No Wonder the “Stimulus” Didn’t Create Jobs . . .
. . . but it may have keep some public employees on state payrolls. (Guess that’s what Obama meant about “saved.”)
One-third of the 2009 stimulus money went to state and local governments–an obvious payoff to the public employee unions which gave hundreds of millions of dollars to Democrats and got hundreds of billions of dollars in return, to insulate public employee unions from the effects of the recession which has affected everyone else.
What Obama and Boxer don’t seem to realize is that they—like Corzine and Coakley–are on the wrong end a taxpayer rebellion. For decades, Californians paid high taxes but got good services in return: good schools and roads, an excellent university system. But now, after favor after favor to the unions from their pliant political pawns, we have bloated payrolls, unfireable teachers who are the highest-paid in the nation, state workers who retire at 55 and make more money not working than when they were working.
6 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.








The stimulus was two parts, tax cuts and spending.
Its true the tax incentives did not bring on hiring as was hoped.
However, the spending stimulus provided jobs and valuable infrastructure improvements. Perhaps if Obama did not cut taxes for 95% of all Americans, and instead used ALL of the money in new spending, we would have more jobs.
Thankfully, the stimulus stopped the economic free fall we were in and hopefully Jobs will come now that we are stabilizing…
Comment by gillie — April 20, 2010 @ 9:47 pm - April 20, 2010
Such as….
Which taxes? If 46% of Americans don’t pay taxes, how can you cut taxes for 95% of Americans?
Sweet Jesus! How many trillions more have to be flushed down the crapper before you admit it’s doing nothing? How about infusing more capital into the private sector so they can start hiring people instead of kickbacks to the union bosses?
Look out! Il Douche is proclaiming that if we don’t hurry up and created a $50 BILLION slush fund for his Goldman buddies, it will happen again. So much for the $860 odd BILLION liberal slush fund.
Yeah and how long have we been “stabilizing” according to the left? How long’s that gonna take? And with Il Douche’s tools running around telling us that our current high unemployment is the new norm, why should we listen to a sack of wet flour like you?
Comment by ThatGayConservative — April 20, 2010 @ 10:09 pm - April 20, 2010
However, the spending stimulus provided jobs and valuable infrastructure improvements.
Like this?
You and your black Obama truly are delusional, gillie. You are arguing that jobs were “saved or created” in places that do not exist.
Do you think the fact that Obama has black skin and hates Jews means he can publicly spew delusions like this and not be called on it?
Comment by North Dallas Thirty — April 21, 2010 @ 12:18 am - April 21, 2010
My job was “saved or created” last year. Somehow, I wasn’t allowed to collect unemployment after being told by the state of Florida that I could. Ergo, as one who’s not counted amongst the elite unemployed, I’m not particularly interested if their benefits are extended or not.
Comment by ThatGayConservative — April 21, 2010 @ 1:15 am - April 21, 2010
Still waiting, ghillie.
Comment by ThatGayConservative — April 22, 2010 @ 2:39 am - April 22, 2010
[...] we remember Asian Conservatives: Why there won’t be an economic recovery under Obama GayPatriot: No Wonder the “Stimulus” Didn’t Create Jobs… Flopping Aces: Does This look like an Economic Recovery to You? Hot Air: Obama Claims to Be [...]
Pingback by Dems in Peril: NY Times Predicts Huge Democrat Losses in November, Sen. Graham Backing Away from Senate Climate Bill « Frugal Café Blog Zone — April 26, 2010 @ 11:06 am - April 26, 2010