“In all seriousness,” Ed Morrissey asks
. . . what does it take for a Democrat to lose an endorsement from the National Organization of Women? Choosing Larry Flynt as a campaign manager? Would that at least have them hold off for at least a couple of days in order to make the endorsement not seem as blatantly partisan and mindless as their endorsement of Jerry Brown just hours after discovering that his campaign strategized over painting opponent Meg Whitman as a “whore”?
. . . .
Whitman showed that women can succeed at the highest levels of the private sector with her incredible leadership at eBay, and that women can turn that success into political force. That flies in the face of their need to hype victimization over self-determination, and demand the expansion of government interventions to dictate outcomes rather than create an equitable environment in which all can compete equally and win or lose based on their talent, drive, and fortunes.
Read the whole thing. Hugh notes the media double standard:
Imagine if a GOP candidate for governor or senator in any high profile race in the land was heard on tape either uttering the word “whore” about his Democratic woman opponent or not reacting to his aide using the term in regard to that opponent –what would the reaction of the MSM be to the story?
Of course NOW has endorsed Brown. They’re whores.
Now, Sean, if you keep talking like that, you too may win the NOW endorsement!
Dan, please don’t talk about it–you’ll only jinx my chances.
BUT, at the risk of jinxing it myself, I don’t need to tell you that NOW’s endorsement would go a LONG WAY with the awards committee at Planned Parenthood. I mean, if I could head into the killing babies award season with a fresh endorsement from NOW, I would have a real shot at winning the Margaret Sanger award, which as you know is basically like, the infanticide industry’s OSCAR (I call it the “Maggie.”)
I had planned to throw my hat into the ring for this year’s Maggie by having a professional photographer do a photo shoot of me actually assisting a doctor in performing a partial bir-…oops! I mean, LATE TERM WOMEN’S MEDICAL PROCEDURE (wink! wink!), and then placing “for your consideration” ads in all of the usual industry publications, but unfortunately this year the awards committee is totally cracking down on all of the shameless campaigning because it was “getting out of control.”
And it kind of WAS getting out of control–who could forget last year’s big-money campaigns for Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, and Kathleen Sebelius–I mean, HELLO, how many glossy ads do we have to see of these women flashing their big fake horsey grins and trying to outdo each other by holding up increasingly bigger and bigger jars with bigger and bigger dead babies floating in them? I mean, God! Try to show some dignity ladies! It’s like, OKAY, we get it BITCHES–you like, support abortion and want to get an award for it–now cut the passive-aggressive campaign war! Besides, Pelosi’s campaign totally blew up in her face when that unfortunate rumor got started that the baby in HER jar was actually one of her grandkids (lol–you just KNOW Sebelius got that one rolling–she is RUTHLESS when some other bitch politician tries to claim that she loves killing babies more than Sebelius does).
Let’s face it, when it comes to women who spent their lives tirelessly working to integrate “weeding out undesirables” into the fabric of mainstream society, nobody can touch Sanger and it would be SUCH AN HONOR to receive an award named after her. So, keep your fingers crossed for me on that endorsement from the National Organization for Whores. Thanks! :0
NOW is simply an arm of the Democrat Party; principles does not matter–only political power.
NOW is simply an arm of the Democrat Party; principles does not matter–only political power.
If by”arm” you mean “tentacle.” NOW, HRC, NARAL, SEIU, AFT, NEA, AFL-CIO, ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, ACLU, UAW … they are all tentacles of the socialist kraken.
The motivation behind the final success of the woman’s suffrage movement may not be what people remember it to be. The 19th Amendment may have only been allowed to pass because the outcome gave Woodrow Wilson, a ‘Progressive Democrat’, an electoral advantage.
Google these three terms, and see what i mean:
– Women’s Suffrage
– Prohibition
– Ku Klux Klan
.
NOW are Fembots:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPvf58_nPRw&feature=related
Remember the diabolical Fembots from the Bionic Woman?