Gay Patriot Header Image

Five Acts of Islamic Terror the US Government Won’t Call Islamic Terror

Posted by V the K at 8:49 am - September 29, 2014.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

A Mohammedan beheaded a female co-worker in Oklahoma last week in an act the Obama Regime is labeling “workplace violence.” Another Mohammedan has committed a series of killings of Americans in order to “avenge” the deaths of his fellow Mohammedans, but it is not being investigated as Islamist terror.

The Government of the United States is pathologically averse to labeling acts of violence committed by Mohammedans for the purpose of waging jihad as “Islamic terror.” Here are some examples.

  • Fort Hood Mass Shooting – Islamist Army Major Nadal Hassan shot and killed 13 people while shouting “Allahu Akhbar!”  (Note, a Clinton Era policy requires American military personnel to be disarmed while on base; which is why no one was able to stop the shooting.) The Obama Administration has officially labeled this an act of “workplace violence,” not Islamic Terror.
  • Trolley Square Shootings – February 12, 2007, A Muslim immigrant goes on a shooting rampage at a mall, targeting people buying Valentine’s Day cards at a gift shop, shouting “Allahu Akhbar!” Five people were killed, four injured. Not an act of terrorism according to the FBI, who claim it is impossible to discern any motive behind the attack.
  • The Beltway Sniper Attacks of 2002 – John Allen Muhammed — a member of the Nation of Islam and jihadist — killed 10 people one-by-one in a terror campaigned accompanied by his catamite, Lee Boyd Malvo. Muhemmed was charged and tried as a terrorist… by the State of Virginia, not by the Federal Government. The Federal Government does not regard the Beltway shootings as Islamic Terror.
  • Egyptair Flight 990 – In October 1999, a radicalized Egyptian pilot seized the controls of a Transatlantic jet and plunged it into the ocean shouting, “I rely on Allah.” 217 people were killed, including 100 Americans. The destruction of Flight 990 is not considered an act of terror by the US Government.
  • Any Act of Savagery Committed by the Islamic State — According to the Obama Administration, the Islamic State is not really Islamic (despite their state goal of establishing an, um, Islamic State). Ipso facto, nothing they do constitutes Islamic Terrorism.

You may draw your own conclusions about why the United States Government is so reluctant to address these incidents as terroristic violence motivated by jihad. [And maybe terrorism isn’t quite the right word for when Mohammedans kill people they hate for not being Mohammedans, but there should be such a word, yes?]

Update: In addition to denying that Islamic Terrorist exists, the Obama Administration is also apparently making up fake Islamic terror groups so they can launch pretend attacks against pretend groups and pretend to look tough before the election.



  1. They’re still trying to think of ways to blame all of these on the Tea Party.

    Comment by Southern Man — September 29, 2014 @ 9:46 am - September 29, 2014

  2. Maybe we should just call it what it is — Savage Acts of Islamic Jihadism — and leave it at that.

    “Terrorism” is too-common a term, and morally lets’ the rest of the Islamic community of the hook. It’s not going to stop as long as the Islamic Community complicity-accepts jihad as a morally-acceptable outlet of rage and frustration. Let them be offended…then maybe they’ll act.

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — September 29, 2014 @ 10:22 am - September 29, 2014

  3. Yes, there is a name for it. Jihad.

    Islam is forgiven, excused and apologized for one simple reason: because it is a Third World religion, non-White, and therefore sacrosanct. It is coded as a non-White race and thus given all the fraudulent perks enjoyed by Blacks (and Latinos), courtesy of Whites, The Most Foolish People On The Planet.

    Comment by EssEm — September 29, 2014 @ 12:42 pm - September 29, 2014

  4. It’s worth noting the depth of depravity that Melissa Harris Perry plumbed, in her commentary. From RCP (V’s link):

    Oklahoma…is a story that I read as workplace violence story…a gentleman…beheaded a woman in the context of his having been fired then he goes back to the plant. He stabs several people. One of the women, her head is severed.

    First, note Harris Perry’s violence-minimizing use of the passive voice, “her head is severed”, like it’s only an accidental result of a bit of knife-poking.

    Next – Even in Harris Perry’s narrative, a *man* beheaded a *woman* in a workplace context of his having been fired. But hang on, Melissa. Surely he targeted that woman intentionally? Because, say, she was the one who fired him? or who refused his advances? Was she his boss? Or, if he didn’t know her, then did he simply hate (liberated) women? You know the type, Melissa…Western women like you. Was the man a misogynist?

    Where I’m going with this: If the man were a right-wing Christian – well, first of all, as a Christian, he totally never would have beheaded his female boss or other women, but bear with me – if he were, then Perry would surely be touting the episode as an example of #SexistRethuglicanChristofascistReichwingWomanhaterWarOnWomen.

    I mean, *if* singling out 2 women for stabbing is just a “workplace” act, then it would have to be a darn sexist act, right? But somehow, Islamic sexism – what actually results in horrible deaths / mutilations of women, in today’s world – escapes lefties’ radar.

