GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

America Deserves Better

by

This ad goes along with my view that America is tired of being exhausted all the time.  In 2008, Obama promised to be different.  Turns out he is WORSE – a corrupt Chicago politican.

YouTube Preview Image

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Comments

  3. #1 – Actually, Rich, we elected a Chicago thug, complete with forged records and questionable acquaintances.

    And we ended up with a guy who considers himself the HNIC.

    (Yes, I went there. If the Dems can call us names, they get it right back. Deal with it.)

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  6. Actually, maybe America DOESN’T deserve better. Sorry to say it, but the gimme-my-free-lunch looter and moocher crowd voted the bastard in. The progtards have been at this a LONG TIME (“Frankfurt School”), and we’ve been warned since the 50s about what was going on and DID NOTHING. I just hope it’s not too late.

  7. “Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.”
    ― Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

  8. I second Bastiat Fan in #6. Obama was elected fair and square (with no small amount of help from John McCain and GWB) and a population that believes that there is a free lunch.

  9. Why, Richard! Thank you for quoting my hero and greatest inspiration! Have you read much of his writings? The Law is an easy read…and don’t miss The Petition of the Candlestick Makers…the man communicated fairly complex ideas in simple ways—and with a sense of humor!

  12. Peter Hughes used the following acronym in an earlier comment nine hours ago that may be deleted/amended by the moderators:

    HNIC

    According to the Urban Dictionary, it stands for High N@gga In Charge.

    Only one person so much as blinked.

    Yes, Virginia, there are no racists in the Tea Party.

  13. Only one person so much as blinked.

    One person out of three. I have no idea what “High N@gga In Charge” is supposed to mean, but apparently the racism is in the use of the n-word. While I criticize Peter Hughes’ “use” of that word, I am much more concerned and abhorred with the systemic racism that progressives favour.

  14. Actually, it stands for “Head NEGRO in Charge,” and the last time I looked, that word was not banned by the PC Nazis.

    I used that word with the full intent to show you exactly how this CIC views himself and his minions. If you don’t believe me, just look at how his administration operates.

    I retract nothing, because I have nothing to apologize for.

    The truth hurts, doesn’t it, Snatchy.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  15. FYI – I repeat that I don’t have to apologize, but perhaps SnObama and his blind followers in the MSM and other statists (hello, Snatch) should apologize to America for its economic, fiscal and political descent into the abyss.

    And maybe they should apologize for all the bigoted, sexist and racist names they have called Palin, Bachmann, West, Rubio, Grenell et al.

    Who’s the bigot now, Snatch?

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  17. #16 – No problem and no offense taken, Richard. Sometimes my methods confound even my defenders.

    I learned my strategy from the Ann Coulter School of How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must).

    Sorry, couldn’t resist. 😉

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  18. The Ann Coulter school is one of courage. I remember quite well when she would visit those rats nests of neo marxism and hate at Columbia and NYU without batting an eye. More testosterone than many a man in that lady.

  19. Richard, the one thing I found out is that when a libtroll or nutroot hurls the “R” word at you (racist), then they’ve lost the argument.

    Most conservatives hate to be called racists, because when they respond in the negative, they are actually accepting the premise of their accusers. I don’t play that game.

    Instead, I focus on the reason WHY the Dhimmicrat uses the word – it’s because he can’t back up his arguments with facts or statistics.

    Calling me a racist basically means, in my opinion “I can’t argue with you, so you win.”

    This is why nobody dares to confront SnObama because of the “R” word. Even comedians don’t dare do this, because they are afraid of the repercussions.

    I say damn the torpedoes, and full speed ahead. I do not fall victim to the soft bigotry of lowered expectations from this administration. In other words, I treat this president as I would have treated any predecessor that acted a similar way. You know, sort of what Dr. King wanted us to do?

    Now, I’m going to sit back and watch the GayLeftLib borg go into full meltdown, like little Wicked Witches of the West.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  21. #20 – Really? A Google search? Is this the substance of the argument you are reduced to using, Snatch?

