Gay Patriot Header Image

GLAAD Are Just Terrible People

Fresh from its “victory” over Duck Dynasty, the Fascist, Christian-Hating Bully-Boys and Bully-Womyn of GLAAD successfully threatened and intimidated old comedian Bob Newhart into canceling a scheduled appearance for a group of Catholic Businessmen. Ace comments:

GLAAD demands that Christians (fundmentalists, Catholics, those who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible) renounce a core part of their selves in order to join polite society. If they refuse, they will be excluded from society, by use of social pressure to harass, insult, humiliate, ostracize, and economically marginalize those Christians who do not fall into line.

Is GLAAD’s position so weak, so intellectually indefensible, that it cannot prevail in reasoned debate, and therefore all opposition must be bullied into silence? This is how America becomes divided and balkanized; because groups like GLAAD make civil disagreement impossible. “I disagree with what you say, but I will fight for our right to say it,” has become, “I disagree with what you say, and I will fight to see that you lose your job for saying it.”

And some will say, “Well, it’s all right, because the Government isn’t doing it, it’s just a private group.” No, it’s just technically legal for a private group to do it, that doesn’t make it right. The end result is a divided nation where civil debate is impossible.

Share

71 Comments

  1. There have been some isolated cases of individual priests breaking this rule, but the priests have usually been reprimanded by their bishops.

    Comment by Sean the Sharmuta — December 28, 2013 @ 12:04 am – December 28, 2013

    Even more hilarious: Lord_Byron and his fellow Obama supporters ENDORSED a Roman Catholic priest using the pulpit to push political candidates when it benefitted Barack Obama.

    Liberals like Lord_Byron are completely amoral scum. They have no sense of right and wrong, no objective values, and will say and do anything to get political power.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — December 28, 2013 @ 12:13 am - December 28, 2013

  2. @ Lord Byron

    Just give it up, man, and be grateful you didn’t get called a barebacking bugchaser.

    Comment by Mike Roberts — December 28, 2013 @ 1:31 am - December 28, 2013

  3. And some will say, “Well, it’s all right, because the Government isn’t doing it, it’s just a private group.” No, it’s just technically legal for a private group to do it, that doesn’t make it right.

    Aww, still butthurt about being corrected re. the definition of censorship? No one was arguing whether it was the right thing to do. In fact, it was made very clear (to those of even average intelligence) that suspending/firing Robertson was a stupid decision for A&E’s bottom line, for their hypocrisy, and in acquiescing to a vocal minority. The issue was (and still is, apparently) that A&E did not censor Robertson, in contradiction to what was posited on this site, repeatedly and erroneously. And idiotically.

    Comment by Ignatius — December 28, 2013 @ 1:38 am - December 28, 2013

  4. And another thing:

    Lady_Byron is a barebacking bugchaser!

    Comment by Jman1961 — December 28, 2013 @ 2:01 am - December 28, 2013

  5. Sean,

    I don’t care if your church wants to remind it’s followers of the religious tenants. As a side note it’s amazing how many catholics don’t accept said tenants, but that is another issue. What I don’t like is when religious leaders tell people specifically who they should vote for and who they shouldn’t. I am talking about the yearly Pulpit Freedom Sunday in which they tape themselves explicitly endorsing candidates, record it, and then send it to the irs in hopes of having their tax exempt status challenged so they can sue over not being allowed to act in politics.

    Because like a good little Obama puppet, you scream and cry and defend the Palestinian Authority, Hamas, and the theocratic government of Iran for doing exactly that, and you said nothing when Saddam Hussein did it.

    Clearly you are a troll, but to respond to your statement I do not support hamas nor any theocracy. The world would be much better in my opinion if all governments were secular, but that probably will never happen. Saddam did not persecute gay people. He gassed groups of people, but he did not attack gay people specifically for being gay. If you talk to any LGBT person in Iraq, many of whom have fled or live in safe houses, they would tell you that it was better for gays under saddam. There were no roving bands of religious fundamentalist looking to kill gay people. There was not rampant raping of gay men and trans women. Not saying things were perfect, far from it, but things were better under saddam according to many Iraqi lgbt individuals.

