Getting back to the Silly Left and their crazy notions that there are at least fifty genders and probably a whole lot more . Looking over the list, one sees that “Butch,” “Lipstick Lesbians” “Soft Butch,” and “Tomboy” are all considered separate genders. There are similar variations on themes throughout the list; usually differentiated only by minor behavioral quirks.
So, from this, we can derive the Silly Left definition of “gender,” which appears to consist of two parts: 1. How does a person feel about their sexual identity and 2. How does a person outwardly express their sexual identity.
By this definition, isn’t “Bully” a gender? Bullies have unique patterns of self-identity that are very often rooted in their sexual identity; and their behavior is an outward expression of that identity. So, by the Silly Left definition, is “Bully” a gender, and are the anti-bullying campaigns that have been so trendy recently an assault on gender?
See, there you go again …. using that silly logic and consistency in relation to leftoid thought. Pure folly, that.
And what about “rapist” and “pedophile”? Are they not also defined by a unique patterns of self-identity that are very often rooted in their sexual identity; and their behavior is an outward expression of that identity?
OMG – What would old Theodore the Rose-Velvet say? Bully!! Bull-Moose?!?
This list makes a strong case for inclusion. We should embrace “it” as the gender of record for, say, a transgender lipstick lesbian.
Any male or female wishing to come out as the other gender of a combination of both genders should be awarded the third gender classification of “it” or “d.p” which stands for “decision pending.” When the individual takes charge of defining it’s own sexual identity then it is clearly an “it” of record.
I am underwhelmed by the premise asserted in this nugget taken from the link:
Wow. There is a “force” that assigns gender at birth! Who knew? So, gender is not a biological construct, after all. Gender is ephemeral, transitory, fickle. Today a bully butch; tomorrow a fey rhinestone cowboy.
What leaps out at me is that this whole “dilemma” deals with difficulty in social interactions due to carrying out daily life activities which are at variance with common social behavior, thus inviting the nomenclature of “bizarre” behavior. This is a key symptom of psychosis.
Since the person can not live comfortably as male or female (“as assigned to them at birth”) the person must do battle with gender and water the concept down into a meaningless list of psychobabble possibilities in order to obscure the concept of gender.
Good luck on that! Every expecting mother is asked if she knows “what it will be.” Only a tiny and tinged fringe of lunatics respond: “Oh, it will have to make its mind up as it goes along in life. Gender is optional, you know.”
Does “Stupid” count as a gender, too?
Regards,
Peter H.
Look down at the sexual equipment you have below the waist. Not what you WANT to have, but what you have.
THAT’S what gender you are. Want to say you are something else? Fine, but no one else is obligated to humor you.
Sorry for the bluntness.
Christ, the anti-transgender arguments are 100% identical to the anti-gay arguments from religious social conservatives.
If the argument is that transgender people should just pretend to act like non-trans people and just comform to whatever social traditionalisms their told, then how does that not apply to gays also?
“Look down at the sexual equipment you have below the waist. Not what you WANT to have, but what you have. Have something dangling? Then forget being attracted to men. Just have sex with women. Do it. What part do you have? If it’s male genitals, then you are made by nature to have female partners. Nature designed you to do that. Nature gave you a TAB A fitting into SLOT B. Homosexuals turn into straight people and back again all of the time. You should choose to be straight.” – etc
Shortly before he died, Benjamin Franklin answered a query from Ezra Stiles: As to Jesus of Nazareth, my opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the system of morals, and his religion, as he left them to us, the best the world ever saw, or is likely to see…
SwiperTheFox blames a great deal on religious social conservatives. The conundrum here is that there is none among all the men who have entered this world, except Christ, who occupies a position in the moral world of men that is analogous to that of the sun in the natural world. Take Christ and His teachings and his influence out of the world, and what secondary singularity of a life that lived or is living rises to take His place?
Christ is the embodiment of all that is good and excellent and He sets the example of excellence and moral perfection. What is there in Christ that anyone need be ashamed, when Christ clearly is not ashamed of anyone?
Pantheism, Rationalism, Positivism, Naturalism, Deism, et. al. have established no form of ethic or morality. They have no exemplar. What is it in Christianity that should be suppressed to give precedent to Mohammedanism, Deism, atheism, Nihilism or infidelity itself?
SwiperTheFox has it all in for religious social conservatives. Who are they and what have they done to deserve this attack?
If it is the Phelps crowd, you know where they are and they number in the dozens so a small crusade of angry gays ought to be able to take them out handily.
This shadow boxing with boogie men is a little sad.
When individuals tried to puff themselves up by expanding their numbers under the L-G-B-T shield, did they agree to take on all the issues of each group?
Well, if so, what is the social utility of introducing an unspecified number of genders based on ephemeral and transitory social justice motives and initiatives?
A little logical discourse is in order.
This is another in a long list of examples on the damage done to the culture when you let a miniscule percentage of the populace make the rules and set the agenda for the overwhelming majority.
I’m willing to go as far as ‘male’, ‘female’ and ‘it’ (or ‘undetermined’, ‘don’t know’, ‘miscellaneous’, if you like), and not one step beyond that.
The cultural descent into madness continues…
Well it appears that Wiper the Fox is offended.
Mayhaps it should lay on the fainting couch and eat something? That should take care of it.
If a man walks into a psychiatrist’s office and says “I’m Napoleon,” the psychiatrist will say, “Obviously, there’s something wrong with your head. Let’s try and fix it.”
But if a man walks into a psychiatrist’s office and says, “I’m a woman!” The psychiatrist is supposed to say. “Yes, ma’am. You sure are. Let’s get you started on hormone therapy and get a surgeon to rid you of that pesky external genitalia.”