Should an elected representative be removed from a legislative assembly if he is convicted of felony domestic violence. Not if he’s a black Democrat says the NAACP.
On Thursday afternoon, the Massachusetts House of Representatives will vote on whether or not to expel Rep. Carlos Henriquez (D-MA) who is currently serving a six-month sentence for holding down and beating his then girlfriend because she didn’t want to have sex. Strangely, the NAACP is urging the House to allow Henriquez to keep his seat.
The Massachusetts House of Representatives voted to expel him anyway. (Warning: Effing Autoplay). They must be racists. Two of those who voted against expelling him were women. That’s interesting.
Fascinating. Apparently one of the people who voted against expulsion argued that there were no rules against someone convicted of a crime and presently serving time in jail from serving in the state legislature.
I wonder if he would be making the same argument if Carlos had been a white Republican.
There may not be an explicit rule, but it sounds like a reasonable standard to hold members to.
In my state, someone with such a conviction would be barred for life from owning a BB gun. When you consider the number of people a state Representative could potentially harm, and to what degree, it may not be such a bad idea to throw the bum out.
In other news, gay porn actor Mike Dozer has been charged with the statutory rape of a 14 year old boy. Dozer met the boy on a dating app and had sex with the boy in the boy’s Montgomery County, PA home. Dozer’s lawyer claims that Dozer found out that the boy was underage (the age of sexual consent in PA is 16, in case you were confused) and attempted to leave, but the boy “kept pursuing him and apparently had cones so with others.”
But the whole thing gets even more twisted. Dozer performs “bareback,” which is gay slang for engaging in anal sex without the protection of condoms. Dozer also not only advocates bareback sex, but goes so far as to be “anti-condom,” famously owning a shirt that reads, “Condoms are for p****es.” In a twist that may not be so surprising, Dozer is apparently HIV+. Because of this revelation, Dozer has also been charged with reckless endangerment. Dozer’s lawyer claims that this additional charge is “homophobic” because individuals with other communicable diseases, including STDs, are not charged with reckless endangerment.
The charging has sent shock waves through the gay community and the gay porn industry due to the fact that Dozer appeared on at least one site that features bareback sex scenes, but prefaces these videos with a message that all the men who appear in them are HIV-.
Sordid and disgusting. Remind me why “sexual liberation” is such a good thing, but “waiting until marriage” is horribly oppressive? I’m glad I don’t associate with this self-destructive hell of a victim group.
Now, this is THE real “WAR ON WOMEN:”
http://chicksontheright.com/posts/item/25381-you-will-not-believe-this-woman-s-story-must-watch
When the power and might of a run away government does this to her citizens, then, it is time to replace that government by any means necessary.
I would love to hear from the libs that visit this blog and explain this one away. Hmmmmmmmm
Oh, common. Beating your girlfriend doesn’t make you a misogynist, voting against abortion makes you a misogynist. Every liberal knows this. It’s like day one of crazy leftist 101.
But the man is a liberal black Hispanic. He can never be held responsible for his own actions due to the racism of our great great great great grandfathers.
But Mitt Romney put women in binders and a dog on the roof of his car!!! Outrageous!
Dozer’s lawyer claims that Dozer found out that the boy was underage and attempted to leave, but the boy “kept pursuing him and apparently had cones so with others.”
Damn those teenage boys and their cunning wiles; luring innocent gay men to have sex with them.
I know, V. It’s gross. The prosecution is saying that he used poppers (inhaled aphrodisiacs that cause light-headedness, fyi) to incapacitate the boy. So another form of rape on top of it. Even if he isn’t proven guilty, this guy is tainted. A lot of guys will not want to watch his work after this. When people say that gays are depraved, it’s sometimes hard to argue when you have cases like this. Although, I am seeing nobody support this guy on the gay sites. So at least there’s that.
This guy is symptomatic of the libertinism that is affecting Millennial gay men: a total ambivalence or willful ignorance towards HIV, and no regard for other men’s health. The first guy who tries to get me to do bareback sex is going to get kicked out the door faster than he can say “promiscuous.” Better yet, he’ll be willing to wait to consummate the relationship until after at least a couple years of dating. I’m not taking chances.
The problem is that he wasn’t a Republican that calls women “honey.” Now THAT would have been demeaning.
Why haven’t any of our resident trolls shown up to defend the indefensible? Michael? Passing Gas? Anyone?