    That radio host was wrong and the majority of gay individuals do not want to take away the constitutional right to vote, but since you are just trolling here you will ignore that. You will also ignore the fact that your favorite ice queen, Coulter, said that all women should have their right to vote removed because they tend to vote democrat.

    Not blaming Jews for the attacks of hamas. I simply pointed out that there have been attacks on women and lgbt individuals by Jews.
    Eight Year Old Girl Attacked

    Then there is the case of three Jewish youths opening fire on a gay youth center in Tel Aviv.

    In this debate tell me which side has spawned more violent actions and hatred because I can tell you it is not mine. I do not call for people to be imprisoned, executed, tortured, castrated, hanged, whipped, cut off from society, or to have their hearts cut out and bodies burned. Conservatives have spawned the push for numerous anti-gay bills in this country and in others now and historically.

    Comment by Lord_Byron — December 28, 2013 @ 4:18 am - December 28, 2013

  6. @ Lord_Byron: If you are implying that Catholic priests take part in Free Pulpit Sundays, you are sadly mistaken. Catholic priests are often under explicit instructions from their bishops not to participate in these events. And what about Rev. Jeremiah Wright? He very openly campaigned for Obama in the 2012 election. So

    Comment by Sean — December 28, 2013 @ 6:32 am - December 28, 2013

  7. Perhaps I should thank Lord Byron for illustrating the point I made in the last paragraph of the post; his attitude does make civil debate in this country impossible. And he is quite proud of the fact that he is unwilling to be decent or civil toward people who disagree with him.

    Comment by V the K — December 28, 2013 @ 6:55 am - December 28, 2013

  8. Aww, still butthurt about being corrected re. the definition of censorship?

    You’re still butthurt about that? Bummer. I know I demolished your weak and pathetic and completely inaccurate argument that only the Government can censor, but you should be over the butthurt by now.

    Comment by V the K — December 28, 2013 @ 6:57 am - December 28, 2013

  9. Ah i apologize. It was James Edward who was saying offensive speech should be canned. Hate filled leftie trolls, they all sound alike to me.

    I am amused that he believes 10 year olds can marry in California, and I can own a P90.

    Comment by The_Livewire — December 28, 2013 @ 9:34 am - December 28, 2013

  10. Lord_Byron @ #55:

    I simply pointed out that there have been attacks on women and lgbt individuals by Jews. Eight Year Old Girl Attacked (link)

    Then there is the case of three Jewish youths opening fire on a gay youth center in Tel Aviv.

    Why should anyone ever be surprised that one can find evidence of homophobia in any given country. What is the point?

    Lord_Byron proclaimed in the same comment that: Saddam did not persecute gay people. Period. I have no particular knowledge to the contrary, but I would hardly put Saddam on a pedestal of worship for any particular type of loving tolerance.

    But the leap from exposing homophobes in Israel to this drivel is beyond comprehension in terms of developing a point:

    In this debate tell me which side has spawned more violent actions and hatred because I can tell you it is not mine. I do not call for people to be imprisoned, executed, tortured, castrated, hanged, whipped, cut off from society, or to have their hearts cut out and bodies burned. Conservatives have spawned the push for numerous anti-gay bills in this country and in others now and historically.

    Holy Toledo, Cap’n Crunch!!! You telling me that “Conservatives have spawned the push for numerous anti-gay bills in this country and in others now and historically” which has led to a:

    call for people to be imprisoned, executed, tortured, castrated, hanged, whipped, cut off from society, or to have their hearts cut out and bodies burned.

    Lord_Byron, you got some ‘splainin’ to do.

    Obviously, from the pious perch of Lord_Byron, conservatives are the root of all evil and they are aided and abetted in their malicious, low-down, dirty rotten skunkery by their religion. I get it. That is the opinion of Lord_Byron. It is not an argument. It is a conclusion which he dares one and all to attempt to talk him down from. Why would anyone waste the time? His mind is made up and facts play no role in his opinion making.

