blog notes other questions and responses [in a New York Times/CBS News survey] that suggest the president’s position with the public is vastly more negative than the Times’ leads its readers to believe. A strong majority, 56 percent, say they prefer a “smaller government with fewer services,” and nearly 60 percent say “government is doing too many things better left to businesses and individuals.”

Maybe if their message reflected that reality, it would better resonate with the American people.

It’s a sad sign about the current White House that they recognize  a problem, they believe they need only shift the communication strategy, instead of shifting the governing agenda.

Of course, Cheney Favors Repealing DADT

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 12:42 pm - February 15, 2010.
Filed under: Blogging,DADT,Gays In Military,Noble Republicans

Like us, Little Miss Attilla was not surprised that former Vice President Cheney favors lifting the ban on gays serving openly in our armed forces:

This is the guy whose daughter-in-law was the first same-sex partner at official state dinners in any Presidential administration.

Of course Cheney thinks that the change should be considered as soon as the military authorities figure out how to implement a new approach. And given the fact that the Israelis and the British have managed it, there’s really no reason we can’t.

Nice to see a lot of the bloggers and blogresses on the right coming out against DADT.

(H/t:  Instapundit.)

Is this the sound of the Senate flipping?

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 12:01 pm - February 15, 2010.
Filed under: 2010 Elections

Evan Bayh to retire.

At the beginning of the year, his seat was considered safe for the Democrats. Given the demographics of the state, you have to move this one from lean Democrat to lean Republican.

UPDATE: Barone weighs in:

Going into this cycle, [Bayh] looked like a sure bet for reelection.

Where does this leave Democrats in the 2010 Senate contests? Not in very good shape. The North Dakota seat held by Democrat Byron Dorgan seems sure to go to Republican John Hoeven. The Delaware seat held by Ted Kaufman (appointed to replace Joe Biden) seems very, very likely to go to Republican Mike Castle. The Indiana seat held by Bayh seems now very likely to go to a Republican.

Read the whole thing!

UPDATE FROM BRUCE (GayPatriot): Word is coming from Maryland that US Sen. Barbara Mikulski is also going to retire in the next few days.  Tsunami.

UP-UPDATE (from Dan): Let’s hope Michael Steele runs for the open seat.

Brennan: Terrorists = Purse-Snatchers

You remember John Brennan, who recently castigated those who would question the wisdom of the current Administration’s mishandling of terrorists as trying “to score political points, instead of coming together to keep us safe” and this is just “[p]olitically motivated criticism and unfounded fear-mongering” which “only serve the goals of al-Qaeda”. You know, as if there were no validity to the criticism, and the only way someone could possibly ever criticize such an inept handling of our enemy is if he were simply wanting to see America fail and al-Qaeda win. Nice to see we’ve got such a level-headed guy keeping us safe, no?

Anyway, this weekend at the Islamic Center of New York University, in response to a question about the recidivism rate of erstwhile Guantanamo-based terrorists, in equating these murderers and enemies of the United States to common criminals (and the 50% recidivism rate of “the American penal system”), Brennan flippantly says, “20% isn’t bad.”

Many will jump on the soundbite and simply criticize Brennan’s continued lack of concern for most American’s fear of any terrorists being granted a second opportunity to kill us all. But they’ll miss the more dramatic point of his response: That these enemies are basically no different than the prisoners who are incarcerated for stealing cars, selling drugs, or kiting checks.

Does Brennan (and does the current Administration) see no difference?

-Nick (ColoradoPatriot, from HQ)

Today Marks George Washington’s Birthday. Don’t Forget It.

I’m ticked off that we have to remember Presidents Washington & Lincoln in the same breath as Carter, Obama, Buchanan & Polk.  Let’s never forget that we are SUPPOSED to mark today as Washington’s Birthday.  And let’s learn something while we are at it, eh? (via UnionLeader.com)

Today is not Presidents’ Day. The holiday’s official title is George Washington’s Birthday. It is a day for celebrating the Father of our Country, whose greatness is often forgotten.

Few Americans know that George Washington never received more than elementary-level schooling. But he was a whiz at math, and his sharp mind and appetite for adventure led him to surveying, then to the Army.

Incredibly, in his first military adventure, the totally untrained soldier led an attack on a French force near the Ohio River, killing a French ambassador. Thus began the French and Indian War. Washington was captured and signed a statement, written in French, admitting to what were basically war crimes. In his next battle, Washington advised Gen. Edward Braddock to avoid traditional battle lines in an open field. Braddock ignored him, and the Indians slaughtered the British, killing Braddock. London blamed the colonials, including Washington.

Today, a young soldier’s career probably would be over — if he ever got into the Army with such little education to begin with. Washington soldiered on, eventually leading a small force of mostly militiamen to victory over the greatest military power the world had ever seen.

In 1788, a popular song in the new United States of America was “Great Washington shall rule the land.” But Washington wanted nothing of it. He was nearly broke and needed to restore his farm to profitability. But without campaigning for the job, he was unanimously elected President. He wrote of the results: “My movements to the chair of government will be accompanied by feelings not unlike those of a culprit who is going to the place of his execution … .”

On his ride to New York City, then the capital, he was serenaded by citizens singing, “Welcome, mighty chief!” Had he sought them, dictatorial powers were his for the taking. But on his inauguration, he wore a plain brown suit fitting of an average American, the first step in his plan to establish that Presidents were citizen executives, nothing more.

