Earlier today, a friend of mine indicated on Facebook that she likes her wife’s status, that latter having signed up for a rather mature group calling on people to “Subversively move George W. Bush’s memoir to crime section in book shops”. What grown-ups!
Now, I should note that I have the profoundest respect for these two women, indeed, it was seeing them together on the eve of the 2008 election that ended my wavering on Prop 8. I had been so offended by the nasty tone of the Prop 8 opponents that I had considered leaving the ballot measure blank. But, aware of their relationship, I realized that some same-sex couples who sought state recognition of their relationships as marriages understood what marriage meant. I voted, “No.”
That said, through this post, let me ask (in a slightly revised manner) the question, I asked in my Facebook comment, “How would you react if conservatives organized the same scheme for the book by a prominent Democrat?”
What this Facebook group shows is that nearly two years this good man, but flawed chief executive left office, some on the left can’t let go of him. He’s gone, fellas, and ain’t coming back — and has had the decency to refrain from criticizing his successor — or otherwise interjecting himself into the political arena.
Those still obsessed with George W. Bush should do themselves a favor — and, to borrow an expression, just move on. He sure has.
If they want to be subversive, not just pretentious: they should try flying to Saudi Arabia and establishing a Planned Parenthood clinic or something. A gay youth workshop.
I think I may pick up Chairman Obama’s books and move them to the Gents’.
Actually, President Bush has very deftly voiced his disapproval of Obama. By saying that he wouldn’t want to criticize him, he has implicitly admitted that if he had anything to say, it would be criticism.
And I think the proper place for any pro-Obama books would be the fiction section.
I have found Obama’s books in the toilet tissue aisle of my supermarket…
Leave George Bush Alone. (That would make a great You Tube video – but I wonder if it has been done before.)
I don’t think I will ever read any book wrtten by Obama..seems years ago I got over reading anything that begins..”once upon a time”….
That was my reply, move President Obama’s to fiction. (or maybe horror)
The Democrats have been hammering Herbert Hoover’s record and reputation for over 80-years, so why should they treat George H. Bush any differently?
Umm… Hoover did contribute mightily to the Depression; just in the exact opposite way of what Democrats/leftists want people to think.
The GOP President whose negative reputation from the Democrats is least deserved might be Harding, who had the right response to the Depression of 1920. Leftists want people to remember the Teapot Dome Scandal, but read about it sometime; it had little or nothing to do with Harding, and seems almost quaintly innocent – almost – compared to the corrupt mess of Barney Frank / Chris Dodd / Freddie / Fannie / Countrywide / housing bubble / TARP / Wall Street bailouts, that we’ve had lately.
They keep looking backwards, at an earlier President, because they’re afraid to look forward to the destructive future their own policies are wreaking.
Eric Hines
President Bush has shown such grace in his conduct. He is a class act
Dan, I think the answer lies in the need of Dem leaders to feed red meat to the base –Cheney and Bush and Rumsfeld and Scooter are the red meat to linger over, to recall and refresh the Left’s sense of outrage and all of that leads to the ultimate vindication of their position by electing Obama, keeping the fiction alive that Bush lied about WMDs, et al.
We do it with Carter or Clinton or Gore… in a sort of testament that “we” were right in assessing those men as terribly flawed characters with supremely incompetent records.
Conservatives have the whole “derangement syndrome” cliche and liberals try to tack “-gate” onto just about anything that approaches the merest whiff of impropriety.
It’s part of the game and Bush 43 is wise enough to know the best response is to ignore and appear to all it doesn’t bother him or his family.
For Bush 43, it works. I think Americans appreciate that higher ground position of Bush… it certainly is better than Clinton’s and Carter’s 24×7 media attraction action plan.
By the absurd metrics that conservatives on this board and across this country have judged George W. Bush, it is literally impossible for someone to lie, just so long as they at some point qualify their statements by indicating that they ‘got some bad intel.’ Gee, I hope someday that I can become the head of a sprawling organization the size of the federal government, so that I may self-absolve myself of all sins and accountability by pointing to some vague group of low-level functionaries and pinning it all on them. Obviously, this only works if you have legions of self-deceiving rubes who treat you like a religious icon, so I’ll have to get that in place as well.
And for what? This guy is more directly responsible for the terrible shape of the economy than anyone, committed all kinds of supposedly grave conservative sins by turning a budget surplus into a huge deficit, and literally has the blood of thousands of American service men and women on his hands – but oh, he’s just got a few flaws. Sometimes I misspell, sometimes I get speeding tickets, sometimes Bush invades the wrong country! See? We’re all the same!
