Gay Patriot Header Image

Guest Post: Obama to Farmers: We’re the ones you’ve been waiting for!

Posted by GayPatriotWest at 2:13 pm - July 5, 2011.
Filed under: Big Government Follies

Lost in last month’s Weinergate nonsense was Obama’s June 9th signing of Executive Order 13575, which bears eerily close resemblance to a United Nations program known as “Agenda 21.”

For those of you unfamiliar, Agenda 21 is a two-decade old, grand plan for global ’Sustainable Development,’ brought to you by the good people over at the UN. George H.W. Bush (thanks a bunch, George) and 177 world leaders agreed to it back in 1992, and in 1995, Bill Clinton signed Executive Order 12858, creating a Presidential Council on ‘Sustainable Development.’ This effectively injected the central planning virus into America’s large, churning government machine without the need for any review or discussion by Congress or the American people.

Now, “sustainable development,” on it’s face, sounds harmless enough, until you consider just what it is Agenda 21 purports to accomplish, given the UN’s long-held hostility to the idea of “private property:”

Land… cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interest of society as a whole.

Leaving aside the fact that international bon vivant and all-around good guy George Soros has dumped more than $2 million into enacting this travesty in the US, and as one who isn’t inclined to look for “black helicopters” in the sky, this really is a load of collectivist crap.

However, with a stroke of his mighty pen, Obama would seem to have not only gotten in the game, but is determined to show the rest of the world how weak their socialist-fu really is with Executive Order 13575, establishing the White House Rural Council (WHRC):

Section 1. Policy. Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead. These communities supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. Though rural communities face numerous challenges, they also present enormous economic potential. The Federal Government has an important role to play in order to expand access to the capital necessary for economic growth, promote innovation, improve access to health care and education, and expand outdoor recreational activities on public lands.

There’s that pesky “sustainable communities” idea again; the notion that we dimwitted, knuckle-dragging, capitalistic, always-voting-against-our-own-self-interest, right-wing troglodytes simply can’t be trusted to manage our own campsites (seriously, “outdoor recreational activities?”), let alone our farms without Valerie Jarrett’s guiding hand. Oh yes, but more on that in a moment.

Really, I don’t know why he doesn’t just say “Rural Stimulus Program” and get it over with. Oh, right…there’s an election to be won next fall.

But again, it would seem the president has only our best interests at heart:

Sec. 4. Mission and Function of the Council. The Council shall work across executive departments, agencies, and offices to coordinate development of policy recommendations to promote economic prosperity and quality of life in rural America, and shall coordinate my Administration’s engagement with rural communities.

make recommendations to the President, through the Director of the Domestic Policy Council and the Director of the National Economic Council, on streamlining and leveraging Federal investments in rural areas, where appropriate, to increase the impact of Federal dollars and create economic opportunities to improve the quality of life in rural America;
coordinate and increase the effectiveness of Federal engagement with rural stakeholders, including agricultural organizations, small businesses, education and training institutions, health-care providers, telecommunications services providers, research and land grant institutions, law enforcement, State, local, and tribal governments, and nongovernmental organizations regarding the needs of rural America.”

Virtually every aspect of rural life seems to now be part of the government’s mission. And while all of the items in (b) sound like typical government speak, you should be alarmed when you read the words “nongovernmental organizations” (NGOs). NGOs are unelected, but typically government-funded groups that act like embedded community organizers. You know, like ACORN, for example.

But perhaps the icing on this cake is just who is going to make up the WHRC. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack will logically chair the group, but just take a look at the all-star lineup Obama has picked to round out the team:

(1) the Department of the Treasury; Timothy Geithner

(2) the Department of Defense; Robert Gates

(3) the Department of Justice; Eric Holder

(4) the Department of the Interior; Ken Salazar

(5) the Department of Commerce; Gary Locke

(6) the Department of Labor; Hilda Solis

(7) the Department of Health and Human Services; Kathleen Sebelius

(8) the Department of Housing and Urban Development; Shaun Donovan

(9) the Department of Transportation; Ray LaHood

(10) the Department of Energy; Dr. Steven Chu

(11) the Department of Education; Arne Duncan

(12) the Department of Veterans Affairs; Eric Shinseki

(13) the Department of Homeland Security; Janet Napolitano

(14) the Environmental Protection Agency; Lisa Jackson

(15) the Federal Communications Commission; Michael Copps

(16) the Office of Management and Budget; Peter Orszag

(17) the Office of Science and Technology Policy; John Holdren

(18) the Office of National Drug Control Policy; R. Gil Kerlikowske

(19) the Council of Economic Advisers; Austan Goolsbee

(20) the Domestic Policy Council; Melody Barnes (former VP at Center for American Progress)

(21) the National Economic Council; Gene B. Sperling

(22) the Small Business Administration; Karen Mills

(23) the Council on Environmental Quality; Nancy Sutley

(24) the White House Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs; Valerie Jarrett

(25) the White House Office of Cabinet Affairs; and such other executive branch departments, agencies, and offices as the President or Secretary of Agriculture may, from time to time, designate.

