Gay Patriot Header Image

“Obama Bingo” or “In the Cards”

Posted by Sarjex at 7:21 pm - August 31, 2010.
Filed under: cartoons

Buy a shirt and help send me to CPAC! Questions, comments requests can be sent to sarjex (at) gmail dot com


Buy t-shirts

Share

14 Comments

  1. Very funny, I love it bro.

    Comment by Coco — August 31, 2010 @ 8:06 pm - August 31, 2010

  2. LOL, Sarjex, you are good at this! Very funny! Did you fill it in while you watching? Or, as I suspect, were you just able to predict this predictable president?

    Comment by American Elephant — August 31, 2010 @ 9:09 pm - August 31, 2010

  3. To me the speech was flat, unemotional and lacked any vision. His comment about Bush’s ‘support for the troops’ was condescending and since Obama opposed the Surge to begin with I am perplexed why he even gave this address. Perhaps it was to take a victory lap about his campaign promise to withdraw troops which made the speech about him once again.

    Comment by benj — August 31, 2010 @ 9:18 pm - August 31, 2010

  4. Nope…I filled it out before hand! His speeches really do write themselves…they’re like madlibs!

    Comment by Sarjex — September 1, 2010 @ 12:12 am - September 1, 2010

  5. Oh, was there a speech tonight?

    Comment by ThatGayConservative — September 1, 2010 @ 1:54 am - September 1, 2010

  6. haha Awsome!

    Well done!

    Comment by Stone K — September 1, 2010 @ 9:54 am - September 1, 2010

  7. To me the speech was flat, unemotional and lacked any vision. His comment about Bush’s ’support for the troops’ was condescending and since Obama opposed the Surge to begin with I am perplexed why he even gave this address. Perhaps it was to take a victory lap about his campaign promise to withdraw troops which made the speech about him once again.

    Do you seriously expect any close follower of American politics to believe that you wouldn’t have said exactly the same thing regardless of what he said?

    It’s really easy to come in after the fact and say that you’re not impressed when you haven’t laid out ahead of time what would and would not disappoint you. All I’ve heard from conservative commentators and media stars is that they thought Obama should praise Bush – he did exactly that! But it seemed condescending to you, oh well. Are we to believe that you’ve got incredibly high standards, or someone that hates Obama and everything he does reflexively?

    Comment by Levi — September 1, 2010 @ 11:32 am - September 1, 2010

  8. “It’s really easy to come in after the fact and say that you’re not impressed when you haven’t laid out ahead of time what would and would not disappoint you.”

    Almost as easy to say that the President lied, even when there’s no evidence he did, eh Levi.

    Still, it’s nice to see you’re pro-life now Levi.

    Comment by The_Livewire — September 1, 2010 @ 11:40 am - September 1, 2010

  9. Almost as easy to say that the President lied, even when there’s no evidence he did, eh Levi.

    Still, it’s nice to see you’re pro-life now Levi.

    Wow, is that an argument? Bush didn’t lie about Iraq? Do you think that’s how history will remember it?

    Comment by Levi — September 1, 2010 @ 11:51 am - September 1, 2010

  10. Wow, is Levi admitting Bush didn’t lie about Iraq, no matter how many times he says it?

    Point is, socialist, you’ve made it clear that no amount of facts will change your delusions. Whether it be on economics, science, history or politics. Yet here you accuse others of complaining because ‘they won’t say what would make them happy.”

    I don’t have to ‘argue’ with you. Your own words expose how you wrap igorance in pride. Arguing requires two rational beings. I am one. Still no proof you are.

    Comment by The_Livewire — September 1, 2010 @ 12:11 pm - September 1, 2010

  11. Wow, is that an argument? Bush didn’t lie about Iraq? Do you think that’s how history will remember it?

    Hey sweetie, 2004 called. He wants his meme back.

    Comment by Eric in Chicago — September 1, 2010 @ 1:24 pm - September 1, 2010

  12. Wow, is that an argument? Bush didn’t lie about Iraq? Do you think that’s how history will remember it?

    Its how the non-partisan and bi-partisan 9/11 Commission, the Senate Select Intelligence Committee Report on Pre-War Intelligence, the Dulfer Report, the House Permanent Select Intelligence Committee, the Robb-Silbermann Commission, and the Lord Butler Report in Great Britain ALREADY remember them. The only losers who will believe Bush lied are the same ignorant cranks who get their disinformation spoonfed to them by MSNBC’s angry Mr. Maddow and Keith Odorpants.

    Which is why Mr. Madcow blew a gasket at Obama’s speech last night. Better go review it, youve got your talking points wrong!

    Comment by American Elephant — September 1, 2010 @ 4:41 pm - September 1, 2010

  13. Its how the non-partisan and bi-partisan 9/11 Commission, the Senate Select Intelligence Committee Report on Pre-War Intelligence, the Dulfer Report, the House Permanent Select Intelligence Committee, the Robb-Silbermann Commission, and the Lord Butler Report in Great Britain ALREADY remember them. The only losers who will believe Bush lied are the same ignorant cranks who get their disinformation spoonfed to them by MSNBC’s angry Mr. Maddow and Keith Odorpants.

    Would you care to explain how any of those things vindicate the truth-telling abilities of the Bush administration in the slightest? If all the after-the-invasion reports and commissions concluded that there weren’t weapons, connections to terrorists, or even any real evidence of either of those things…. how does that prove George Bush wasn’t lying when he said over and over again that he was sure that there was?

    I really don’t feel like doing this again. It’s pretty pathetic that the standard response to any liberal mentioning the wars is to dismissively whine that Bush didn’t lie!! I said absolutely nothing about George Bush’s conducting of the war in this thread. You’re complete children if this is the direction that you want to take the discussion.

    Comment by Levi — September 2, 2010 @ 12:46 am - September 2, 2010

  14. I said absolutely nothing about George Bush’s conducting of the war in this thread.

    Except for, of course, where you did.

    Wow, is that an argument? Bush didn’t lie about Iraq? Do you think that’s how history will remember it?

    Now, Levi, please state for the record that every single one of these organizations listed in this quote is lying.

    Its how the non-partisan and bi-partisan 9/11 Commission, the Senate Select Intelligence Committee Report on Pre-War Intelligence, the Dulfer Report, the House Permanent Select Intelligence Committee, the Robb-Silbermann Commission, and the Lord Butler Report in Great Britain ALREADY remember them.

    Also please state that every one of the Obama Party members quoted herein is lying.

    And also, please state that your Barack Obama lied when he said that our military’s actions in Iraq made America safer.

    Or run away as you always do when you can’t answer. You are rather amusing and pathetic that way, little child. Such a coward, such a failure, such an ignorant idiot — that’s what people say about Levi, both online and in the real world.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — September 3, 2010 @ 6:04 pm - September 3, 2010

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.