First of all, normal people neither know nor care who Lena Dunham is. She has a show on HBO that very few people watch, she made a campaign commercial for Barack Obama comparing voting for Obama to having sex with Obama, and she is absolutely adored on the Democrat media left. The Left considers her the voice of her generation.
Her father, Carroll Dunham, is a painter noted for his primitive brand of highbrow pornography, his canvases anchored by puffy neon-pink labia; her photographer mother filled the family home with nude pictures of herself, “legs spread defiantly.” Self-styled radicals from old money, they were not the sort of people inclined to enforce even the most lax of boundaries.
So, basically, she was raised the way left-wing progressives think children should be raised. And then there’s this tidbit.
Dunham writes of casually masturbating while in bed next to her younger sister, of bribing her with “three pieces of candy if I could kiss her on the lips for five seconds . . . anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying.” At one point, when her sister is a toddler, Lena Dunham pries open her vagina — “my curiosity got the best of me,” she offers, as though that were an explanation. “This was within the spectrum of things I did.”
This is also within the spectrum of things that result in foster care.
Apparently, Ms. Dunham is upset that “right-wingers” disapprove of her molesting her little sister, and later bragging about it. I guess she believes it’s the sort of thing only “right-wingers” get upset about.
She is a narcissist just like Obama. Both are so into themselves they can not see how ill they are.
If you read the original source material and find it and ascribe sexual motives to it, rather than the innocent curiosity of a young child (in a particularly disgusting lie, one right-wing website said Dunham was 17 at the time, when she was actually a small child), then you, sir, are the pervert.
Given the environment her parents created, I doubt it was innocent. And even if it were, to write about such things as an adult is perverted and creepy.
And Evan thinks it’s cute? Eeewwwww.
Pornography as “art” has been around since the first sex depiction pottery was made back in the almost civilized days of yore. Evan undoubtedly has plenty of defense for Anthony Wiener’s sending erection greetings to casual acquaintances on his cell phone.
Morality, for Progressives, is so repressive. This Lena Dunham appears to need the support of perverts in order to receive any attention to her plain, lard-laden, unremarkable mini-celebrity.
Evan: the fact that you try and squeeze Lena Dunham’s perversity and molestation of her younger sister through the window of simple “curiosity”—all in an attempt to cast “right wingers” as uptight—tells everyone more about you than it does those nasty “right wingers”. The fact that you are not disgusted by what would otherwise be a psychologically-damaging act towards her younger sister…but instead defend it is, well…enlightening.
Both you and Ms. Dunham need help.
Who cares what a narcissistic slut thinks?
Anybody ask Lena’s baby sister how she feels about this? Aren’t Democrats “all about the children?”
Oh, good. I was hoping we’d hear from the creepy pervert in the nondescript white van. Thanks for chiming in, Evan. 🙂
Who cares what a narcissistic slut thinks?
Well, nobody, but Evan posts here just the same.
In a lot of states if a child is more than three years older than the child she is abusing it is considered a sex crime. I think NY state might be one of them. The statute of limitations runs out seven years after the victim’s birthday. So yes, legally Lena Dunham is a sex offender. There are kids as young as nine on the federal sex offender registry so obviously some are prosecuted. Her family has money though so they’ll probably make it go away.
one word to describe her – eewwwww!
What could be worse than cops igoring the rape of 2000+ little white girls by muslims in the UK due to fears of being called racist? People noticing a pattern of course.
http://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-the-real-danger-in-rotherham-stereotyping/
I’ll bet you if Lena Dunham was Larry Dunham and he was shamelessly writing about how he was stroking his little brother’s penis when his little brother was a child, he’d be crucified by the media right now.
the next great liberal rights movement in America? you guessed it; pedophile rights!
I bet if Lena Dunham was a republican or conservative the feminists would be screaming about child molestation.
I will admit that many kids are sexually curious-they want to know the differences etc but parents should set boundaries. Even children should respect that they don’t touch other people’s private areas. Her parents failed to set boundaries.
By the number – The economy was better in 2006 (GOP Control) than in 2014 (Democrat Control)
http://commoncts.blogspot.com/2014/11/friendly-reminder-economy-was-better-in.html
To me the very fact she won’t identify her rapist in her book makes her a terrible person. Who want’s to let a rapist run around free? Lena Dunham! The statute of limitations is still active but she won’t prosecute. What a terrible person!
Evan- I didn’t want to be the one to have to quote this but
““Grace had stuffed six or seven pebbles in there. . . . Grace cackled, thrilled that her prank had been such a success.”
She was hitting her sisters vag so often that leaving pebbles inside it was a prank.
That’s one twisted little girl. I’m glad my children are out of college.
Dunham entered into a twitter spiral of rage-venting concerning her “misinterpretation” of what she wrote in her autobiography. Fine.