    And frankly, I don’t give a rat’s vagina what Mr. Freeman has to say to me. The next time I wish to hear what an uber-rich bigoted Hollywood actor believes I should do, it will be the sign of the Second Coming.

    Since you’re so into Googling (FYI, I prefer Bing), maybe you’d like to see the results of “Harry Reid pederast” today? Since it comes up so often, it must be true, right?

    Try again, bigot.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

    PS – Imitation is the most sincerest form of flattery. 😉

  22. Hi Peter,
    Yes, I am aware of the pederast rumors which Harry Reid hasn’t extinguished yet. Are you aware of the pederast rumor The_Livewire floated about me on Gay Patriot the other day? Great company you keep.

    HNIC has a long history. And, no, it didn’t start with Negro.

    Nice try.

    Regards,
    Cinesnatch

  23. “Mommy, he said a bad word!” – Up next from Cinesnatch.

    While I criticize Peter Hughes’ “use” of that word, I am much more concerned and abhorred with the systemic racism that progressives favour.

    Rattlesnake +1.

  25. perhaps SnObama and his blind followers in the MSM and other statists (hello, Snatch) should apologize to America for its economic, fiscal and political descent into the abyss

    Peter Hughes +1

    Sometimes my methods confound even my defenders.

    The problem is the battlefield smoke. We know that lefties are going to do their best to misunderstand us… why court the confusion actively? I have this same quibble with NDT and I do admit, it’s a fine line. There is going to be some smoke on the battlefield; how much is too much? It’s a personal judgment call.

  26. Snatchy acts as if I should feel ashamed of myself, or if his approval actually means anything to me.

    I couldn’t care less about either one.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  28. Peter,
    The shame you may or may not feel is up to you. And, it’s not about me or my approval. It’s about your callous choice of words in light of the Tea Party’s firm denial of harboring racists. You simply make the argument to the contrary.

    It sounds like you like the size of the shoe and you’re wearing it proudly.

    Godspeed.

    Regards,
    Cinesnatch

  30. Funny how Cinesnatch, despite his firm denial that Obama supporters are racists, refuses to condemn those who call for Clarence Thomas to be lynched or state that these individuals are racists.

    And since Cinesnatch is trying to scream that all Tea Partiers are racists because Peter said a bad word, then the video that Sean showed proves that Cinesnatch and all Obama supporters are racists who want to lynch black people they don’t like.

    The reason you have no credibility, Cinesnatch, is because everyone knows you are a manipulative, lying bigot who screams “racist” at everything and everyone in a desperate attempt to get your way. It doesn’t mean anything other than you trying to play a power trip, since you clearly respect outright racists like the Nation of Islam and the Black Panthers.

  31. Cinesnatch: with your shocking lack of the most basic human decency (and honesty) in the Breibart RIP thread, no remonstrations from you about anything, are ever credible.

  32. ILC: with your shocking lack of the most basic reading comprehension skills and desire to make everything about you, your obsession with the agenda of a person you’ve professed to not be interested in has grown beyond tired. The apology has been up for over a month now. It has even been amended to satisfy your pettiness, by including Bruce and Dan, despite having already apologized to them via personal email last Spring. I even mentioned it a few times after it was done. Your either willfully ignorant or obtuse. Whichever it is, I’m done. From a page out of your book, please take the advice of the last three words of your Post #11 addressed to me back in July.

  33. Written by Cinesnatch:

    I already have apologized to Breitbart’s widow.

    Written by ILC (acknowledging the quote):

    Your responsibility is to ACTUALLY APOLOGIZE TO BREITBART MOURNERS WHO WOULD COME ACROSS YOUR WORDS ON GAYPATRIOT.

    Added by Gay Patriot last month [before the aforementioned blockquotes]:

    [Added later at the commenter’s request:]

    To Susannah Bean and your four children,
    I am sorry for your loss and apologize for choosing the wrong venue to express my opinions. It was in extremely poor taste. My apologies also to Dan, Bruce, all GP commenters, and anyone else who comes across the Breitbart RIP thread.

  34. “HNIC” or “BNIC” is “OK” if a black guy uses it, but it is a “hate crime” if someone other than an enlightened, in-the-club liberal uses it. That is to say, David Letterman can use it.

