her desperate argument was that I was wrong because no one was defending me — while she was simultaneously screaming and shrieking at ILC for defending me.

Yeah… I’ve been sitting back in ‘popcorn’ mode, but I gotta say, that is the truth and the way you pointed it out NDT has given me a chuckle

It’s amusing because you’ve not “shown”, repeatedly or otherwise, anywhere on this thread, any type of argument about how tax increases on the wealthy won’t raise the desired revenue.

Comment by JennOfArk — November 12, 2012 @ 9:40 pm – November 12, 2012

Actually, I have.

Insane and unhinged, and quite the liar you are. But of course, we can expect no better from an Obama welfare slut.

what part of the kennel do you share with Cass? You certainly obfuscate identically, perhaps it is the dogwood.

First, there is no reason to think that tax increases on the wealthy are capable of raising the desired revenue, as NDT has shown repeated.

It’s amusing because you’ve not “shown”, repeatedly or otherwise, anywhere on this thread, any type of argument about how tax increases on the wealthy won’t raise the desired revenue. I’m not saying they will or won’t; I’m just pointing out that the only example you can give of anyone backing up any of your “arguments” is an example of someone backing up an argument you haven’t made in this thread. Maybe you’ve made it in the past, though I’ve no faith that it’s any better than any of the imbecilic drivel you’ve posted on THIS thread, but you haven’t made it here; you’ve not even ATTEMPTED to make it here, and yet…that’s the only example you can show of someone agreeing with anything you’ve ever said.

Of course, no one should be expected to comb through previous threads to look at the stupid things you’ve said there, so you’ll understand why I didn’t accept this as an example of anyone having your back on any of the stupid things you’ve said here today. And in point of fact, we’ve yet to see anyone agree with you that a) 30 cents represents over 300% of 9 cents; b) starving all the consumers isn’t a great way to get an economy moving, or c) anything else you’ve claimed.

So even your examples of “AHA! did so!” are as lame as the puerile “arguments” you’ve managed to drag out of your backside for this thread.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to go to the grocery store, where I’ll pile my cart high with T-bones and malt liquor, and use the food stamps I didn’t trade for drugs to pay for it all – with the tax dollars you paid from your meager wages at Taco Bell. Ta-ta!

I merely made the unassailable observation that giving tax cuts to rich people doesn’t “create jobs.” It never has, and it never will.

Comment by JennOfArk — November 12, 2012 @ 2:00 pm – November 12, 2012

But as we have already seen, she’s an unhinged liar who doesn’t know WHAT she says anyway.

Bottom line, this idea that “tax cuts create jobs” is just a fairy tale. In extreme cases there might be a bit of truth to it, but we aren’t talking about extremes in terms of cutting or raising rates. And any economic theory that relies on ignoring the rules that overarch all – those of supply and demand – in order to make any sense, are at root nonsensical theories.

There’s this thing called context, which I don’t expect you to understand any better than you understand math, but basically the meaning of context is that you don’t just take one word or sentence in isolation when deciphering meaning. My context, as anyone proficient in reading and understanding the English language would have no trouble grasping, was that nibbling around the edges on the tax code with a few lousy percent, as is the current case, doesn’t produce earth-shattering changes. IT NEVER HAS, AND IT NEVER WILL. Saying so does not, under the rules of context, NEGATE what I said originally, that maybe in EXTREME cases you might see some stimulative or depressive effects.

I’m sure that this is all lost on you, given that you simply aren’t that bright, and even in those cases where you are bright enough to grasp what’s been said, you aren’t HONEST enough to acknowledge it.

Now tell me again how I’m an “ignorant slut” who doesn’t know math because you have a shameful lack of grasp on the meaning of language. Then show us how 30 cents isn’t over 300% of 9 cents, and tell us how that effeminiate, faggy Nate Silver is just doing fag-math and Romney is going to win in a landslide. In other words, keep f***ing that chicken.

BTW, I can’t help but notice that no one here ever tries to step up to the plate to defend NDT’s pathetic attempts at argument.

Comment by JennOfArk — November 12, 2012 @ 8:08 pm – November 12, 2012

And then she shrieks and tries to deny that anyone ever has:

Since you link to a comment that isn’t anyone defending any of your extremely stupid pronouncements, NDT, it would appear that it’s you who possesses the reading disability.

Comment by JennOfArk — November 12, 2012 @ 8:20 pm – November 12, 2012

But of course, what was she previously screaming at ILC about?

ILoveCapitalism – NDT has shown nothing repeatedly, other than a shocking ignorance.

So her desperate argument was that I was wrong because no one was defending me — while she was simultaneously screaming and shrieking at ILC for defending me.

