GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Kenyan Prime Minister (and Obama Cousin) Rounds Up Gays

by

I guess real Hope & Change for The Gays comes at the expense of everyone in the Obama Family.

Prime Minister Raila Odinga has ordered a nationwide crackdown on homosexuals in Kenya.

Mr Odinga on Sunday said that police should arrest anyone found engaging in such behaviours and take appropriate legal action against them.

“We will not tolerate such behaviours in the country. The constitution is very clear on this issue and men or women found engaging in homosexuality will not be spared,” Mr Odinga said.

“Any man found engaging in sexual activities with another man should be arrested. Even women found engaging in sexual activities will be arrested,” the premier warned.

Speaking at a public rally at the Kamukunji grounds in his Nairobi’s Kibera constituency on Sunday afternoon, the Prime Minister cited the recent population census results which put the ratio of men to women equal and wondered why people should engage in homosexuality.

“This [homosexual] kind of behaviours will not be tolerated in this country. Men or women found engaging in those acts deserve to be arrested and will be arrested,” he told a hilarious crowd.

Jim at GatewayPundit reports:

While visiting Kenya as a guest of the government Obama campaigned with opposition leader socialist Raila Odinga, who claims he is Obama’s cousin.

Don’t expect any of the American Gay Leftist Lickspittles to protest this Obama family state-sponsored action.

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Comments

  1. Why are you repeating a soundly unsubstantiated statement of a dictator? Odinga made this statement nearly 3 years ago, and no proof has ever been found to substantiate his claim by any source. Obama’s real uncle from Kenya has stated that Odinga’s mother was from the same area as members of Obama’s family.

    Truth is, it’s actually a documented fact that President Obama is an 8th cousin of former vice-president Dick Cheney and 11th cousin of GW Bush. This information was found out by documented research.

    But then again, why should you let actual facts fly in the face of your mis-statements?

  3. #1 – I guess for Kevvie here, “denial” is just a river in Egypt.

    Had this been someone in Western Europe or Russia, and they were 100th cousins of Sarah Palin, he would have been in hysterics showing how “raaaaaaaaaaacist” everyone was.

    Try again, you JACKWAGON.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  5. Imagine what the Gay Left’s reaction to Bush would have been, if f Bush had campaigned with/for an African politician (relative or not) who, once in office, proceeded to round up teh gheys.

    Can anyone doubt that they would have called for Bush’s impeachment, for Bush to be infected with AIDS, or what have you – until and unless Bush forcefully condemned that African politician?

    If they would have done it to Bush (and they would have), they should be doing it to Obama as we speak. But I’ll bet they’re still too busy worrying about whether a 16-year old girl somewhere has said the word ‘fag’ and calling her mother to account for that.

  6. I’m tired of the whole “if this had been a Republican” line…that is just whiny, sour grapes and I don’t think it accomplishes much, true or not. I don’t need any more evidence that the mainstream media is biased and unfair and anyone who doesn’t see their bias by now is not going to be convinced, regardless of what you show them or tell them. So how about we stick to the important stuff and not stoop to the level of the people we loathe? If Obama campaigned for anyone who is vehemently anti-gay, then that should be the story and that’s what we should stick to…IMHO.

  11. 3: Ummmm….what does that have anything to do with it? I’m calling the writing on the fact that he’s created a headline out of a false statement and pointed out the how it’s similar to Bachman’s statement….see it on the internet and just repeat it over and over again in an attempt to make it the truth.

    So, instead of attacking me, why can’t you even provide reference to a source that can independently verify the claim made in the headline? I’m guessing you probably can’t, so you just follow up a false statement with a personal attack. How convenient.

  14. Funny how the outrage is over ‘it’s not really Obama’s cousin!’ instead of the actual statements/actions.

    Then again, it’s not like it’s Uganda… It’s not a good cudgle to beat Christians with.

  16. Funny how the outrage is over ‘it’s not really Obama’s cousin!’ instead of the actual statements/actions.

    Well also the fact that Raila is not Obama’s cousin and Obama also did not support Raila in the election, meaning Obama has absolutely nothing to do with this situation.

    Then again, it’s not like it’s Uganda… It’s not a good cudgle to beat Christians with.

    Well it could be like Uganda, if you had some evidence of the accusations made by this blog rather than just unsubstantiated accusations.

  20. #12 – “I’m calling the writing on the fact that he’s created a headline out of a false statement and pointed out the how it’s similar to Bachman’s statement.”

    Can YOU prove that it’s a false statement, Kevvie? The BBC has already deduced the veracity of the statement and for many people, that’s enough. If you have proof, Kevvie, then cite it; if not, I call bullshit.

    And why bring Bachmann into this? Did you get talking points from Matthews and Olbermann at PMSNBC? You are postulating again.

    “see it on the internet and just repeat it over and over again in an attempt to make it the truth.”

    You mean the way people prove things like climate change, Obama’s birthplace and “Bush lied, people died?” Try again, jackwagon.

    “So, instead of attacking me, why can’t you even provide reference to a source that can independently verify the claim made in the headline?”

    Ah! The old spin routine – trying to change the premise of the discussion by discrediting the attacker. The burden of proof is not on me, it is on YOU. I totally agree with the point of the blog, and I don’t need to refute it. You spin more often than Lynda Carter.

    “I’m guessing you probably can’t, so you just follow up a false statement with a personal attack. How convenient.”

    Not only convenient, but fun for the entire family! Your comments make for rich pickings, Kevvie old girl. 😉

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  21. Don’t expect any of the American Gay Leftist Lickspittles to protest this Obama family state-sponsored action.

    If’n Odinga were an American pol, the GayLeftBorg would proclaim him a champion of “gay rights” (whatever the hell that is) and shower him with cash and votes. And Doops there would scream “raaaacist” at anybody who dared question him.

  24. Raila Odinga also was purported to have signed an agreement to try to institute Sharia Law should he come to power.
    He later denied ever signing the document.
    Photos of his signature on it are still on line, however.
    And Odinga was NOT actually elected.
    He lost by a small amount.
    Then his supporters went crazy and many people were killed and maimed by them.
    After a few days of that the winner of the election agreed to ”share power” with Odinga for the sake of peace.
    Now look what its got them!
    Sharia is on its way further south in Africa than ever before.
    And that official winner?
    Odinga is calling on him to quit politics!

  25. So never mind that gays are being arrested somewhere just for being gay….I see the dems here think the argument is whether of not Ibie and odinga are cousins or if he actually did campaign…welk kids go to Youtube. plenty of footage over there just plug in …odinga/obama …this sob had his minions go rioting after he lost by over 200,000 votes. while they were on their rampage they locked Christians in a church and burnt it to the ground….what do you think they will do to those gays…..

  26. Gee, I guess that Obama has as much to do with Odinga as Dick Cheney and Scooter Libby had to do with the “outing” of Valerie Plame.

    Right, kevin? Dooms?

    Guys, y’all made up the rulebook we’re using: Attacks on Sitting Presidents, 2000 through 2008. If you don’t like the result, maybe you should’ve written different rules.