Given Obama’s ideology and determination to “fundamentally transform America,” it isn’t surprising that just about every single department in the federal government will have something to say about the “quality of life” in America’s rural communities. However, you’ll notice that with Number 25, Obama has given himself and the SecAg the option to designate anyone he chooses to serve on this ludicrously powerful politburo, er…council.

You have to hand it to Obama. When he comes at you, he comes heavy.
=

Share

7 Comments

  1. “Section 1. Policy. Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead.”

    They can’t help themselves. The Democrats can’t even draft a “statement of policy” for legislation or an executive order that doesn’t incorporate an idiotic marketing slogan from the reelection campaign of the current administration. Governing = Campaigning, and vice versa. 100 years from now, a pundit or poli sci grad student will be doing research on the Obama Presidency and will come across this EO and think, “winning the future”? What the hell does that mean?” In legislation or an executive order, it just sounds like bad grammar or a pathetically inarticulate way to memorialize the Administration’s rationale for what it’s doing.

    It’s just more evidence of the Democrats’ contempt for the rule of law, the Constitution, the Separation of Powers doctrine, etc. Why go to the trouble of trying to ram something through Congress when Obama can just draft an order informing all of us (his dum-dum subjects) what he’s decided the law is going to be.

    If this loser gets reelected, then it’s true. We ARE his dum-dum subjects.

    Comment by Sean A — July 5, 2011 @ 2:45 pm - July 5, 2011

  2. As subtle as a train wreck, and about as right.

    Maybe defense is involved because we bitterly cling to our guns (and swords!) and religion?

    Comment by The_Livewire — July 5, 2011 @ 2:47 pm - July 5, 2011

  3. Again, though, think about who supports Obama: people like Levi, Counterfail, Cas, Auntie Dogma, and the like, none of whom want to work, none of whom want to do anything other than coast on their minority status, and none of whom have anything worth redistributing or confiscating.

    Private property rights are only meaningful to those who have private property. Obama voters do not – or if they do, i.e. Pelosi, they are used to ignoring the government and using it illegally. They are welfare addicts, dependent on the state to solve all of their problems or to keep them from having to spend a dime of their own money.

    I think the answer is very simple. Since the Pelosi-Obama Party and the UN oppose private property and private land ownership, theirs should be the first to be confiscated. Some smart Republican should simply raise a bill declaring UN headquarters to be public communal property and force them to open the doors to New York’s homeless population.

    Next, the White House.

    Watch how fast the Obama child and his puppets back off after that.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — July 5, 2011 @ 3:16 pm - July 5, 2011

  4. Obama is self-destructing by his own hand; this will backfire like everything else he touches.

    Comment by Sebastian Shaw — July 5, 2011 @ 3:48 pm - July 5, 2011

  5. Sebastian…how can it backfire when 80% of the American voters know nothing about the ruinous course of events orchestrated by Obama and his useful puppets? How many more people actually follow the Casey Anthony trial on a daily basis than know what’s really going on in this country? To quote Pogo…”we has met the enemy and they is us”.

    Comment by Mary — July 5, 2011 @ 4:15 pm - July 5, 2011

  6. To the majority of Bicoastal Obama supporters, “farmers” are greedy, petty moochers who live with a Bible in one hand and a shotgun on the other on those pretty little squares and circles the Obamaistas see out their jet’s windows.

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — July 5, 2011 @ 4:43 pm - July 5, 2011

  7. The Federal Government has an important role to play in order to expand access to the capital necessary for [blah blah blah]

    Last time the Feds “expanded access to capital”, we got the housing bubble.

    For the government to “expand access to capital” means, by definition (i.e., always and inevitably), that the government wants sub-prime loans to be made… loans to the undeserving… loans unlikely to be repaid.

    And Guess Who covers the cost? That’s right: you, the saver and taxpayer.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — July 7, 2011 @ 5:04 pm - July 7, 2011

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.