GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Comments

  3. As I commented before, a ‘favorite’ moment is 2:57 where the lady says, “I will support anything my President wants to do. Anything!”

    So… many… things… to point out wrong… with that… brain can’t… function.

  4. I expect our usual gang of idiots will protest that the people Schiff interviewed are not representative of Democrats as a whole.

    ” I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.” – some unimportant Democrat.

    I did hear a Democrat on talk radio opine that all incomes should be capped at $1 Million per year (“that’s enough for anybody”) and the Government should confiscate any income above that amount.

    Which means the Government would get exactly $0 in revenue under that scheme because no one is going to work hard enough to earn over a million if the Government’s going to seize all of it.

    Not all Democrats may be as opinionated as those Schiff interviewed, but the party’s hostility toward profits and people making money is well-demonstrated by their rhetoric.

  7. What you don’t see …

    The hours of unedited footage which he couldn’t cram into his narrative. Just by the intonation of some of their voices, you can tell that he had to pull back the severity of his question to get something out of his subjects.

    I’m sure I could have gone around the RNC and compiled a 5-minute video of Republican attendees who would have agreed to a non-sensical question like, “Would you support gays converting to straights if it meant lowering the federal deficit?” I think Kathryn Hepburn said it best in On Golden Pond, “Come here, Norman. Hurry up. The loons! The loons! They’re welcoming us back. ”

    In fact, now, I wish I would have flown to Tampa and did such a thing. Oh well. Que Sera, Sera.

  9. I’m sure I could have gone around the RNC and compiled a 5-minute video of Republican attendees who would have agreed to a non-sensical question like, “Would you support gays converting to straights if it meant lowering the federal deficit?”

    Then, why didn’t you? Show us the video.

  10. Just by the intonation of some of their voices, you can tell that he had to pull back the severity of his question

    Also known as “moving the goalposts.” Like this: “It doesn’t matter that Schiff got Democrat after Democrat to admit, on-camera and at their convention with no alcohol involved, that they really are against corporate profits! Because he didn’t get all 10,000 people! And he posed the question; it didn’t just spill out of all 10,000 of their mouths! And because they didn’t all agree to a ban; some only thought that corporate profits should be capped, or confiscated!”

  12. (continued) Thus, when the glass ought to be empty and it’s news that it has anything in it, spin it as half-empty. Schiff scores a goal (in terms of exposing who the Democrats really are), so move the goalposts to make it seem like he didn’t.

  13. 4. I expect our usual gang of idiots will protest that the people Schiff interviewed are not representative of Democrats as a whole.

    7. What you don’t see … The hours of unedited footage which he couldn’t cram into his narrative.

    The Democrat shills are so tediously predictable.

  17. I mean, let’s do a couple of thought-experiments.

    1) Suppose you had gone around the RNC and gotten delegates to agree to a proposition that their candidates would never admit to. Would you then add, “But I also had hours of video that were just nothing. So my video reveals nothing” – or other goalpost-shifting?

    2) Suppose Clinton had an (R) after his name. Would you still emphasize the alleged rape victim’s denial of her claim, over the facts that (1) she had told a consistent story of at the time of the alleged rape, and (2) she later recanted her denial, explaining that she had only ever given it from feeling personally terrorized?

    I think we all know the answer to those questions.