Like many fans of General David Petraeus, I was shocked yesterday by the news of his resignation. He has demonstrated, in service of our country, the kind of leadership we need in all walks of life.
Over at Commentary, Max Boot sums up the general’s accomplishments, saying the general deserves our thanks, not our obloquy.
Boot’s colleague Jonathan S. Tobin wonders if Petraeus’s resignation will get the media interested in Benghazi, finding their fascination with the story most revealing, particularly given their apparent disinterest in questions about the administration’s reaction to the attack on the American consulate in that Libyan city:
But the avalanche of press coverage that Petraeus attracted in the hours after his announcement ought to bring into focus a far more important story that most of the same media has ignored: the Benghazi fiasco. It speaks volumes about the current state of contemporary American journalism that a sex scandal generated far more interest from broadcast networks and the press than the questions of whether the administration failed to aid Americans besieged in Libya or why the government stuck to a bogus story about a video instead of admitting that terrorists were responsible.
Read the whole thing. A number of people are wondering if there is more to the story than a leader’s indiscretions. Another Commentary blogger wonders “who had the dirt on Petraeus?”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.