Has Barack Obama ever lied about anything? You fellas seem to toss that accusation around pretty frequently, and haven’t you made a hero of the guy who blurted it out during the State of the Union? If Bush is still a good guy who just makes some mistakes, then why can’t Obama be a good guy who just makes some mistakes?
Finally – Bush hasn’t been talking because nobody wants to listen to him. You’re the most gullible group of airheads alive if you actually believe he’s doing it to stay above the fray and out of respect for the presidency – his political irrelevance is forced upon him much to his chagrin. The country is demonstrably worse off having had him as our leader and people are sick of him. It’s no coincidence that he’s doing this press tour after the election is over, I mean did you all just get off the boat or what?
Oh.
Levi again misses the base.
The conservative posters recognize lies and liars. We call Levi out on his all the time.
“If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.”
“What I’ve done throughout this campaign is to propose a net spending cut…I want to go through the federal budget line by line, page by page, programs that don’t work, we should cut.”
“Bill Ayers is just a guy in my neighborhood.”
“I don’t want to run car companies…” (said just before he nationalized GM and Chrysler.)
Barack Obama in 2003, talking to the AFL/CIO:“I happen to be a proponent of single-payer universal healthcare coverage. ” Barack Obama in 2008. ”I never said that we should try to go ahead and get single-payer.”
Barack Obama in 2004: ““I can unequivocally say I will not be running for national office in four years, and my entire focus is making sure that I’m the best possible senator on behalf of the people of Illinois.”
“Every economist who’s looked at it says that the Recovery Act has done its job”
He also promised to run the most transparent administration in history… then went on to sign a “Financial Reform Law” that exempts the SEC from the Freedom of Information Act.
V, I don’t have time atm to look up exact quotes, but (yet) another would be Porkulus and “shovel-ready jobs”. 2009 he claims it’s what Porkulus is all about… 2010 he admits to David Brooks that he was lying to us. Reference: http://hotair.com/archives/2010/10/16/brooks-hey-obama-told-me-shovel-ready-jobs-didnt-exist-last-year/
This sort of behavior is nothing new. Liberals have been hiding (and vandalizing) onservative books for a long time. It’s how they show that they are tolerant of dissent.
Levi, I’m not sure your reduction of “the prez made some mistakes, but he’s a good guy” is even close.
The threads at GP are often exposed to the same kind of Bush-bashing nonsense from farRighties and faux-indies that one can routinely find on HuffPo and DailyKos.
I think the difference is that for your side (I’m assuming you’re a gayLeftie with strong attachment to the Dem party) is that the Bush-bashing is almost a freakish fetish for you all.
That’s ok. Bush and his family aren’t bothered by it. He’s got the moral high ground and if Obama wants to resurrect his fortunes after losing the WH, the Senate and helping the GOP gain even more seats in the House in 2012, he’ll take note and follow his wiser, more seasoned predecessor and stay quiet during Romney’s 1st and 2nd terms as CIC.
It’s the manly thing to do… even for an avowed metrosexual.
Levi, you have entered a fact-free zone. This misnamed blog is the anti-gay, anti-America home of V.oice of the K.lan and his followers of screeds and scummy slurs. V.oice of the K.lan is apparently the other screen name of B. Daniel Blatt. He defends this guy because he is this guy.
Blatt/Voice of the Klan, et al, attack America’s government in the name of patriotism (they are Confederates) and they attack gays in the name of being pro-gay, but you will find more virulent homophobia here than anywhere. And the war crimes of W. have all been ignored so that they can focus on the biirth certificate “issue.” They support politicians who deny global warming, evolution and the GOP’s most non-thinking fundamentalists. The lunacy in the GOP/T party led to this international story just yesterday:
A Republican congressman hoping to chair the powerful House Energy Committee refers to the Bible and God on the issue of global warming.
Representative John Shimkus insists we shouldn’t concerned about the planet being destroyed because God promised Noah it wouldn’t happen again after the great flood.
Speaking before a House Energy Subcommittee on Energy and Environment hearing, Shimkus quoted Chapter 8, Verse 22 of the Book of Genesis.
He said: ‘As long as the earth endures, seed time and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, will never cease.’
The Illinois Republican continued: ‘I believe that is the infallible word of God, and that’s the way it is going to be for his creation.
‘The earth will end only when God declares its time to be over. Man will not destroy this earth. This earth will not be destroyed by a flood.
