Gay Patriot Header Image

A somewhat sympathetic insight into Romney’s adolescent antics

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 2:35 pm - May 15, 2012.
Filed under: 2012 Presidential Election,Literature & Ideas

When I first came out, I read and enjoyed Edmund White’s early fiction Nocturnes for the King of Naples and Forgetting Elena.  His later work become increasingly sloppy and solipsistic; sometime in the 1990s, I stopped reading his stuff.  Of the gay writers writing today, White is perhaps the most gifted stylist — or at least was in his early work.

Last night, however, when Walter Olson linked an essay White had written, reflecting on his years at Cranbrook, the “boys’ prep school outside Detroit” that both he and Mitt Romney attended, though at different times, I discovered the writer I had once enjoyed. He reflected on his own years at the school, then considering the nature of the place and the background of the studies, turned his thoughts to the presumptive Republican presidential nominee and considered the recent allegations of the candidate’s adolescent antics:

On the one hand he had an embarrassingly famous father, the governor of Michigan, whom he idolized as the youngest child. On the other he was the sole Mormon, a member of what was definitely seen as a creepy, stigmatized cult in that world of bland Episcopalian Wasps (we had Episcopalian services at chapel three mornings a week). When his father was president of American Motors, he lived at home and was a day student, an envied status. When his father was elected governor and moved to the state capital of Lansing, he became a boarder. Suddenly he was surrounded by other Cranbrook students and the strict “masters,” 24/7. He no longer had the constant support of his tight-knit family. Now he had to win approval from the other boys.

No wonder he became a daring and even violent prankster. He who worried about his own marginal status couldn’t bear the presence of an unapologetic sissy like Lauber, with his long bleached hair (the Mormons, then as now, have insisted on a neat, traditional, conservative appearance, especially in their young missionary men whom they send out all over the world). In scorning and shearing a sissy student and leading a gang of five other boys in this “prank,” Romney may have felt popular and in the right for the first time.

Emphasis added.  So eager are some to demonize the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, that they fail to mention that Mormons are often marginalized; outside of Utah and other states in the interior West, they are often minorities in their community.

This marginalized minority status does not excuse what Mitt did (if indeed he did it), but does put his actions into perspective.  Were those in our legacy media less eager to attack the socially conservative LDS establishment, we might better appreciate the experiences of Mormon individuals.

At least one writer (who happens to be gay) took the trouble to put Mitt Romney’s adolescent pranks into context.  It is important for us to bear in mind that many who act out as he did in high school do so out of insecurity.  It does seem that his marriage to Ann helped center him and feel less of an outsider — and more anchored in his world.



  1. Problem with the quoted analysis is that it still assumes the Lauber story is true “as reported”. After learning of the Lauber family’s reaction, I don’t.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — May 15, 2012 @ 2:49 pm - May 15, 2012

  2. I haven’t seen anyone address the point that the 1960s was the dawn of the hippies, who often had long hair and sideburns. Was that the reason Romney pulled the “prank” he did at a school with a rigid dress code? And I’m not trying to downplay what happened, but cutting someone’s hair is something that will grow back as opposed to other “pranks” that result in permanent damage.

    Comment by Dottie Laird — May 15, 2012 @ 6:30 pm - May 15, 2012

  3. I have to believe that if this prank had been committed by a young Obama, the media would use it to show how “confused” and “hurting” he was in his youth, and how his troubled past helped to create the great man he is today.

    Comment by mnscorpio — May 15, 2012 @ 6:45 pm - May 15, 2012

  4. I have to admit I’m a bit chagrined by the attention this particular blog is paying to any story regarding Mitt Romney, given the MFM’s steadfast refusal to pay even the slightest attention to the SCOAMF’s past.

    If they insist upon giving a pass to the Lightbringer’s “youthful indiscretions,” then I would suggest we return the favor as it pertains to the presumptive Republican nominee.

    After all, teh iWon is already losing the Women’s War on Obama, so I see no need to play defense at this point.

    Comment by My Sharia Moor — May 15, 2012 @ 7:44 pm - May 15, 2012

  5. if this prank had been committed by a young Obama, the media would use it to show how “confused” and “hurting” he was in his youth, and how his troubled past helped to create the great man he is today.

    Bingo. After all, they already did that, re: the Lightworker’s alleged cocaine use.

    It’s simple. His politics agrees with the media’s; therefore, any wrong or corrupt thing he may have done in the past is automatically a sign of His greatness. Willard’s don’t, therefore, any wrong or corrupt thing he may have done in the past is automatically a sign of pure evil. No further questions asked.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — May 15, 2012 @ 7:54 pm - May 15, 2012

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.