Gay Patriot Header Image

The primary evidence of conservative racial prejudice. . .

. . . is liberal prejudice, their assumption that opposition to the president and his policies is based on race. And this assumption grows out of ignorance, a basic unfamiliarity with Republican ideas and conservative arguments.

Share

20 Comments

  1. It’s called “Projection”.

    Comment by Juan — August 27, 2013 @ 6:03 pm - August 27, 2013

  2. Is most opposition to Obama based on race? – Of course not
    Is some? – Of course
    The “some” needs to be stamped out by right thinking conservatives.

    So when people show up to political campaigns with monkeys on a noose, or use racially loaded phrases like “shucking & jiving” conservatives should quickly stand up against it and say “stop.”
    This would more easily blunt this particular critique of the conservatives.

    Comment by mike — August 27, 2013 @ 10:56 pm - August 27, 2013

  3. Sorry, mike, but we know full well that lying, malicious bigots like yourself smear and attack conservatives without any evidence whatsoever.

    So since you’ve already demonstrated that you’re a liar and will say anything without evidence to smear conservatives, your screaming and ranting about what conservatives allegedly have done is nothing more than repeated malicious lies on your part.

    It really shows the lack of morals on the part of Obama supporters that you use such malicious lies and make such claims that conservatives are racist. You really are disgusting and awful people for telling such lies, and the fact that your Obama supports it shows that he is a disgusting and vile person as well.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — August 27, 2013 @ 11:25 pm - August 27, 2013

  4. Moreover, mike, we’re very aware of the fact that white liberals like yourself want to lynch black people who you don’t like, and in fact call conservative black people house N*****s, Uncle Toms, race traitors, and whores.

    Since you refuse to condemn and repudiate these statements, or to demand that your Obama Party condemn and repudiate them, you clearly are a racist.

    And we don’t take orders from racists. Nor do we think racists like yourself should be lecturing us.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — August 27, 2013 @ 11:30 pm - August 27, 2013

  5. Mike, why is “shuckin’ and jivin’” a “racially loaded” phrase but “Negro dialect” is not? Oh, wait. Sarah Palin said “shuckin’ and jivin’” but Harry Reid said “Negro dialect”. Never mind.

    Comment by Seane-Anna — August 28, 2013 @ 12:02 am - August 28, 2013

  6. Mike most of that “some” seems to come primarily from certain elements of the Left who in the absence of evident racism have to manufacture their own. In fact considering the Dem’s have always been racist, The party of slavery remember, we’re beginning to wonder if the false flag operations are really false or rather simply the Left’s true colors shining thru. Showing who you really are, the constant pretending most be a real pain.

    Comment by Catseye — August 28, 2013 @ 1:51 am - August 28, 2013

  7. Here’s a thought, mike. Instead of telling Conservatives to police their own, how about cleaning your own feces-encrusted houses?

    For all the Liberals accuse Conservatives of doing, Libbies are doing all that and MORE, all the time.

    Uncle Tom, House Ni**er — those lovely comments come from YOUR side of the aisle, mikey — and yet you have the simulated brass ones to accuse CONSERVATIVES of being racist?

    Hymietown, that came from YOUR side, mikey.

    How about you either address the rampant racism on your side of the aisle instead of projecting it onto others?

    Comment by acethepug — August 28, 2013 @ 6:05 am - August 28, 2013

  8. Does my opposition to Obama also mean I am anti white as Obama is half white himself?

    Comment by davinci — August 28, 2013 @ 9:53 am - August 28, 2013

  9. So as we see, mike refuses to repudiate documented and obvious racist statements coming from the Barack Obama Party and his fellow “progressives”.

