Gay Patriot Header Image

Democrats: Let’s Ban Profits!!!

Posted by Bruce Carroll at 11:10 am - September 6, 2012.
Filed under: 2012 Congressional Elections,2012 Presidential Election,American Self-Hatred,Arrogance of the Liberal Elites,Depression 2.0,DNC 2012 - Charlotte,Leftist Nutjobs,Liberalism Run Amok

More evidence from Charlotte that the Democrat Party has devolved into the American Marxist Party led by Chairman Barack.

YouTube Preview Image

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Share

28 Comments

  1. ILC – I saw this video via Twitter. Just saw now that you had posted it in the comments on earlier post!!

    Great minds think alike!

    Comment by GayPatriot — September 6, 2012 @ 11:14 am - September 6, 2012

  2. 🙂

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 6, 2012 @ 11:16 am - September 6, 2012

  3. As I commented before, a ‘favorite’ moment is 2:57 where the lady says, “I will support anything my President wants to do. Anything!”

    So… many… things… to point out wrong… with that… brain can’t… function.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 6, 2012 @ 11:19 am - September 6, 2012

  4. I expect our usual gang of idiots will protest that the people Schiff interviewed are not representative of Democrats as a whole.

    ” I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.” – some unimportant Democrat.

    I did hear a Democrat on talk radio opine that all incomes should be capped at $1 Million per year (“that’s enough for anybody”) and the Government should confiscate any income above that amount.

    Which means the Government would get exactly $0 in revenue under that scheme because no one is going to work hard enough to earn over a million if the Government’s going to seize all of it.

    Not all Democrats may be as opinionated as those Schiff interviewed, but the party’s hostility toward profits and people making money is well-demonstrated by their rhetoric.

    Comment by V the K — September 6, 2012 @ 11:30 am - September 6, 2012

  5. V, He didn’t say that!!!!1!!1! /sarc

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 6, 2012 @ 11:34 am - September 6, 2012

  6. That’s the kind of talk you would have found on the streets just before the 1933 Wiemar Republic elections. We know how well THAT turned out…

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — September 6, 2012 @ 11:38 am - September 6, 2012

  7. What you don’t see …

    The hours of unedited footage which he couldn’t cram into his narrative. Just by the intonation of some of their voices, you can tell that he had to pull back the severity of his question to get something out of his subjects.

    I’m sure I could have gone around the RNC and compiled a 5-minute video of Republican attendees who would have agreed to a non-sensical question like, “Would you support gays converting to straights if it meant lowering the federal deficit?” I think Kathryn Hepburn said it best in On Golden Pond, “Come here, Norman. Hurry up. The loons! The loons! They’re welcoming us back. ”

    In fact, now, I wish I would have flown to Tampa and did such a thing. Oh well. Que Sera, Sera.

    Comment by Cinesnatch — September 6, 2012 @ 12:00 pm - September 6, 2012

  8. Katharine, sorry.

    Comment by Cinesnatch — September 6, 2012 @ 12:00 pm - September 6, 2012

  9. I’m sure I could have gone around the RNC and compiled a 5-minute video of Republican attendees who would have agreed to a non-sensical question like, “Would you support gays converting to straights if it meant lowering the federal deficit?”

    Then, why didn’t you? Show us the video.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 6, 2012 @ 12:02 pm - September 6, 2012

  10. Just by the intonation of some of their voices, you can tell that he had to pull back the severity of his question

    Also known as “moving the goalposts.” Like this: “It doesn’t matter that Schiff got Democrat after Democrat to admit, on-camera and at their convention with no alcohol involved, that they really are against corporate profits! Because he didn’t get all 10,000 people! And he posed the question; it didn’t just spill out of all 10,000 of their mouths! And because they didn’t all agree to a ban; some only thought that corporate profits should be capped, or confiscated!”

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 6, 2012 @ 12:13 pm - September 6, 2012

  11. “Norman!”