    P.S. For the record: the guy is black, which matters to me NOT in the least, except that maybe it could be another factor (plus Islamic) in accounting for Harris Perry’s seeming blind spots.

    *If* it wasn’t an Islamist crime, then it had to be a viciously sexist crime. Harris Perry doesn’t seem to notice.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 29, 2014 @ 3:50 pm - September 29, 2014

  5. I thought something was fishy about Khorasan. I had never heard of it, and I like to think that I try to stay informed about the world. Especially considering the fact that there’s been some talk among the media, even right-wing sites, that “Khorasan” was the super-shadowy group that had been a part of the 9/11 attacks.

    The fact of the matter is, “Khorasan” is nothing more than the name of the Afghan-Iranian border region, and it has a major part in the lore of jihad. The members of the group are not “core al-Qaeda”- whatever the heck that is. They are members of one faction of al-Qaeda’s Syrian franchise. That’s it. Not some new boogieman, just members of the same old one.

    Comment by Sean L — September 29, 2014 @ 4:01 pm - September 29, 2014

  6. Targets of US drone-strikes are whomever the POTUS says is a “terrorist”…enemies foreign and domestic.

    How — convenient!

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — September 29, 2014 @ 5:23 pm - September 29, 2014

  7. @ V_K you are a bad ghey for forgetting the arson attack on a packed Seattle gay club early this year. If you don’t play the victim card people will stop inviting you to eightsomes in graveyards and by the railroad tracks.

    You guys also forgot last months Jersey Jihadist mass murderer Ali Muhammad Brown ,>.>, <.<, who just so happens to be black, where his last victim was an actual angel that the left tried to portray as a criminal that hung around with assassins.

    Don't forget to cast ghey aspersions at the 3 male neighbors of the Boston Marathon brothers that where all beheaded, that no one was unPC enough to connect to Islam until after the Marathon.

    Comment by Steve — September 29, 2014 @ 7:22 pm - September 29, 2014

  8. Just remember they say only 15-25% of muslims are (whatever you want to call the ones that follow in Moo ham mad’s footsteps). So more of them are likely to only cheer beheaders on than actually behead you.

    Actual muslim cheering after the OK beheading

    Alton Nolen: religious black man gunned down by white racist – Al Sharpton is calling for an investigation into the incident; citing the fact that the black victim only had a knife, while the white shooter had a gun. It raises the question of why excessive firepower was used against a man who clearly posed no threat to the community. Sharpton demands to know why the victim was racially profiled for practicing his religion. He calls the attack “Worshiping while black.”
    ~Olga Photoshopova thepeoplescube

    Comment by Steve — September 29, 2014 @ 7:29 pm - September 29, 2014

  9. @4: amazing how progs label an unwanted kiss as rape (trivializing “rape”) while labeling a beheading by a Muslim as “Allahu Akbar” (according to Mark Steyn, Allahu Akbar is Arab for “nothing to see here”).

    The Islamists state, repeatedly, that they are at war with the west but our leaders (GWB included) have chosen to ignore this.

    Comment by KCRob — September 29, 2014 @ 7:58 pm - September 29, 2014

  10. 2006 hit and run at the Jewish Center in San Francisco by a moslem guy.

    BTW, how idiotic does one have to be to refer to some beast that beheads someone as a “gentleman.” Gentlemen treat women like ladies, not like animals to be slaughtered.

    Comment by Lee — September 29, 2014 @ 8:24 pm - September 29, 2014

  11. I moved to Salt Lake City over a year ago and read all about the Trolley Square incident after I noticed a rather large enclave of very religious Muslims nearby.
    When I was looking for some Greek food I discovered a market that stocks huge piles (50 to 100) of those long knives (three feet long!) that Shi’ite Muslims use to slash themselves during Ashura every year.
    That is more than a bit troubling.
    Are they allowed to beat themselves bloody on the public streets here?
    So far I haven’t seen it, but I wonder.
    Ashura is coming up, between Oct and Nov depending on a lunar calender, so I guess I’ll find out.

    Comment by Nanny G — September 30, 2014 @ 3:49 am - September 30, 2014

  12. Nanny G

    Welcome to the new normal:
    Folsom Street Fair… that’s fine

    Blood in the streets…. That’s just Ashura. Celebrate Diversity, man!

    Christians wanting to practice their faith… that’s a line too far.

    Comment by The_Livewire — September 30, 2014 @ 6:51 am - September 30, 2014

  13. BTW, how idiotic does one have to be to refer to some beast that beheads someone as a “gentleman.”

    Exactly. I should have called that out in #4, thanks Lee.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 30, 2014 @ 9:14 am - September 30, 2014

  14. These 5 acts aren’t iSlamic terror, they’re just normal iSlam. The koran commands muslims to murder, convert, or enslave all non muslims.

    See this site for more than any sane person should tolerate:

    Comment by MPH — September 30, 2014 @ 4:48 pm - September 30, 2014

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.