Alright, so it’s well-known (and almost excusable with today’s short-attention-span public) that sex sells. That explains why the at-first reluctant former mainstream media went wall-to-wall with coverage of soon-to-be (but not soon enough) former New York Congressman Anthony Weiner’s naughtiness. (Of course, their initial reluctance is no question due to the “D” he wears on the right side of his title.) That Weiner was one of the nastiest, most partisan, and rhetorically ugly members of the once-vaunted assembly was of no interest to the press. That his support for policies that have been an albatross around America’s neck also rose no brows. What they wanted were those pics (once Andrew Breitbart forced their hands with undeniable photographic evidence that they were never going to seek out themselves) and a salacious headline (one preferably that included a grade-school-era pun, if possible, please).
The next thing the press darlings love is a human-interest story. Forget the details of a crime. Forget any sort of ongoing work of the authorities to capture a criminal. Certainly forget any sort of racial description of an alleged perpetrator. But if something’s gone down in the big city, you can count on the locals (and if it’s dramatic enough, the Big Three) to cover the angle of the family that’s been affected or the children left orphaned.
So we were introduced over and over to the dutiful wife, Huma Abedin—currently with child. Naturally the angle of her working for the oft-humiliated wife of the former president and current Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, was played, often with a sly wink. Much was made about the likelihood of the two conferring over how to best deal with the situation, both in public and in private. In fact, it wasn’t until Mrs. Weiner returned from her overseas trip with the Secretary (on which she’d been when the whole escapade broke) that the Congressman finally decided to fold up his tent and go home. There was even the irony of Bill Clinton having officiated at their wedding. (Is he a rabbi now? Talk about a comeback!)
In all that, though; in all the delving into this couple’s details and discussing ad nauseam about what’s next for them… no interest from those stalwarts for the Public’s Right To Know about this little tidbit:
It turns out that Huma Abedin may have very close links to a little terrorist organization known as the Muslim Brotherhood.
Al-Liwa Al-Arabi (translated here) claims to have leaked an extensive list of members of the Brotherhood’s secret women’s division, which is known alternately as the Muslim Sisterhood or the International Women’s Organization (IWO). This detailed list was partially published by Al Jazeera and several other major Arab newspapers. And it included Huma’s mother, Saleha Abedin.
Apparently her brother is also closely tied with the Brotherhood.
A quick Google search for “Huma Weiner Muslim Brotherhood” brings up just a few hits related to this possible connection, most notably over at American Thinker and The Examiner. But funny that there’s no NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, or even FOX.
Now, it’s possible that none of this is actually legit. Perhaps over there ‘Abedin’ is like ‘Smith’. Perhaps she’s been cast away from the family herself and therefore there’s no real link here. Perhaps it’s all just a big misunderstanding. But of course we’d never get to the bottom of any of that if we relied only on the old-school press. Perhaps all these allegations are nothing, but they’re definitely interesting, don’t you think? Then again, perhaps Rep. Weiner was just being hacked by a prankster after all. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, folks.
With all their attention paid to Huma recently, why has nobody asked a few obvious questions?
Are these alleged links accurate?
Is there a woman with close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood working hip-to-hip with our Secretary of State?
Does this explain the Obama Administration’s hands-off policy toward Syria and its lackluster performance in the post-Mubarak Egypt which is being slowly but surely handed over to the Brotherhood?
I know, I know, those are boring policy questions. Who cares that someone so high up in our own State Department is (or may be) also so tightly entwined in a terrorist organization such as the Muslim Brotherhood? Snoozer, I realize.
But maybe it’d be more pop-culture-ready if Katie Couric or the gals from The View sat little Huma down and asked her how the members of her family who are affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood reacted when she told them she’d met a nice Jewish fella who just happens to be a member of the US Congress and was interested in marrying him. I’d imagine they were just as excited as when she told them that she’d be going to work for the then-First Lady. What a treat to have one of their own working in such highly-placed positions in the belly of the beast. Inshallah!
-Nick (ColoradoPatriot) from HQ