    The Pajama Boy said this:

    “I am a Liberal Fu*k,” Krupp wrote in one post. “A Liberal Fu*k is not a Democrat, but rather someone who combines political data and theory, extreme leftist views and sarcasm to win any argument while make the opponents feel terrible about themselves.

    At least Pajama Boy knows who he is and what he is doing. Lord_Byron is just a run of the mill liberal with a drool cup.

    Comment by heliotrope — December 28, 2013 @ 11:17 am - December 28, 2013

  11. As a side note it’s amazing how many catholics don’t accept said tenants, but that is another issue.

    Yes, we all know that “Catholics” like John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, and Joe Biden support infanticide like Kermit Gosnell performed, rape and sexual harassment like Bob Filner and Ted Kennedy performed, and crimes like Jon Corzine performed.

    You might note the absolute correlation between opposition to Catholicism and support of Barack Obama. It’s because Barack Obama and the Obama Party are jealous gods who will not tolerate any religious belief that does not support and endorse full governmental takeover of everything.

    I am talking about the yearly Pulpit Freedom Sunday in which they tape themselves explicitly endorsing candidates, record it, and then send it to the irs in hopes of having their tax exempt status challenged so they can sue over not being allowed to act in politics.

    Are you unfamiliar with the First Amendment, perhaps?

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    The latter is what a lawsuit IS.

    The problem here is that these churches may not be pushing Barack Obama. Were they pushing Barack Obama and the Barack Obama Party you and your Barack Obama Party would be fully endorsing them, as you already do.

    Next:

    Saddam did not persecute gay people. He gassed groups of people, but he did not attack gay people specifically for being gay. If you talk to any LGBT person in Iraq, many of whom have fled or live in safe houses, they would tell you that it was better for gays under saddam. There were no roving bands of religious fundamentalist looking to kill gay people. There was not rampant raping of gay men and trans women. Not saying things were perfect, far from it, but things were better under saddam according to many Iraqi lgbt individuals.

    LOL, yup, the ones who were screaming in 2003 how awful Iraq was and then who flip-flopped after being paid by leftists to smear George W. Bush.

    The fact that you are deluded enough to defend and endorse Saddam Hussein shows the problem.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — December 28, 2013 @ 11:45 am - December 28, 2013

  12. In this debate tell me which side has spawned more violent actions and hatred because I can tell you it is not mine. I do not call for people to be imprisoned, executed, tortured, castrated, hanged, whipped, cut off from society, or to have their hearts cut out and bodies burned.

    Comment by Lord_Byron — December 28, 2013 @ 4:18 am – December 28, 2013

    Actually, the LGBT community calls for the disenfranchisement and death of those they dislike.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — December 28, 2013 @ 12:07 pm - December 28, 2013

  13. And don’t forget LGBT hero Floyd Lee Corker, who acknowledged he was carrying out orders from the LGBT community to kill as many Christians as possible.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — December 28, 2013 @ 12:16 pm - December 28, 2013

  14. And now, let’s return to this:

    Saddam did not persecute gay people. He gassed groups of people, but he did not attack gay people specifically for being gay.

    Comment by Lord_Byron — December 28, 2013 @ 4:18 am – December 28, 2013

    Lie.

    Hili, who has a bachelor’s degree in English literature, and who used to work for Iraqi radio and television, fled to the U.K. in 2002 after having been persecuted for being gay under Saddam Hussein…..

    “In the late ‘80s and early ‘90s there were a couple of gay clubs in Baghdad,” Hili explained, “but they were all shut down in 1993 after sanctions were imposed against Saddam’s regime and Iraq. We had a weekly gay nightclub in the Palestine Hotel that became the gathering place for gay people, especially for actors and others in the entertainment world, but it, too, was shut down. I was arrested three times for being gay, and tortured. After several attempts, I finally was able to escape the country, going first to Dubai, then Jordan, then Syria, and finally reaching England.”

    And who is responsible for the activity now in Iraq, pray tell?