    So, when it is used by someone other than the above named, it is necessary to stop everything and circle the wagons and spotlight the offender and vilify him. That way, the actual issue at hand is ignored, the name calling can commence and the topic is shifted.

    So, in response to this game, the best rebuttal is to sully the purity of the puritan who calls out the original “offender.” That is called mud wrestling.

    I take Peter H’s case in toto. Obama has built a wall of protection around himself which is nothing less than branding people who disagree with him as racists. He actually does not have to do it himself as he has all the black rent-a-mob professional race baiters to do it for him.

    Since he is automatically defended on the basis of his race, it would stand to reason and follow logically that he is the Big African-American In Charge.

    So, apparently, the issue is really over the nomenclature, not the concept. In this case, Vince insists that Peter H. is disingenuous when Peter H. says the “N” stands for “negro.” That, I am afraid is a draw.

    However, it is clear that Vince has not denied the concept that Obama has used the sensitive issue of racism as a shield not available to any previous President. That is likely because Vince can not deny that Obama is, in fact, operating not as the President of all the people but as the Big African-American in Charge in many instances.

  35. I notice that Snatch/Vince/Vagina/whatever (isn’t that where the term “snatch” comes from?) still hasn’t addressed why the NAACP refuses to condemn the blatantly racist ad about Rep. Allen West (R-FL) and instead tries to project his own racism onto me.

    I guess you could say he’s a one-note-statist.

    Hypocrisy, thy name is liberalism.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  37. when [HNIC] is used by someone other than [a designated liberal], it is necessary to stop everything and circle the wagons and spotlight the offender and vilify him. That way, the actual issue at hand is ignored, the name calling can commence and the topic is shifted.

    That’s why I question it. Yes, lefties are going to name-call and topic-shift regardless; but why send them an engraved invitation? Why invite confusion about who the good guys are? Then again, mud wrestling can be damn entertaining.

    As to #33: Good, “finally!”

  39. “Yes, lefties are going to name-call and topic-shift regardless; but why send them an engraved invitation?”

    Well, ILC, how better to counter their argument by exposing their hypocrisy and blatant lies?

    To quote my favorite coach: “The best defense is a good offense.”

    And I just love playing offense. 😉

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  40. Peter:

    I notice that Snatch … still hasn’t addressed why the NAACP refuses to condemn the blatantly racist ad about Rep. Allen West (R-FL) and instead tries to project his own racism onto me.

    We left off with you pretending “HNIC” is less racist than it appears. Last time I checked, I wasn’t a registered Democrat.

    Regards,
    Cinesnatch

  41. Snatch, I’ve already explained to you why I do not accept your premise. You have yet to explain why the NAACP – a supposedly non-partisan group, does not find the stereotype of the black man beating the white woman patently racist.

    And since they are non-partisan and you suggest that you are not a “registered” Democrat (more parsing of language here), then you are perfectly within your ability to explain the situation.

    I’ll be patiently waiting.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  43. So what? In your eyes, that would make me a racist, right? Big whoop. In my eyes, you’re an evil bigot towards gays.

    It doesn’t matter what this post says, as you’ll call it racist.

    It also proves that – since you can’t or won’t renounce the racism on your side of the aisle – you are just as complicit.

    Game, set, match. You lose. Try again.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  44. Peter,
    Your “explanation” was inadequate. “HNIC” has a long history and it didn’t start with “negro.” And, you have no qualms about using the term, regardless of the implications. Like it has been already said on this thread, the shoe fits, and you’re wearing it proudly. Feel free to “call” the “game, set, match,” but the truth remains. Funny how so many at GP feel the need to declare themselves “the winner.” Ironic, also. Feel free to have the last word. I’m done here.

    Regards,
    Cinesnatch

  46. May I politely suggest that we simply IGNORE trolls like Cinesnatch? He?/She?It? is clearly not interested in having an actual discussion, and like a non life-threatening inner-thigh rash is best simply ignored.

    Now go away cinetwat…in the immortal words of Glinda the Good Witch: You have no power here. Bye.