    Therefore mike is a racist.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — August 28, 2013 @ 11:15 am - August 28, 2013

  10. Mike, like I said in the first reply post, it’s all Projection.

    “Psychological projection was conceptualized by Sigmund Freud in the 1890s as a defense mechanism in which a person unconsciously rejects his or her own unacceptable attributes by ascribing them to objects or persons in the outside world” – Wikipedia

    Comment by Juan — August 28, 2013 @ 11:19 am - August 28, 2013

  11. So let’s get this straight.

    Pictures and displays depicting President Bush as a monkey are OK, but those depicting Obama as one are racist.

    Pictures of Bush hanged in effigy are OK, but those of Obama being hanged are racist.

    And using the phrase “shucking and jiving” — which has a long history of being used in sports and other situations to describe folks of every race — is magically transformed into racism when deployed against Obama.

    Because the party of slavery, segregation, and the KKK says they are.

    Comment by Rhymes With Right — August 28, 2013 @ 8:23 pm - August 28, 2013

  12. Rymes:
    “Pictures and displays depicting President Bush as a monkey are OK, but those depicting Obama as one are racist.”

    Yes. Monkeys are a traditional symbols used to degenerate black people. Cannot use them. Find some other animal.

    hangings:
    Its never OK to show a picture of a person hanging. However, a noose has particular historical significance of being used to intimidate black people. Because of the history behind that symbol its worse to use it for Obama than for Bush.

    Seane-Anna
    shucking and jiving is used as race code for blacks being subservient to whites.

    Words/Symbols have dual meanings – like the swastika – and shouldn’t be used in the context of people of African decent. The history behind the symbol/phrase is why sometimes its acceptable to use a symbol in context with a white person, but NEVER with a black person.

    It might not be fair to those of you who enjoy using nooses & animals to make political points, but that is the way it goes in the reality of 2013.

    Comment by mike — August 29, 2013 @ 1:09 am - August 29, 2013

  13. shorter mike: It’s okay when Lefties do it!

    The “reality” of 2013 is that Democrats should familiarize themselves with “The Boy Who Cried Wolf,” they might learn something.

    Hypocrite. Microbe.

    Comment by acethepug — August 29, 2013 @ 6:16 am - August 29, 2013

  14. Actually mike demonstrates his ignorance two-fold.

    The tilted swasticka was a creation of Nazi Germany, as it showed the ‘motion’ of Germany.

    The static (resting on one ‘leg’) version is what is commonly found in Hindu art.

    But hey, never let facts get in the way of an argument.

    Comment by The_Livewire — August 29, 2013 @ 6:34 am - August 29, 2013

  15. Notice how the racist mike so hilariously equivocates for his Barack Obama Party’s racist hatred and beliefs.

    Yes. Monkeys are a traditional symbols used to degenerate black people. Cannot use them. Find some other animal.

    So racist mike, is portraying a white person as a monkey NOT “degenerating”?

    Or is the rule here that racists like Barack Obama can “degenerate” white people by portraying them as monkeys?

    The twaddle continues until we get to the main point.

    It might not be fair to those of you who enjoy using nooses & animals to make political points, but that is the way it goes in the reality of 2013.

    Comment by mike — August 29, 2013 @ 1:09 am – August 29, 2013

    Which, as I showed above, would be racist “progressives” and Obama supporters like you, mike, who display Republicans as animals and who put nooses on people like Sarah Palin, Clarence Thomas, and JC Watts.

    Since you won’t repudiate those actions, mike, clearly you support them. You support putting nooses on conservative politicians of every color and support portraying conservative politicians as animals. Thus you yourself are a racist and bigot by your own standards.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — August 29, 2013 @ 12:06 pm - August 29, 2013

  16. ““Pictures and displays depicting President Bush as a monkey are OK, but those depicting Obama as one are racist.”

    Yes. Monkeys are a traditional symbols used to degenerate black people. Cannot use them. Find some other animal.

    hangings:
    Its never OK to show a picture of a person hanging. However, a noose has particular historical significance of being used to intimidate black people. Because of the history behind that symbol its worse to use it for Obama than for Bush.

    Seane-Anna
    shucking and jiving is used as race code for blacks being subservient to whites.

