Comments on: Another ‘Tolerant’ Socialist Hating on The Gays

By: longviewcyclist

longviewcyclist — Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:27:37 +0000

How ironic.

NOT!

By: American Elephant

American Elephant — Sat, 24 Apr 2010 04:38:36 +0000

Moo?

By: GayPatriot

GayPatriot — Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:00:10 +0000

By the way, tonight I ate veal. FWIW

By: JervisTetch

JervisTetch — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:27:46 +0000

Not all Statists loathe gays. The most tolerant and compassionate among them instead pity us and patronize us with truly the best intentions.

By: Michigan-Matt

Michigan-Matt — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:22:35 +0000

Ashp: “If I thought eating chicken would make me effeminate, I would quit eating chicken, too.”

Actually, I think eating chicken does make us more feminine and ladylike (kind of like yogurt) –all them whore-moans and stuff they stick in them baby chicks ‘fore they squeeze ‘em in them cages for life.

I heard at the laundromat that the reason them arkansaw chicken ranchers are stuffing the chicks with whore-moans is ’cause men in arkansaw is about as effemanit as you can be and not be gay yet. They don’t want no competition a’showin ‘em to be all girlie like… kind of like the Yankees. Have you ever seen a man from arkansaw who wasn’t a sissy or even had all his teeth? ‘taint possible, Ashp. If they weren’t no sissy, they’d be a transplant from somewhere else.

It’s a government conspiracy I tell ya. It started about the time the arkansaw chicken ranchers got a fellow Arkansaw-er elected president in ’92. Don’t never eat no chicken. Eagle is just as tasty.

By: Ashpenaz

Ashpenaz — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:00:33 +0000

Just to make a point, gay does not mean effeminate. This guy has bought the left-wing gay mythology that gay is about gender-bending flamboyance. Gay is about men loving men. There are lots of men in the Latino subculture who have sex with men but don’t consider themselves gay because they are not effeminate. Thank goodness for them, or roughly a third of my fantasy life would be gone. If I thought eating chicken would make me effeminate, I would quit eating chicken, too.

By: GayPatriot » Uncanny Yet Again

GayPatriot » Uncanny Yet Again — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:52:29 +0000

[...] Another ‘Tolerant’ Socialist Hating on The Gays [...]

By: LCRW

LCRW — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:35:44 +0000

The Argentine gay community has a President? I never heard about that election.

By: Jim Hlavac

Jim Hlavac — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:48:44 +0000

Socialists & Communists, like theologically “pure” Catholics, Protestants, Muslims and Jews (remember, any member of these groups who says nice things about gays are not “pure,”) — they don’t like gays for the same simple reason — which is well and often stated — gays don’t have kids — thus no New Socialists, etc, etc. They all use the same moral play book — the whole purpose of people is to produce more worker-bees for the glory of the state — and gays don’t procreate per se. Look at one of the main reasons offered against gay marriage: gays don’t procreate. Look at one of the main attacks on gays: we have to recruit. These six main forces of anti-gay rhetoric constantly define gayness as some political-choice–sin — and routinely deny any remote possibility that being gay is part of nature.

By: Michigan-Matt

Michigan-Matt — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:27:05 +0000

A sidebar question:

I know the Obamas aren’t nuts about releasing Birth Certificates, but does anyone know if they’ve released the names of a single gay couple they think of as social or mutual “friends”?

I don’t mean a couple that’s been found since the nomination… or some couple that have been employed in the WH… ’cause they had domestic terrorists babysitting the girls at one point… how threatening do the Obamas think gays could be?

Do they have any gay friends that haven’t been secured by political patronage or convenience?

By: jann

jann — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:41 +0000

The first time I came to this site I stated they hate women and gays, look how they treat them. Urkel gave them the ok after scolding the hecklers. Have you noticed the gay bashing was ratcheted up. They use them quite well and then off they go!

By: ILoveCapitalism

ILoveCapitalism — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:17:07 +0000

As for Tim W’s nonsense, let’s do a simple thought experiment. Let’s imagine Ortega the conservative harboring questionable beliefs about chickens, baldness and gays, and Morales opposing him.

Does anyone doubt for a moment that the gay- and left-wing blogospheres would be in full shriekfest? And making Morales, the Bolivian left-winger, into a new American gay hero?

By: ILoveCapitalism

ILoveCapitalism — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:54:31 +0000

Leftists secretly despise all the people/groups whom they delude and exploit. Gays, blacks, you name it. It’s a pattern.

By: pst314

pst314 — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:53:11 +0000

In some form or other this is a very old folk belief: Hundreds of years ago you could find plenty of men who would say that a man should not eat chickens or capons, only roosters.

By: The_Livewire

The_Livewire — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:24:23 +0000

The difference, Tim W, is that Morales seems to be our President’s kind of people, as well as being a socialist/communist like President Obama’s former Green Jobs Tsar, and like Anita Dunn.

Your ‘Republicans making a Theocracy’ is just your own fevered imagination.

By: Tim W

Tim W — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:26:19 +0000

Really??? Wow you went to Bolivia to try to smear everyone on the left. That’s like me comparing the Republicans to Saudi Arabia because they seem to want to create a theology in this country.

By: ThatGayConservative

ThatGayConservative — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:04:49 +0000

I don’t think he meant the manufactured & BS “progressive” that liberals pretend they are. He meant REAL progressive.

By: American Elephant

American Elephant — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:23:33 +0000

I saw the same story, and what I noticed was that leftists everywhere use people and HATE real scientific progress (in this case genetically modified crops)

But Dick Cheney? A progressive?