GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

House Republican Whip Decries Violence*

by

The House Majority Leader of the 112th Congress nails it on threats of violence and the current political climate:

(H/t: Commentary Contentions.)

*and attempts to use violent acts for political gain.

Comments

  1. Given the left’s history of violence, hatred, bigotry etc., manufacturing “hate crimes” AND Chairman Obama fundraising off of alleged threats of violence, I’m supposed to care……WHY?

  2. Rep Cantor is a Jew. I wonder if the liberal democrat who took a shot at him at his office was pro Obamacare or is an anti semite reacting to Obamas rubbing BeBes nose in crap yesterday. Either way taking his lead from the lovely liberals. Stop the violence Dems. And btw aren’t privately owned guns illegal in the district? Or is that just for conservatives…..

  3. The police concluded that this was a random bullet, most likely shot into the air and it happened to land in the congressman’s office. It came through the window at a steep downward angle with not enough force to even penetrate the interior shade and landed a foot inside the glass. Link

    Yes, that done on the Monday night before the vote to a congressman whose done everything he could to stop healthcare and a brick through several Democratic congressman’s regional office windows are about exactly the same.

    Could you actually, possibly, just perhaps, maybe consider that this statement was, oh I don’t know, perhaps politically motivated?

  4. #3: Oh, well, that’s great. A random bullet… we’ll all sleep better now.

    I suspect Cantor’s remarks were politically motivated (unlike the Dems who would only claim victimhood under pain of death).

    The Dems have been stoking a civil war in this country for years (angry white males, racists, sexists, homophobes, greedy rich, bitter clingers, gun nuts, xenophobes, and so on). Sooner or later, they will succeed in making it a hot civil war.

    I’ve thought for years that the Left was feeding a tiger they won’t be able to control and that will turn on all of us.

  5. Could you actually, possibly, just perhaps, maybe consider that this statement was, oh I don’t know, perhaps politically motivated?

    Hey, yeah! Those “Black Panthers” were just random blacks stopping people from voting. Maurice Schwenkler was just some random guy throwing bricks around for shits and giggles. A random group of thugs in purple t-shirts were just swinging their hands around when Kenneth Gladney got in the way. A random group of people were flailing about wildly in Orlando when the Bush HQ got in their way.

    Whatever, Cooterville.

  6. Could you actually, possibly, just perhaps, maybe consider that this statement was, oh I don’t know, perhaps politically motivated?

    Would CountdeVeil also apply this advise to Barney and the Congressional black passage that claimed to be maligned?

    At least, CountdeVeil, in Cantor’s case the cops came up with a bullet. Your boys can’t come up with evidence even with every second person shooting video.

    By the way, CountdeVail, how’s that coffin in the yard that Politico reported working out for your talking points?

    Yesterday, a KKK man dropped out of a tree and ate the front right tire off my car as I was speeding home and I almost jumped a ditch and killed a whole soccer team of autistic pre schoolers. The KKK man was wearing a Robert Byrd T-Shirt with the words “Reconciliation or Die” on it in letters of fire. Luckily, a Girl Scout selling cookies wrapped my tire in Obama stickers and I was able to limp home.