He added: ‘Today we have about 388 parts per million in the atmosphere. I think in the age of dinosaurs, when we had the most flora and fauna, we were probably at 4,000 parts per million. There is a theological debate that this is a carbon-starved planet — not too much carbon. And the cost of a cap-and-trade on the poor is now being discovered.’
The Republican is a vocal opponent to President Obama’s American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 – the so-called ‘cap-and-trade’ Bill, aimed at limiting carbon emissions.
The Bill passed the House of Representatives last year, but has yet to pass the Senate.
A Nasa thermal satellite image showing the world’s arctic surface temperature trends during autumn between 1981 and 2008. Temperatures have increased over the Arctic due to dramatic recent decline in sea ice cover
A Nasa thermal satellite image showing the world’s arctic surface temperature trends during autumn between 1981 and 2008. Temperatures have increased over the Arctic due to dramatic recent decline in sea ice cover
Shimkus, who has served on the committee since 1997, will likely be competing against Texas Representative Joe Barton and Michigan Congressman Fred Upton for the leadership soon.
In a letter to fellow Republican Congressmembers, Shimkus says: ‘I believe I have the credentials within the Commitee to bring fairness, without protests from the other side of the aisle, in its operation.’
He adds that ‘now is not the time to moderate or compromise on our most deeply held values’.
It is not the first time Shimkus has sparked surprise. In May 2007, he compared the Iraq war to a baseball game between his ‘beloved’ St Louis Cardinals and the ‘much despised’ Chicago Cubs.
He also hit the headlines in 2009 when he walked out as President Obama delivered a speech to a joint session of the House and the Senate.
The Committee on Energy and Commerce, to give it its full title, is one of the oldest standing committees of the United States House of Representatives having been established in 1795.
It takes a central role in formulating U.S. policy on climate change and global warming
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1328366/John-Shimkus-Global-warming-wont-destroy-planet-God-promised-Noah.html#ixzz1505GSnUO
Awwww, equality4Jerome continues the slander (or is it libel?) against our host, and V the K, apparently the accusations and slander previously given by e4J didn’t have the desired effect. Poor baby’s upset that he was found out to be posting under two seperate names, then caught when his story kept changing.
Hint sock-puppet-boy, when you’re agreeing with an admitted socialist, who believes that brown people aren’t capable of accepting democracy, you’ve already lost.
“A Nasa thermal satellite image showing the world’s arctic surface temperature trends during autumn between 1981 and 2008. Temperatures have increased over the Arctic due to dramatic recent decline in sea ice cover”
more ice As anyone who watches Dealiest Catch can tell you.
reality
Despite NASA stonewalling, CEI has already learned, for example, that NASA does not, contrary to widespread media and pressure group claims, have an independent temperature data set. Instead, as NASA told USA Today in an e-mail, despite its serial, breathless press releases trumpeting some new temperature high, it actually is just a modeling office, which also (for unknown reasons, possibly extra attention and importance, or mere advocacy) cobbles together some U.S. data from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) with that of the Climatic Research Unit’s temperature history. You may recall how CRU withdrew its claim to a temperature history data set after Climategate led to an admission it actually lost its data.
Sorry, the truth is I don’t really believe B. Daniel Blatt is V. the K. anymore than I believe James and I are the same person, I was just playing the game the way it was played on me and my boyfriend.
None of us on this blog know who is really on here. Even B. Daniel may very well be a pen name rather than a real one.
The anonymity of the blog is what allows the vicious anti-gay attacks with the four letter words. These “brave” conservatives are so confident in their positions that anyone who comes on here to even ask a question will be blasted with the most personal attacks possible. So, I got into the gutter with you all for a while, but you can blast away now because I won’t be back to read your disgusting messages. I am gone forever from the Anti-Gay, Anti-American blog. James says, the American Elephant got her name due to her weight.
FIFY.
Spoken like someone who has never gone to DailyKos and asked, “Do we really have to slam Sarah Palin all the time?”
friend, partner, boyfriend… equality4Jerome keeps changing the story.
President Bush is the very antithesis of the prefabricated Obama; therefore, he elicits various emotions. Bush is the real thing while the only thing real about Obama is he is the personification of incompetent Marxism.
#26: Speaking of Obama, where is our President today (Veterans’ Day)? Oh yeah, he’s been busy in Indonesia helping them celebrate their “Heroes’ Day” (Indonesia’s Veterans’ Day). That, and making speeches to Muslims about how Americans need to work harder to understand Muslims.
waiter-Jerome in #20 informs us thusly:
Now, apparently, when a member or Congress quotes the Bible and babbles about God he is violating the liberal code of moral relevancy and trying to force religion down everyone’s throat.
