GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

So, mocking Barney while welcoming gay conservatives makes Breitbart anti-gay?

by

Over at Big Hollywood, my pal John Nolte makes sport of Media Matters’s “hysterical 2,300 word response to the announcement of Andrew [Breitbart]’s new association with GOProud”.  He takes issue with the left-of-center web-site for slurring that right-of-center new media pioneer as anti-gay.  You see Breitbart, as have the bloggers on the site, has often made fun of the eminently mockable and very unhappy ranking Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, a Mr. B. Frank.

Oh, that loquacious Democrats just happens to be gay, those who so mock, in the views of the politically correct guardians of the sacred narrative of victimology, must needs harbor anti-gay attitudes and manifest extreme intolerance to all those who differ from the white Anglo-Saxon male norm.  (Guess that means those who mock or insult the immediate past governor of Alaska must then be misogynistic since Mrs. Palin is a woman.)

Nolte will have none of that nonsense:

Could someone please explain to to those with the Indian name Abusers of 501(c)(3), the difference between criticizing grotesquely offensive behavior unbecoming of a congressman (a brothel was run out of Frank’s house by his former boyfriend) and anti-anything?

Regardless, I congratulate Andrew on his new appointment and look forward to meeting and partying with and welcoming to our Big Tent, all the GOProuders attending this year’s CPAC.

Another conservative welcoming gays into their confabs.   Kind of wrecks the narrative.  Doesn’t it?

For the record, while John may be prominent on the right, he and I have been friends almost since I started blogging, having linked each other when he was Stranded on Blue Islands, corresponded regularly and socialized frequently.  And despite this early association with a gay blogger, that fine man, married to an equally fine woman, has risen rapidly among the ranks of right-wing bloggers.

Comments

  3. >>the sacred narrative of victimology

    Had you not noticed this phrase pretty much sums up your post, in fact many of them. Oh, us poor oppressed homosexual conservatives! We can’t get no respect.

    You’re like the Rodney Dangerfields of American politics – oppressed by the mean old gay left and the 95% of the right who think you should be in reorientation camps with scarlet tattoos on your butts.

  4. *sigh*

    Would it be possible to find a rant from Granny Goodness filled with actual information?

    I understand celebrating the acceptance of conservatives is alien to her, but she really needs to move past the ‘Jews for Hitler’ mem she enjoys employing.

    Remember, it was the national socialists and communist socialists who imprisoned, exterminated and tried to ‘cure’ the gays against their will. You know, the philosoply that the left embraces.

    Flash fact: The democrats canvas with the socialist, not the Republicans.

  5. ….. the 95% of the right who think you should be in reorientation camps with scarlet tattoos on your butts.

    The Auntie of All Dogma has consulted one of Levi’s ever useful polls.

    Well, just for your information, The Auntie of All Dogma failed to mention that 212% of the left wants a pink ribbon tatooed on the foreheads of gays and demands the entire right be lobotomized.

    Also, The Auntie of All Dogma failed to mention that she intends to be the Queen of Hearts and rule over her minions with Dogmatic whim.

    Ain’t hyperbole for show just the best little game there is?

  6. and the 95% of the right who think you should be in reorientation camps with scarlet tattoos on your butts.

    Brought to you by the same folks who control speech, wish to disarm the public, push for thought crime legislation and keep minorities as slaves on their plantation.

  7. Miss Dogma, do appreciate the morning humor. Trying to figure out where in the post, I engage in any “victimology.” Could you please identify the precise passages and summarize its content so as to familiarize us with this apparent theme.

    If you had bothered to read the post in order to understand my point rather than to use it as a jumping off point for your talking points, you would see that i had fun writing this post, making fun of Media Matters, rather than lamenting their coverage of the event.

    At the same time, I wasn’t lamenting anyone, but praising my good friend John Nolte — and by implication the other conservatives, including Andrew Breitbart, who welcome gays.

    Had you not been looking for a theme, you might have discovered points entirely at odds with your prejudiced perspective.

    My, my, my, you do provide some pretty amusing entertainment around here while regularly making our point about left-wing bias. Thanks so much!!

  9. 95% Auntie? Really? Which orifice did you pull that number from?

    If it’s true (not bloody likely), then: Woo-hoo! I’m an exceptional 5%-er! In reality, it’s more likley that it’s 5% who wish for the ‘reorientation’ camp and 95% who are of the live-and-let-live camp. You see? I can pull stats out of my backside too. The difference is, my ‘stat’ doesn’t villify almost an entire segment of society, whereas yours does.