Ignorant and unhinged. Nothing more than a typical Obama Nazi, shrieking “SIEG HEIL, OBAMA!” at the top of her lungs, unable to tell the truth about anything or recognize any of the reality of her glorious Reich.

I merely made the unassailable observation that giving tax cuts to rich people doesn’t “create jobs.” It never has, and it never will.

Comment by JennOfArk — November 12, 2012 @ 2:00 pm – November 12, 2012

It’s not our fault you aren’t intelligent enough to make a coherent argument. That explains a lot about why you need a welfare check, though; no private company would hire such a lazy, pathetic, imbecile such as yourself, who can’t even keep track of her own words and lies about what she says.

Or maybe your psychic abilities just suck.

Comment by JennOfArk — November 12, 2012 @ 8:20 pm – November 12, 2012

Wrong again, liar slut.

First, there is no reason to think that tax increases on the wealthy are capable of raising the desired revenue, as NDT has shown repeated.

Ignorant and stupid liar. No wonder you can’t hold a job. Basic reading and research are quite beyond you. Is that why you scream and cry and piss yourself demanding a welfare check for doing nothing?

Yes, NDT, my “math” is so bad that all your compatriots are rushing in to correct it – NOT. Either 30 cents is worth over 300% of 9 cents or it’s not. Get out your calculator, bright boy, and tell us the correct answer on that.

Comment by JennOfArk — November 12, 2012 @ 8:18 pm – November 12, 2012

And now the imbecile tries to scream and cry and backpedal away from what she said in the first place.

Your math is wrong period, ignorant slut, because remember what you stated before?

I merely made the unassailable observation that giving tax cuts to rich people doesn’t “create jobs.” It never has, and it never will.

Comment by JennOfArk — November 12, 2012 @ 2:00 pm – November 12, 2012

See? Your “unassailable” assertion of “never”.

Therefore, all your attempts at math are lies by your own logic and statement.

So there’s no need. You’ve beclowned yourself by trying to argue that tax cuts have positive economic value when you stated unequivocally and “unassailably” that they NEVER did.

Again, ignorant imbecile, your arguments don’t make sense unless one has to realize that all you are doing is trying to rationalize why you should profit off the labor of others and why you should get paid for not working.

We all realize that. So we just sit here and watch and laugh as you throw screaming tantrum after screaming tantrum, demonstrating once again why your friend Levi thinks all liberal women are ignorant morons who can’t resist emotional manipulation by men.

Jenn gets upset that she’s hoist by her own ‘standards’ then tries to change the subject.

Her self beclowning continues.

The Live_Wire – you’d be the expert on beclowning, for comparing the phrase “it’s rich to see you calling someone else a moron” to multiple – too many to count – flinging-abouts of “slut” and various other charming epithets which stand in for actual facts or logic in NDT’s many posts. Only a clown would see equivalency there.

Translation: “How dare you hold me accountable to my own standards! My name is Leni Riefenstahl, and everything I do is to advance the Fuhrer Obama and his economic genius!”

BTW, I can’t help but notice that no one here ever tries to step up to the plate to defend NDT’s pathetic attempts at argument. Notably, no one has agreed that the key to economic prosperity is to kill off all the consumers. And other examples of happy lunacy, though that one tops all.

Comment by JennOfArk — November 12, 2012 @ 8:08 pm – November 12, 2012

Too bad you have a reading disability, moron.

Also, I find it amusing that you equate being right with everyone agreeing with you. It shows why your arguments lack actual facts, logic, and intelligence, and instead are just repeating talking points handed to you by the Obama Party.

It’s not an issue of “expenses” vs anything; it’s an issue of the marginal value of a dollar earned to the person who earned it.

Comment by JennOfArk — November 12, 2012 @ 7:24 pm – November 12, 2012

More attempted magic words spewing from the mouth of the imbecilic child who is whining and crying and screaming about why we won’t pay her for doing nothing.

The game is up, imbecile girl. Your lies have been debunked using your worst enemy — math. You are completely and totally broke.

Furthermore, you and your Barack Obama have been “stimulating” the http://www.gaypatriot.net/?comments_popup=56118#comment-720694economy with trillions upon TRILLIONS of debt for the past three years, yet have managed to do nothing but balloon the unemployment rate, collapse tax revenue, crash the GDP, and lower the country’s credit rating.

Why? Simple. You and your Barack Obama channel money to drunks, adult babies, and corrupt Congresspersons and call it “investment”, while shrieking “you didn’t build that, we’re going to confiscate it and give it to drunks, adult babies, and corrupt Congresspersons” at every successful business in sight.

That’s what makes your attempt to use magic words so hilarious. For all your whining and spouting about “demand”, all you’ve demonstrated is that you support and endorse policies that are dead opposite to allowing anyone to accumulate enough wealth to even drive demand in the first place.