However, waiter-Jerome, where is there any inference whatsoever that these words conflict with your religious belief in the ironclad scientific fact of man caused global warming?
‘As long as the earth endures, seed time and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, will never cease.’ So, no matter what man may do, the Earth abides? Just how do you base your objection to these words?
‘The earth will end only when God declares its time to be over. Man will not destroy this earth. This earth will not be destroyed by a flood. Naturally, you would insist on flushing the God part, but what is your objection to the rest of the statement?
Your ridicule seems to be totally aimed at the religious belief of the speaker. If it is more than that, show us how the words are false or meaningless or stupid or whatever.
Edumacate us, waiter-Jerome.
I’m STILL waiting for a liberal to explain to me how a $162 billion deficit can be considered “record deficits”, but $1.3 TRILLION isn’t. I’m still waiting for someone to explain how that makes us better off economically. However, I can’t find one single liberal with the balls to explain it. You just keep repeating it hoping like all hell there’s enough stupid people out there who will believe it’s true. I know damn well you don’t stow the gear necessary to back up your claims though.
Goebbles would be proud of you.
He has said, at least twice, that invading Iraq made us less safe. Then a few months ago, he told our troops that they have made us more safe. One of those statements is a lie.
It was a true statement and it still is. The liberals have NEVER proved that it wasn’t. They just kept repeating the lie with the belief that Americans are too stupid to know better.
Here again, Goebbles would be proud.
I’m fairly certain you made the same promise a week ago and yet here you are.
Here’s Dana Milbank (Washington Post) trying to “capitalize” on the warm reception that Bush is getting.
Doesn’t he remember the “Elections have consequences” speech? (Barbara Boxer, 2007)
——————
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/10/AR2010111006303.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
I miss him because in the end he was willing to toss aside his ideological orthodoxy when the national interest required it – a trait conspicuously absent among his fellow conservatives these last two years.
.
Yes, this guys’ religious belief is the problem. People making public environmental policy decisions based on fairy tales about Noah and the flood is the very definition of forcing your religion down others’ throats. This moron would have been better off living in the 11th century.
I’m not sure what the actual spending amounts have to do with my assertion that Bush is primarily responsible for the bad shape of the economy, but I’ll answer your question. I’ve never seen anyone claim that 1.3 trillion isn’t a record deficit. Obviously, that number is bigger than 162 (where are you getting that from, anyway?), so that’s the record if that’s what you’re so worried about.
The truth of the matter is that huge portions of Obama’s deficit is because of Bush’s military excursions and his tax cuts. These were terrible policies that reduced government revenues and added all kinds of useless spending. Even by conservatives’ fantasy-based standards, Bush’s economic performance was a complete disaster, and as pissed as you guys are about Obama’s spending, you should have nothing nice to say about Bush at all.
It’s possible to believe that the Iraq war made us less safe while expressing appreciation for the security that military personnel provide. One thing you lizard-brain conservatives have done since we started the war was conflate ‘Iraq’ with ‘troops.’ Back then, if you didn’t support the war, you didn’t support the troops! Today, if the Iraq war made us less safe, the troops made us less safe! No lie there at all.
Do you even remember what Obama was talking about when he shouted it out? Or is that irrelevant? Was Wilson saying that Obama was lying about something specific, or was just a big, stupid, liar in general?
Fixed it for our resident racist.
Is anyone else as entertained as I am that Levi can continue to lie about no WMD in Iraq, claim President bush lied about WMD in Iraq with no evidence yet he gets into verbal contortions to claim that President Obama’s statements aren’t lies?
I just want everyone to know that I think Obama has lied about quite a few things, though many of the examples you have given aren’t lies by any stretch of the imagination. The point I am trying to make is that if I wanted to, I could take any example you could provide and parse the words enough that I could show that it isn’t a lie, according to the standard that you’ve provided George Bush when ti comes to his war claims.
Importantly, the things I’ve seen brought up amount to things like campaign promises and budget projections – with Bush, we’re talking about domestic wiretapping, torture programs, and wars. There is a very big severity discrepancy between what you’re accusing Obama of and what I’m accusing Bush of, which is important to take into account. A politician being a politician and trying to be all things to all people while running in an election is one thing, trumping a bunch of bogus evidence so that you can invade a country is another thing entirely.
