If you stick to the argument at hand, I will respond accordingly.

Comment by Vince Smetana — December 18, 2012 @ 11:24 pm – December 18, 2012

Doubtful.

By ND30′s logic, if someone is attacked on the street by a hooded person, they can’t defend themselves unless they fight every hooded person in the world attacking others.

Comment by Vince Smetana — December 18, 2012 @ 11:13 pm – December 18, 2012

Pretty much, especially when you use the hood as your excuse for attacking them.

LOL.

Piety dance twice denied.

More anonymous disparagement of someone’s character from ND30.

Comment by Vince Smetana — December 18, 2012 @ 10:24 pm – December 18, 2012

Mm, yes, and “Levi”, “mike”, “Little Kiwi”, and “Passing By”, are common names, easily identifiable, directly linked to a specific person, identity fully disclosed.

LOL.

Because your concern is not dialogue; it is browbeating and attacking other people.

What unravels your game is our knowledge that you yourself are a stinking hypocrite who will never hold himself to any of the standards that he demands others hold themselves.

Hence, you are exposed as little more than a manipulator and a wannabe abuser whose game is to exploit the decency, fairness, and honesty of others for your own personal advancement.

A con’s game only works for as long as people don’t recognize him as a con. And you have been recognized as a con. With that knowledge, your demands now are visible transparently obvious attempts to manipulate others into performing piety dances, rather than any real or objective concern for rationality and decency, and thus peg you nicely as a typical “progressive” whose only concern is getting whatever he wants with no regard for anyone else.