Gay Patriot Header Image

Sex Scandal Smokescreen?

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 10:10 pm - November 13, 2012.
Filed under: Media Bias,Obama Incompetence,Random Thoughts

Just caught this on Instapundit:

DONALD SENSING: Petraeus and Broadwell: The FBI circles the wagons. “There is nothing here deserving of the media attention it is getting (which should be redirected now directly upon the FBI itself, not the principals) or deserving of the expenditure of investigator man hours and resources being expended on it. Does one smell the aroma of a US attorney general ordering the FBI to make sure that this non-issue stays the lead story as Congress prepares to hear testimony about the Benghazi attacks?

Emphasis added.  Given that our friends in the legacy media seem to prefer the tawdry details of  sex scandal to the real story of the Obama administration’s incompetence, it is a reasonable question, no?

UPDATE:  Also via Glenn, Monica Crowley asks the questions that our friends in the legacy media should be asking.  And they ain’t about sex.

Share

58 Comments

  1. Sometimes, I think the sociopathic cultist’s presence here is a subconscious cry for help.

    Comment by V the K — November 14, 2012 @ 9:40 pm - November 14, 2012

  2. Oh, this was TOO hilarious.

    There’s nothing that needs to be set straight. You guys are crapping your pants, Tea Party style, and demanding attention and to be taken seriously.

    What we see here is the deluded and sick Levi continuing to melt down. As we know, Levi is completely unhinged and divorced from reality; he was humiliated in this thread in which every single one of the lies he’s tried to spin for Obama about Benghazi was debunked, with facts, references, and direct quotes from Obama himself.

    So what is the poor insane child to do? He can’t blame Obama. He can’t hold Obama accountable. So in order to make Obama look good, he projects all of Obama’s proven crimes onto Bush, screaming and crying that Obama is blameless, that everything, everything, EVERYTHING is Bush’s fault.

    And we refuse to let him do it.

    Hence, he screams and cries and wets himself even more, because that’s how he broke his worthless and incompetent parents. Notice how his rant is nothing more than “BUSH BAD! BUSH BAD! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHHHHHHHHH!” There is no fact, no research, no link, no real logic anywhere in his post; it’s the tantrum of a frustrated and emotionally-helpless toddler who is trying to scream his way into getting what he wants.

    And we will keep poking him and laughing at him. We can melt the little imbecile’s brain into powder. We can humiliate anyone and anything that dares speak up in the name of Obama or “progressivism” simply by citing him and his rants. We can tire him out until he realizes he’s losing and runs away and sulks, refusing to answer.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — November 14, 2012 @ 9:46 pm - November 14, 2012

  3. Sometimes, I think the sociopathic cultist’s presence here is a subconscious cry for help.

    Comment by V the K — November 14, 2012 @ 9:40 pm – November 14, 2012

    Meh, I think it’s more about envy and hatred for those who clearly have what he does not – respect, intelligence, moral values, money and – what all of those give – the capability to think and live independently.

    Levi has none of those. Levi can’t exist without the Obama Party and government. And if Levi were to do anything other than what the Obama Party orders him to do, he knows he would have nothing.

    Hard-core slaves resented freemen. In the same way, Obama Party slaves like Levi resent those who are free.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — November 14, 2012 @ 9:51 pm - November 14, 2012

  4. Of course….

    No one can explain why this you tube video led to riots, but the ‘killing bin laden’ video didn’t.

    Now hush Levi, the adults are talking.

    Comment by The_Livewire — November 15, 2012 @ 7:52 am - November 15, 2012

  5. It appears as if this thread has devolved into 3 or 4 people ganging up on ‘Levi”. Could someone please clarify for me what exactly they think happened in Benghazi? Or is it just an open ended demand for more information to try and hold Obama’s feet to the fire, actual crisis or not.

    And briefly,

    “No one can explain why this you tube video led to riots, but the ‘killing bin laden’ video didn’t.”

    This is a silly thing to say. This culture kills people for making cartoons. Not to mention most Muslims are peace loving people who didn’t like what Bin Laden stood for or did to the U.S. on 9/11. I spent some time in the Middle East, you cannot try and apply Western reason or logic to these people.

    Comment by Aaron — November 15, 2012 @ 5:44 pm - November 15, 2012

  6. Aaron,

    I can’t tell you what “exactly” I think happened at Benghazi, because we have multiple holes covered by stupid stuff.

    Ambassador Stevens was in a mission with security he did not trust and emailed about several times. After meeting with the envoy from Turkey he walked him to the gate and returned to the compound. Shortly thereafter, all Hell broke loose with mortar fire, machine guns and more. He was sealed off and the attackers broke in and spread diesel fuel and set the place on fire. His hired guards broke out to get help and he was lost in the smoke and confusion.

    A drone was filming overhead within a short time of the attack. One mile away CIA people wanted to go help and were told to stand down. Two disobeyed orders and reached the compound and did help. One painted the mortar nest with a laser expecting ariel gunships to take it out and exposed his own location in the process. Panetta knew about and was watching the drone views within an hour and within two hours he had a meeting with Obama.

    No help was sent on land or by air.

    Stevens body was delivered to a hospital by Libyans. There is much to be learned about that.

    The bodies were returned to the US and both Obama and Hillary went out of their ways in receiving the bodies to say that the men were killed in reaction to a You Tube film. They left room for no other possibility.

    There is a great deal more to fold into this narrative, but that is the skeleton. Now the Obama White House and Obamanauts are busy denying the facts and deflecting.

    This is exactly the same as Watergate. What did the players know and when did they learn it.

    As to the last part of you comment —- If a You Tube video upset the masses and caused this attack on the Benghazi mission —–

    Why would the high five film on killing Bin Laden be taken passively by the radical Islamists who were crying “we are all bin Ladens” at the 9/11 riots?

    Are you suggesting one was insulting and the other was not? If so, on what basis and evidence?

    Comment by heliotrope — November 15, 2012 @ 9:30 pm - November 15, 2012

  7. Crickets ………….

    Comment by heliotrope — November 16, 2012 @ 10:59 am - November 16, 2012

  8. Crickets………

    Comment by heliotrope — November 16, 2012 @ 8:41 pm - November 16, 2012

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.