Yes, the big difference, Levi, is your ‘war crimes’ only exist in your fevered information. Even your vaunted ‘Wikileaks’ source shows WMD existed Syria and Iran are arming and killing our enemies.
But hey, keep spouting your lies and your racist screeds. They’re so easy to debunk.
“fevered imagination” bah, multitasking when sick sucks.
And just because smacking a racist like Levi with a stick is fun, here’s a Newsbusters article busting Rachel
Levier Maddow’s Bagdad Bob statements.Ta Da!
Nothing the Congressman quoted or said is “environmental policy” or in conflict with stewardship of the Earth. The man made global warming doomsayers can not make their case, so they attack religion. Typical, mindless, foolish consistency which illuminates the hobgobblins of their bigoted minds.
Levi, you think and respond like a stalwart Ku Klux Klan knuckle dragger.
The Congressman’s words and quotes failed to put the words you really wanted to hear in his mouth. You wanted him to say: “God will take of things, so lets rape and pillage the Earth and have a good time doing it.” But, he didn’t. He just said, in so many words: “We can not destroy the Earth, because no matter what, the Earth abides.”
From that simple and profound truth, Levi and his band of bigots want him pilloried for religious crimes against elitism and moral relevancy. Stunning.
Wikileaks documents show WMDs found in Iraq
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/10/24/wikileaks-documents-show-wmds-found-in-iraq/
————–
Finding residual evidence of a program “that never existed” is like finding a blood trail where no one was injured?
.
Yes, he did. That’s precisely the implication of invoking the Bible and God when talking about the planet lasting forever – it doesn’t matter what we do because we’re all just pawns on a chessboard. If God doesn’t want it to happen then it won’t, if he does want it to happen it will, and humanity has absolutely no input. This is one of the great failures of religion, that it explicitly teaches people not to be responsible because hey, God’s calling the shots.
This isn’t the issue – the issue is whether or not human beings will be able to survive on this planet and what kind of quality of life we will have. No one believes the planet is going to somehow cease to exist in the near future, it’s a question of how filthy and disgusting it gets and how scarce resources will become. Your God isn’t going to let the planet be destroyed? Okay great, well how about the rest of us?
I’m not a bigot – this guy is making scientific claims by waving a Bible around. That’s insanity anywhere, but to do it as a Congressman? It’s a complete mockery of Western civilization and the secular government that was founded here 230 years ago. If it makes me an elitist to make fun of morons that are trying to legislate based on their belief in fairy tales, I’ll gladly take the label.
The key word there is residual, as in defunct, as in leftovers. Finding a few dozen rusted out shells with trace amounts of chemicals in them is not surprising and is not a justification for an invasion which was pitched as an effort to prevent nuclear weapons from being deployed.
*yawn* Levi lies *again*
For those of us based in reality, let’s not forget that under the cease fire, those weapons were to be destroyed. They weren’t. That’s all the justification we needed, Saddam arbrogated the cease fire several times over. Levi likes saying that Saddam didn’t have NBC, but it’s clear he did.
Again, from the Duefler Report:
“The former Regime had no formal written strategy or plan for the revival of WMD after sanctions. Neither was there an identifiable group of WMD policy makers or planners separate from Saddam. Instead, his lieutenants understood WMD revival was his goal from their long association with Saddam and his infrequent, but firm, verbal comments and directions to them. (emphasis added)
ISG uncovered information that the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) maintained throughout 1991 to 2003 a set of undeclared covert laboratories to research and test various chemicals and poisons, primarily for intelligence operations. (key findings, “Chemical”)
The Regime made a token effort to comply with the disarmament process, but the Iraqis never intended to meet the spirit of the UNSC’s resolutions. Outward acts of compliance belied a covert desire to resume WMD activities. Several senior officials also either inferred or heard Saddam say that he reserved the right to resume WMD research after sanctions. (“Looking Ahead to Resume WMD programs”)
Hat Tip to Newsbusters for doing the leg work.
Levi can lie. He can pretend posts debunking his lies don’t exist. But the little coward is busy worshipping his false god of ‘man made global warmong’ while adults are talking here.
I think the lefties need to edit the Wikipedia entry to exclude all the statements that don’t jive with their story.
“Those are all pre-Gulf War (Aug, 1990 – Feb, 1991) chemical weapons that were found!”
