Gay Patriot Header Image

“tone of homophobia” in Obama’s mockery of Mitt’s making use of word, “marvelous”, to marvel at magnificent Ryan’s budget?

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 6:03 pm - April 8, 2012.
Filed under: Blogress Divas,Misrepresenting the Right

So claims blogress diva Ann Althouse in her post on one of the Democrat’s many criticisms of Republicans for their Ryan budget:

Obama mocked Romney this way: “He said that he’s ‘very supportive’ of this new budget, and he even called it ‘marvelous’ — which is a word you don’t often hear when it comes to describing a budget.” Comic pause. “It’s a word you don’t often hear generally.”

. . . .

My first association, on hearing one man mock another for saying “marvelous,” was: Gay. It’s an I’m-more-manly move. I heard a smidgeon of homophobia. Perhaps I heard it because, a few days ago, on winning the Wisconsin primary, Romney introduced Ryan, saying: “Congressman Ryan, he’s a great leader, wonderful speaker, but he’s not gonna take Ann’s place.” (Ann being, of course, Mitt’s wife.) At the time, I quipped: “Combatting the ‘bromance’ rumors!”

. . . .

But Romney uttered “marvelous,” the adjective. He was talking about Paul Ryan’s budget, and Obama snickered. Am I wrong to hear a tone of homophobia? (more…)

CNN: Selectively Reporting Job Growth under George W. Bush

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 12:52 pm - April 8, 2012.
Filed under: Economy,Media Bias

Yesterday, while doing my cardio, I caught the “news” on CNN.  And once again, they spun the headlines to favor their friends in the White House.   Reporting the latest unemployment numbers showing tepid job growth, they helpfully furnished us with a chart similar to the one below comparing job growth under the incumbent to that under his predecessor.

Fortunately, when I did a google search for the chart, a blogger who linked it had the same reaction to the chart most of us did when first we saw it on our left-of-center friend’s Facebook pages*: “This chart provides us with only a year of the Bush Administration’s performance.

It is, he added, “a little unfair to Mr. Bush to snag the worst of his numbers and compare to the rosiest of the Obama numbers“, providing then a more complete picture of job growth over the past decade:

You’d think that if the purpose of a news agency were to compare two politicians, they’d give us this more complete picture rather than the selective chart at the top of this post. It does seem that media outlets like CNN want to define George W. Bush’s economic record by his last year in office rather than the full eight years — and without indicating that for his last two years in office, that Republican shared power with a Democratic Congress.

* (more…)