In 2008, Harvard Law classmate, law review colleague remembered Obama as ‘a pretty cold fish’:
While details from President Barack Obama’s college years are scant, with the exception of a few acquaintances’ recollections, in 2008 one of his Harvard Law classmates offered a few seldom-heard remembrances of the president’s time at Harvard.
Conservative commentator Carol Platt Liebau, author of “Prude: How the Sex-Obsessed Culture Damages Girls (and America, Too!),” guest hosted Hugh Hewitt’s February 22, 2008 radio show and described her relationship with Obama during her law school years. Despite his liberal slant, she said Obama was respectful of the conservative perspective when he was president of the Harvard Law Review.
“I knew him reasonably well — as well as most people knew him, if not better — because quite in contrast to this image that Barack tries to project, as someone who is warm and all-embracing and all that kind of stuff,” Liebau said.
. . . .
“Quite in contrast to this all-embracing kind of ‘earth father’ image — this sort of messianic blaze of glory with which he’s deemed to envelope our television screens — he was a pretty cold fish,” she said.
Emphasis added.
You know, if they’re going to track down high school classmates who have critical things to see about the presumptive Republican nominee, why not locate law school classmates who have less-than-flattering things tgo say about the incumbent Democratic President of the United States.
And Ms. Liebau had even made her remarks in a public forum. But, then again, maybe the editors at the Washington Post aren’t paying much attention to what is being said in the new, more conservative, media.
“Cold fish” ….. that is a really r-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-c-i-s-t thing for anyone to say!
But she says he was a “pretty” cold fish. That is going w-a-a-a-a-y too far.
Does anyone have that White House number we are supposed to call when we pick up on a lie being told about The Won?
Question : Wonder how the Washington Post failed to track down this gal
Answer : That is easy. Women’s opinions and observations have no value to the press.
#2: “Answer : That is easy. Women’s opinions and observations have no value to the press.”
CORRECTION: [Conservative] women’s opinions and observations have no value to the press.