    Comment by Cinesnatch — September 6, 2012 @ 12:15 pm - September 6, 2012

  12. (continued) Thus, when the glass ought to be empty and it’s news that it has anything in it, spin it as half-empty. Schiff scores a goal (in terms of exposing who the Democrats really are), so move the goalposts to make it seem like he didn’t.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 6, 2012 @ 12:18 pm - September 6, 2012

  13. 4. I expect our usual gang of idiots will protest that the people Schiff interviewed are not representative of Democrats as a whole.

    7. What you don’t see … The hours of unedited footage which he couldn’t cram into his narrative.

    The Democrat shills are so tediously predictable.

    Comment by V the K — September 6, 2012 @ 12:18 pm - September 6, 2012

  14. Yeah, pointing out the shortcomings of both sides and holding one’s nose at the voting booth makes one a shill.

    By that logic, attending a football game puts one on the road to conservatism.

    Comment by Cinesnatch — September 6, 2012 @ 12:25 pm - September 6, 2012

  15. Hard to hold your nose when both hands are occupied on the keyboard, typing out vigorous defenses of one side and slamming everything about the other.

    Comment by V the K — September 6, 2012 @ 12:28 pm - September 6, 2012

  16. Actually Cinesnatch, rising to defend an accused rapist when there is a (D) after his name, among other things, makes one a Democrat shill.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 6, 2012 @ 12:28 pm - September 6, 2012

  17. I mean, let’s do a couple of thought-experiments.

    1) Suppose you had gone around the RNC and gotten delegates to agree to a proposition that their candidates would never admit to. Would you then add, “But I also had hours of video that were just nothing. So my video reveals nothing” – or other goalpost-shifting?

    2) Suppose Clinton had an (R) after his name. Would you still emphasize the alleged rape victim’s denial of her claim, over the facts that (1) she had told a consistent story of at the time of the alleged rape, and (2) she later recanted her denial, explaining that she had only ever given it from feeling personally terrorized?

    I think we all know the answer to those questions.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 6, 2012 @ 12:41 pm - September 6, 2012

  18. VTK >>
    Touché.

    On another note, one of the major actors from you favorite show tweeted today. Just wanted to give you the head’s up, in case you hadn’t caught it.

    Comment by Cinesnatch — September 6, 2012 @ 12:44 pm - September 6, 2012

  19. DNC Delegate: “I would like to kill Mitt Romney.”

    No prompting from the interviewer.

    No hesitation from the delegate about saying this on camera.

    Comment by V the K — September 6, 2012 @ 1:02 pm - September 6, 2012

  20. You mean that sweet old grandma speaking broken English? Isn’t she a performance artist?

    Comment by Cinesnatch — September 6, 2012 @ 1:06 pm - September 6, 2012

  21. On-camera death threats, yes how “sweet”. Anybody who would do that, if they’re expressing a pro-Democrat view, is obviously “sweet”.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 6, 2012 @ 1:15 pm - September 6, 2012

  22. It’s so sweet when old people talk about murdering their political opponents.

    Comment by V the K — September 6, 2012 @ 1:33 pm - September 6, 2012

  23. Chairman of Palm Beach County Democrats: “Christians want Jews to die. “

    Comment by V the K — September 6, 2012 @ 1:41 pm - September 6, 2012

  24. It’s better, I think, when Democrats just call for banning profits.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 6, 2012 @ 1:42 pm - September 6, 2012

  25. I think i’m going to throw up after watching this….

    Comment by Leslie — September 6, 2012 @ 3:08 pm - September 6, 2012

  26. The stupid here, it burns! Without corporate profits, these idiots wouldn’t be able to get all their free stuff from Obama’s stash. Morons.

    Comment by runningrn — September 6, 2012 @ 3:42 pm - September 6, 2012

  27. I’m so glad I’m not a Democrat anymore. (Was, for almost a couple decades there.)

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 6, 2012 @ 4:06 pm - September 6, 2012

  28. […] via Gay Patriot […]

    Pingback by #DNC2012 convention goers: Banning profits is a Good Thing! « Public Secrets — September 6, 2012 @ 6:42 pm - September 6, 2012

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.