“As the first of everything in our situation will serve to establish a precedent, it is devoutly wished on my part, that these precedents may be fixed on true principles,” he wrote to James Madison. Following his principles, he spent the next eight years retiring the national debt, avoiding foreign entanglements and trying to ensure the stability of the young national government.

When he retired, George Washington was reviled by a large portion of the citizens who owed him their freedom. To avoid war, he had accepted a humiliating treaty with Britain. The newly formed opposition press brutally attacked and mocked him. But Washington never responded. He let the press and the people deride him as he rode home to Mount Vernon, where he died two years later.

Today, George Washington is the dour old man on the dollar bill. In his time, he was a colossus, the general who risked everything to defeat an empire, only to reject his own crown and retire to his farm after ensuring that no one would have the power he refused to take for himself. We owe him everything. Let us remember that, if not every day, at least on this one.

The American liberal wants us to forget about Washington.  He stood for individual freedom and liberty and the power of the people to overthrow tyranny.  They want to marginalize him and give him the “Alinsky Treatment.”

Not on my watch.

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Gay Conservatives Headed to CPAC This Week

Yep, I’ll be at CPAC this coming Wednesday through Sunday.   And so will GOProud…

GOProud will be the only gay organization co-sponsoring the 2010 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).  As most of you know, CPAC is the nation’s premier annual gathering of conservatives and GOProud is honored to have the opporunity to represent gay conservatives and our straight allies at this important event.

GOProud will be at CPAC standing up for the values of gay conservatives and I write to you today asking you to stand with GOProud. 

If you are going to be in DC for CPAC, please join us.  Below is a run-down of some of our plans for CPAC.  Whether you will be here for CPAC or won’t please support GOProud’s work -  Click here to contribute.

Wednesday, February 17, 6 pm – 8 pm – Join us for an informal happy hour at the Dupont Hotel Bar.  Click here for directions.  This will give GOProud folks a chance to meet and get to know each other before CPAC starts on Thursday. (We expect we’ll get together Thursday – Saturday nights too.  Stop by the GOProud booth any day during CPAC to see what’s planned for that evening.)

Thursday, February 18 – Saturday, February 20 - The focus of our CPAC efforts will be our GOProud information booth in the exhibit area near radio row.  This is our opportunity to talk about GOProud’s mission, answer questions, and grow our organization.  Please support GOProud’s CPAC booth by making a contribution to this important effort today

Saturday, February 20, 11 am - GOProud’s Jimmy LaSalvia will speak to CPAC about “Using Technology to Mobilize Conservatives.”  Click here for more information.

We hope that you will join us next week at CPAC!  There’s still time to register here.  If you can’t make it to Washington, we still need your help.  Remember, only one CPAC co-sponsor represents gay conservatives and their allies.  Please support GOProud today.  Click here to contribute.

In addition, I’ll be a speaker at a Blogger-Free-For-All panel hosted by BankofKev.  The panel is Thursday at 4:00PM.  Please come by the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel to say hello and support GOProud this week.

Oh yeah, I’ll be blogging and hopefully doing some videopodcasts too!  The one speech I’m definitely going to liveblog: MARCOOOO RUUUUBIOOOOO!

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

A Diva’s Thoughts on Palin Derangement Syndrome

Last week, I so liked a piece that Conservative Blogress Diva Regent Neo-neocon posted on Pajamas I printed it out.  Just read it again.  She really got at a phenomenon afflicting the chattering classes, often described as Palin Derangement Syndrome, but sometimes known by its more common name, “Palin-hatred”.

Last week, many of the former Alaska Governor’s detractors, rushed to judge her, smearing her speech, attacking a bracelet she wore and attempting the ancient art of palmistry on her exposed palm.  Neo-neocon found this rush to judgment par for the course when it comes to this charismatic conservative woman:

This rush to judgment is not the exception but rather the rule when criticizing Sarah. Palin-hatred is as old — and as persistent — as her presence on the national scene (that’s “hatred,” as distinguished from mere disagreement on issues). There have been countless explanations for it. If anything, the phenomenon is over-determined, representing a toxic brew of class warfare, misogyny, envy (much of this coming from women), and elitism.

One of the many things that so infuriates Palin-haters is that she has not adopted the proper veneer of bland sameness that most people in public life affect, a smoothness that often serves to even out idiosyncrasies of accent and regionalism. Ms. Palin refuses to do this. She sports not only a bracelet that marks her as the proud mother of a son who has been in the military, but an accent that marks her as from the far north and simultaneously as “country.”

Many people read the latter as “uneducated,” and therefore “stupid.” The assumption is that Palin doesn’t change these things — she continues to drop her “g’s” at the end of “ing” words, for example — because she cannot do so, rather than because she chooses not to do so. But that assumption may be as incorrect as so many of the other assumptions about Palin.

Those many false assumptions. Guess it’s that her detractors have a hard time understanding her appeal because, well, she’s just not the type of woman who’s supposed to succeed.  She’s conservative, she loves her husband (who happens to be hot), she has a passel of children, she doesn’t read Derrida (and thankfully, probably doesn’t know who he is).

Just read the whole thing, this diva (Neo-neocon) is onto something.