    The Abu Nawas Group, according to Hili, is accumulating evidence that Iranian agents are advising SCIRI and the Iranian police on how to implement anti-gay persecution. Not only has Iran’s Internet entrapment campaign targeting gays been adopted in Iraq, he said, but there are reports that Iranian agents have been involved in interrogations, questioning those arrested in Persian through translators.

    So these very same groups that are screaming about conditions in Iraq are praising and pushing Barack Obama’s Iran and the Iranian government, who are the ones driving intolerance in Iraq.

    So tell us, Lord_Byron: why do you and your fellow gay-sex bigots who scream about conditions in Iraq, Israel, and Uganda ignore Iran, Palestine, and other countries? Why do you rant and cry about Christians when you give money to and support Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam, who advocate the murder of gays right here in the United States?

    Answer: Because whether or not you consider someone “homophobic” is directly correlated with whether or not they support and endorse Barack Obama and the Barack Obama Party, and has nothing in fact to do with their treatment of gays.

    You are a hypocrite, Lord_Byron. You only care about pushing Barack Obama and liberalism. You support and endorse killing gays and anti-gay rhetoric when Barack Obama needs it.

    That is backed up by facts. You have none.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — December 28, 2013 @ 1:54 pm - December 28, 2013

  15. And for a nice chaser, let’s point out how Lord_Byron endorses and supports raping women.

    Now, according to Lord_Byron, calling for people to be stripped of their rights, raped, and murdered is not, repeat NOT, hate speech.

    And actually heading out with a gun to shoot people, with the encouragement and support of the LGBT community and its organizations, is not a hate crime.

    For anyone else, it would be. But according to Lord_Byron, gays and lesbians like himself can call for and carry out the murder of Christians with absolutely no criminal or social constraints.

    Sick.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — December 28, 2013 @ 2:17 pm - December 28, 2013

  16. Link for Lord_Byron and the LGBT community, including GLAAD, endorsing and supporting rape: http://m.nydailynews.com/1.321411#bmb=1

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — December 28, 2013 @ 2:19 pm - December 28, 2013

  17. Lord_Byron, you say that the world would be a better place if all governments were secular, then you admit that Saddam Hussein gassed people. Saddam Hussein’s government was secular, as was Hitler’s, Stalin’s, Mao’s, Castro’s, Ho Chi Minh’s, and Hafez al Asad’s, just to name a few. Clearly, secularism does not guarantee democracy and freedom. But for you all that matters is the well-being of gay people, and so long as people aren’t imprisoned, tortured, and/or executed specifically for being gay everything is all right. And you think conservatives are warped. Physician, heal thyself.

    Comment by Seane-Anna — December 28, 2013 @ 2:45 pm - December 28, 2013

  18. Odd — isn’t this what we hear called “bullying” when targeted at folks that GLAAD and others like?

    Comment by Rhymes With Right — December 28, 2013 @ 3:47 pm - December 28, 2013

  19. I know I demolished your weak and pathetic and completely inaccurate argument that only the Government can censor…

    Nope. You’re just too small and stupid to admit you’re wrong. And too butthurt.

    Comment by Ignatius — December 28, 2013 @ 6:02 pm - December 28, 2013

  20. […] Defining quote: “Is GLAAD’s position so weak, so intellectually indefensible, that it cannot prevail in reasoned debate, and therefore all opposition must be bullied into silence? This is how America becomes divided and balkanized; because groups like GLAAD make civil disagreement impossible.” — V the K at GayPatriot […]

    Pingback by The 20 Most Annoying Liberals of 2013 — January 7, 2014 @ 1:39 pm - January 7, 2014

  21. […]  Defining quote: ”Is GLAAD’s position so weak, so intellectually indefensible, that it cannot prevail in reasoned debate, and therefore all opposition must be bullied into silence? This is how America becomes divided and balkanized; because groups like GLAAD make civil disagreement impossible.” – V the K at GayPatriot […]

    Pingback by The 20 Most Annoying Liberals of 2013 | Give Me Liberty — January 9, 2014 @ 8:01 pm - January 9, 2014

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.