The uncontested primary of an unchallenged incumbent doesn’t mean much, but it can perhaps be taken as some kind of measure of intensity, partisan loyalty, or simple willingness to show up to and be counted.
And by those measures, George W. Bush handily defeated Barack Obama in New Hampshire last night.
Bush’s uncontested 2004 re-election bid received 53,962 votes in the state.
Obama has, with 94% in, received just under 47,000, and is on pace to pick up 49,983 in last night’s uncontested primary, if the pattern holds.
Republican turnout last night, meanwhile, broke records.
Hmmmm.
Hope & change, baby!
-Bruce (GayPatriot)
And W, as I recall, went on to lose the Granite State in the general election.
Analysis of this caliber makes me wonder if gaypatriot is a real conservative site or just a parody of one.
JJ-
The story came from BuzzFeed — a liberal news outlet.
Nice try.
And we have to remember that JJ is supporting Barack Obama, who is so delusional that he says Romney lost the New Hampshire vote.
And don’t forget how Barack Obama today shrieked that Tea Partiers shot Gabby Giffords.
After all, we all know who’s in charge of the Obama Party. Wasserman-Schultz is nothing more than a parrot repeating what Barack Obama tells her to say.
I really think Barack Obama has completely lost his grip on reality at this point.
What’s your point — that both sites are jokes? I’ll accept that. Meanwhile Dallas, true to form, exhibits his own delusion while accusing others of delusion. It’s always fun to follow his links to articles that don’t say what he claims they say.
#2 & 5
The presence of a facetious post suggests the whole blog is a joke? Are your comments parodies of liberal logic, or actual examples?
That is a meaningless stat.