Why would an autobiography include vagina monologues if the author were not, shall we say, fixated on her crotch? She really should get a gig in group therapy with Anthony Wiener go forth all Joan of Arc girded and introduce The Art and Wisdom of the Vagina to core curricula across the perverted plain.
OH, shattering of leftist mantra alert.
If all the left and the gays say you are born this way, how can you spin the fact that this broad’s sister was sexualized from when she was one and later in life she comes out as lesbian?
Isn’t it all the left screamed against? that you could not possibly become gay after being repeatedly sexually molested as a child?
I am confused, maybe evan can chime in being both gay and an expert on pedophilia.
One step forward the great walk towards the legalization of pedophilia comes closer. How soon the “you are on the wrong side of history” stickers?
Gee, you’d think that Lena’s curiosity might have been satisfied just by gazing upon her mom’s many photographs. She must have tired of it and sought younger flesh?
Or maybe she has merely always been weird.
$316 dollars a day for an illegal alien child to pet ducks, that money could be used to stuffy why lesbians are fat.
http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2014/10/31/california-illegal-alien-kids-living-the-good-life-on-us-taxpayer-dime/
” it costs anywhere from $250 to $1,000 a day to house just a single illegal immigrant child.”
I hate that so much comes out of my paycheck to pay for Laskankadank’s 21 illegitimate crack babies but at least they are US citizens.
Well, it’s like this. Dunham says she was 7 years old when she touched her sister. OK FINE. I *might* be able to let that go…I mean 7 year olds sometimes do things that they don’t know are either wrong or inappropriate.
HOWEVER…
The fact that she’s now a grown-ass woman, and writing in a *shameless manner* about what she did, changes my perspective on it. I mean, there are just certain things you never mention in public. This is definitely one of them. Either she’s a sicko or her parents didn’t teach her proper manners. I’m guessing the former.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2815055/Police-cap-arrests-Rochdale-sex-abuse-inquiry-Social-worker-whistleblower-says-dozens-offenders-streets.html
Lets hope bath house Barry doesn’t get the ideal to make cops arrest less blacks to change the crime statistics.
Interesting, that our resident paedophile hasn’t condemned this…
If the Dunham family lived nearby, I would throw a hissy fit about their “priorities” and make it clear to my children
Opps…. If the Dunham family had lived nearby, I would throw a hissy fit about their “priorities” and make it clear to my children that they were loons and to stay away from them. (Blockquote as above)
This is a fundamental moral issue of depravity on the hoof. The old man can sit in the basement and paint vaginas until his erection wears off. Momma can sit on her bed and admire her crotch using a multitude of mirrors. But when you choose to make your “art” a statement on your walls, you have made a clearly anti-social choice and you are in it for thrill of being provocative, self-loving and narcissistic. That is the only way you can gird yourself, psychologically, for the onslaught of criticism.
Neighbors, on the other hand would have every right to call the cops if either or both of these provocateurs ventured to do their sex stunts in broad daylight in their front yard.
The daughter, Lena, seems to be dissatisfied with the results of her “in your face” stunts and is going to keep at it until she goes nuts from depression or finally burns out Madonna-like and turns to writing children’s books.
Over at Stacy McCain:
Heliotrope, you had me at “lard laden”!
I seriously wonder if Ms. Dunham wasn’t molested herself.
After reading about her parents and seeing samples of her fathers paintings, I almost feel pity for Dunham. Her parents are batshit crazy.
Her parents are batshit crazy. I almost feel pity for her.
Her parents are loons. I almost feel pity for her.
Evan, Ms. Dunham herself is quoted as saying “…anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying.”
In other words, she herself appears to be saying that the actions of Prof. Humbert Humbert towards “Lolita” were no worse than anything that 5-year-old Dolores Haze might’ve done with a 5-year-old neighbor boy (“Okay, for a nickel and two jellybeans, I’ll pull down my panties, but you have to show me your thingy, too.”)
It is Lena Dunham, not pervy right-wingers, who wants to obscure the difference between child molestation and innocent “playing doctor” games among kids.
And — anticipating any objections about the symbolism of Lolita — yes, it IS a novel about a brilliantly erudite middle-aged pedophile who creepily rationalizes his seduction of a 12-year-old girl.
True, on certain levels you can ALSO read it as a metaphor about European moral decadence encountering American naiveté; and Nabokov himself, as an amateur linguist, partly considered the novel “my Valentine to English” (a language he greatly admired but did not speak with native fluency).
But, still, the novel is “about a pedophile and his pedophilia.”
Evan said: “If you read the original source material and find it and ascribe sexual motives to it, rather than the innocent curiosity of a young child”
Evan, what she did at 7 years old doesn’t make her an abuser. It’s her shameless attitude and her nonchalant and cavalier way of admitting, as an adult, about what she did that makes her an abuser.
of course the defenders cheer this so at least they’re consistantly inconsistent.