Because, as I pointed out, you’re a deranged cultist who has no grip on reality when it comes to the statements of your god Obama.

You’re just like Levi. Facts, logic, and rationality don’t matter; all you know is “Obama good, Republican bad”.

Actually, Dallas, for the record, I didn’t denounce Right-to-Work laws.

Comment by Mike R — November 14, 2012 @ 11:47 am – November 14, 2012

Lie. Your post had no purpose other than to bash right-to-work laws.

I pointed out that Ayn Rand did.

Of course. You tried the Alinsky tactic of attempting to make people live up to their own book of rules as a means of bashing right-to-work laws.

Unfortunately for you, your dependence on Obama Party talking points and inability to think or research for yourself leaves you vulnerable to an informed person pointing out your OWN hypocrisy, given how your Obama Party opposes voluntary employer-employee agreements, demands that people be involuntarily required to pay union bosses and the Obama Party to even have a job, and then channels said forced contributions into the Obama Party’s funding.

The hilarious thing is that you actually thought quoting Ayn Rand might make a difference. This is because you are an Obama drone who isn’t mentally capable of thinking that you might agree with people on some things and not on others. Your Obama Party ideology requires absolute agreement with Obama on everything, and if you don’t, you are denounced as an ignorant racist.

All you demonstrate, Mike R, is that you are stupid and easily susceptible to bad propaganda. This is no doubt why you vote for Obama and worship Obama as your god.

For the record, though, I oppose both sort of laws — but the kind you brought up were not mentioned in the original post

Right to work laws forbid employees and employers from entering into voluntary contracts.

Comment by Mike R. — November 12, 2012 @ 10:34 pm – November 12, 2012

So according to Mike R, anything that prevents an employer from entering into whatever contract they like with an employer is a violation of rights and should be abhorred.

Perhaps Mike R ought to learn about the Norris-LaGuardia Act, which explicitly bans agreements between employees and employers that the employee will NOT join a union and pay dues as a condition of employment.

By the way, Ayn Rand opposed THAT, too.

Now, if Mike R were being consistent, he would denounce both as being violations of workers’ rights and demand that Norris-LaGuardia be repealed. But of course, he’s not; what he’s objecting to are the provisions of right-to-work laws that make it impossible (technically, unenforceable under law) for unions to demand that people make regular payments to union bosses and the Obama Party in order for them to keep their jobs.

Why? Because when workers aren’t compelled to join a union and pay dues, they don’t, and the Obama Party would go bankrupt without these compelled contributions.

That’s really it. Mike R and his fellow Obama puppets don’t care about workers or their rights; what they care about are keeping those forced dues coming into the Obama Party’s coffers.

How is a Union board “representing” it’s members’ interests any different than a corporate Board representing it’s shareholders’ interests? If you object to the financial distortion to the political process, …Ban Them Both from Participating.
.

Just about any major labor concern when it comes to unfair practices can be addressed throug the EEOC.

There is a large Toyota plant not far from where I grew up and a lot of my friends and neighbors work there.

I think there was a place for unions, but the more I see unions in the modern era they appear to be nothing more than thugs who extort money from members to support the democrats.