    Words/Symbols have dual meanings – like the swastika – and shouldn’t be used in the context of people of African decent. The history behind the symbol/phrase is why sometimes its acceptable to use a symbol in context with a white person, but NEVER with a black person.

    It might not be fair to those of you who enjoy using nooses & animals to make political points, but that is the way it goes in the reality of 2013.”

    No. You are beyond wrong here. It does not matter if some of these things may have some historical context of being anti-black, or are offensive. It doesn’t even matter if actual racist comments are made.

    Because if Barry O the Very Slow can’t handle any heat, he needs to get out of the kitchen. (I’m sure you’ll think that’s racist as well.) Let him defend his policies on their own merits, if any. Crying “Racism!” isn’t defending anything, it’s simply an attempt to shut down debate and pretend that Barry is anything but a thin-skinned idiot.

    Comment by alanstorm — August 29, 2013 @ 12:09 pm - August 29, 2013

  17. mike,

    “Shucking and jiving” is not associated with subservience to whites. It is a term traced to the 1870′s that came out of Southern negro dialect. The “shucking” is loud, pretentious talk or banter. The “jiving” is shifting the topic and lying.

    The phrase was used in two general manners. One was to describe how the person got away from work and/or responsibility. The other was to describe another person who is avoiding work and/or responsibility.

    Sarah Palin used the term correctly when she accused Barack Obama of “shucking and jiving” over Benghazi.

    The term is not race specific. However, as blacks used it to call out the actions of (primarily) other blacks, it has been taken by some to be a uniquely black associated pejorative.

    Whether its use is politically correct depends almost exclusively on the ethos of the thought police.

    The hangman’s noose has been a strong symbol in many cultures throughout the world. The KKK used it, but it is not exclusively a racial threat.

    You will have to educate me on the association between people of African descent and the swastika. I am aware that Hitler chose to cleanse Germany of blacks, Jews, gays, Gypsies, infirm children and other categories which caught his whim.

    However, I believe that the political correctness police have awarded the swastika solely to the Jews. I am aware of David Duke and the National Socialist Party of America’s Skokie, Illinois activities. And even though both of Duke and the NSPA were essentially race purists, their targeted group was Jewish. If the blacks are attempting to co-opt the swastika, they have taken on a fruitless task.

    Your “rules of civility” at #12 strike me as political correctness fiats laid down by the existing order at a diversity re-education camp.

    Duck Dynasty is overwhelming the cable channels. They are making a near cult of being a “redneck.” Oh, my. Is being a “redneck” ever a positive thang? What next, watching NASCAR?

    I was a born and raised cracker. I can still fit right in with many of my cracker mates. Many years away from the daily world of crackerdom and lots of education and “intellectual world” association has given me other views and lifestyles to consider and appraise. But, I have a deep and abiding respect for the good and honest crackers. I modify that because bad and dishonest crackers have a lot in common with Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, Larry Summers, Jeffrey Immelt, Terry McCauliffe, David Axelrod, George Soros, Markos Moulitsas, Michael Moore, Chris Matthews, Rachael Maddow, etc. (or vice versa.)

    Your demagogic attempt to define the meanings is noted. It is classic shuck and jive.

    Comment by heliotrope — August 29, 2013 @ 12:16 pm - August 29, 2013

  18. Remember also that over 1200 whites were lynched by racist Democrats because of those whites standing up for civil rights for the blacks.

    Comment by Juan — August 29, 2013 @ 11:47 pm - August 29, 2013

  19. It is not ignorance. It is deliberate propaganda. The Democrats operate on Goebbels’ Big Lie principal.

    Comment by Mannie — August 30, 2013 @ 11:44 am - August 30, 2013

  20. Here is evidence of the Democrat Left’s Big Lie.
    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/08/30/LA-Times-Claims-Democrats-Led-Passage-Of-1964-Civil-Rights-Act

    Comment by Juan — August 30, 2013 @ 3:18 pm - August 30, 2013

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.