Should the Senate immigration bill (or something similar) pass the House and be signed into law by President Obama, Marco Rubio’s political career will likely end with the 2016 elections. Conservatives in the party will be upset and will likely put up a candidate to oppose him the 2016 GOP primary (for the charismatic incumbent’s U.S. Senate seat).
Should Congress fail to pass comprehensive immigration reform, by the time the 2016 elections roll around, most people will have forgotten the past few months of negotiations and debate (on this issue) and will remember Senator Rubio for his conservative record and his Reaganesque manner of speaking.
My sense (and this is just a sense) is that Rubio is banking on the House to hold the line and not pass an immigration bill as sweeping as that he championed in the Senate. (Watch him in the coming weeks; if he puts pressure on the House to move, then it will show that there is little substance to this sense.)
He championed this issue not so much because he wanted to see the Schumer bill pass, but to break ranks, on a major issue, with the conservatives who have embraced him He wanted to present an image of a politician willing to work in a bipartisan manner, one who does not march in lockstep with his party.
And the man whom the Democrats and their allies in the mainstream media recently (ridiculously) derided for drinking water has now earned respect in their circles. Oh, they’ll pull out the knives again as soon as the Floridian points out flaws in Obamcare or challegnes the administration on its foreign policy (or lack thereof).
But, for now these purveyors of public opinion see him as a principled reformer willing to buck his party.
And Marco, bear in mind, what happened to the media’s favorite Republican when he secured his party’s presidential nomination back in 2008.
Maybe I’m saying all this because I have long respected the junior Senator from the Sunshine State — and believe we need more Republicans like him, individuals able to make the case for conservative policies who, like Ronald Reagan, appeals to those not used to hearing that rationale.
Please, do note that I include this post in the “Random Thoughts” category.
SOMEWHAT RELATED: Why I still love Marco Rubio