———————
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#UNSCOM_inspections_1991-1998
In August 1991 Iraq had declared to the UNSCOM biological inspection team that it did indeed have a biological weapons program but that it was for defensive purposes.[55] Iraq then provided its first biological weapons declaration shortly after. After UNSCOM determined such declarations to be incomplete, more pressure was placed on Iraq to declare fully and completely.[55] A second disclosure of the biological weapons came in March 1995. After UNSCOM’s investigations and the discovery of inreffutable evidence, Iraq was forced to admit for the fist time the existence of an offensive biological weapons program.[55] But Iraq still denied weaponization. Further UNSCOM pressure resulted in a third prohibited biological weapons disclosure from Iraq in August 1995. Only after General Hussein Kamel al-Majid, Minister of Industry and Minerals and former Director of Iraq’s Military Industrialization Corporation, with responsibility for all of Iraq’s weapons programs, fled Iraq for Jordan, Iraq was forced to reveal that its biological warfare program was much more extensive than was previously admitted and that the program included weaponization.[55] At this time Iraq admitted that it had achieved the ability to produce longer-range missiles than had previously been admitted to.[55] At this point Iraq provides UNSCOM and IAEA with more documentation that turns out Hussein Kamel al-Majid had hidden on chicken farm. These documents gave further revelation to Iraq’s development of VX gas and its attempts to develop a nuclear weapon.[55] More declarations would follow in June 1996 and September 1997. However, in April and July 1998, the biological weapons team and UNSCOM Executive Chairman assessed that Iraq’s declarations were as of yet “unverifiable” and “incomplete and inadequate”, seven years after the first declarations were given in 1991.[55]
.
Because it’s friday…
Democrats call for science, well except when they make stuff up.
Once again, Levi’s false god takes another hit.
“As long as the earth endures, seed time and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, will never cease.”
It’s a pleasure to read the good side of this discussion. Levi’s beliefs are, of course, delusional. But I’ve occasionally felt like a voice in the wilderness on some of these matters, especially Iraq. It’s nice to see others who get it, stepping in with ready facts.
P.S. Is it just me, or is it kind of… odd… that Iran apparently has no gratitude whatever, that the U.S. took such trouble to (successfully) de-fang Saddam? Perhaps the people do, it’s just the Mullahs / autocratic regime of Iran that don’t. The latter are nearly as bad as Saddam, and now have U.S. troops on both their eastern and western borders.
Levi read that business about man having dominion over the earth and the seas and the wittle fishies and the flowers and the big rock candy mountains and now he wants to save mankind.
But, what if man is evolving out of his dinosaur stage? Apparently, Levi wants to outthink evolution. Or something.
Oh Darwin! The lad is so confused. Guess he should go pillory a Bible thumper. That should not only make him feel better, but it gets right to the heart of all of the problems in the world.
Gird up you twiggy loins, Levi, you have a man’s work to do. And blow your nose.
Does any of this make sense to anyone?
Am I supposed to respond to something in there?
Aww, poor Levi’s confused. Must be all the weblinks and everything. You know all those facts getting in the way of his false god of global warming.
More facts Levi is allergic to.
It’s a meta-point. At your expense. A very funny one. Three reasons why you *can’t* get it. Which is in itself is an additional meta-point, at your expense, that’s funny. Which is in itself an additional meta-point, at your expense, that’s funny. And so on. It’s sort of recursive structure… that you will never ‘get’.
Sad, uncomprehending Levi, let’s go back to this claim in #42:
What scientific claim did “the man” make …. and forger the Bible waving …. just identify the scientific claim….
The clock is ticking …..
tick …..
tick …..
tick …..
So wait, are you asserting that he wasn’t making a scientific claim when he says that the earth will only end when God wants it to?
I’m not getting it. You are being awfully cocky for seemingly having absolutely no argument. What is your point?
See Levi
See Levi backpedal.
Backpedal Levi, backpedal!
One thing I have learned in the markets, these last couple years: Fools are valuable and important. Because they take the other side of my trades. A smart person can’t trade successfully, without them.
Gotcha !!!!
Spell it out please. I am too plain dumb to see it.
What scientific claim was he making when he said the earth will only end when God wants it to?
Tick …..
Tick …..
Tick …..
Yeah…. so…. I’m tired of…. whatever it is you’re doing. I have an idea, make a point if you’ve got one?
You realize that speculating on when the Earth is going to end is making a scientific claim, don’t you? It doesn’t matter if your source is decades worth of data collection or invoking Jesus. If you’re talking about a real thing and what’s going to happen in the real world, you’re making a scientific claim.
Well, Levi just conceeded defeat, again. The only surprising thing is he didn’t limp away and just pretend that the thread never existed.
Oh, and more SCIENCE! to refute Levi, this time on environmental rebound. link.