Mark Steyn explains why the hip Democrat Leftists who use “old white man” as a pejorative and swear they aren’t socialists… are suddenly excited about supporting a really old white Socialist for president.
Hillary, by contrast, is in trouble not because she’s a sleazy, corrupt, cronyist, money-laundering, Saud-kissing liar. Democrats have a strong stomach and boundless tolerance for all of that and wouldn’t care were it not for the fact that she’s a dud and a bore. A “Hillary rally” is a contradiction in terms: the thin, vetted crowd leave more demoralized and depressed than when they went in. To vote for Bernie is to be part of a romance, as it was with Obama. To vote for Hillary is to validate the Clintons’ indestructible sense of their own indispensability – and nothing else. Hillary is a wooden charmless stiff who supposedly has enough money to be carefully managed across the finish line. But that requires Democratic electors to agree to be managed, too, and the Sanders surge is a strong sign that, while they’re relaxed about voting for an unprincipled arrogant phony marinated in ever more malodorous and toxic corruption, they draw the line at such a tedious and charisma-free specimen thereof.
It’s a 2-3%er thing………no explanation needed…..
When 10-15% will vote in a primary, and far-less attend a caucus, that 2-3%er produce a lot of throw-weight. And MAYBE 40% will vote in the general election in November…
Judge Jeanine Pirro – Opening Statement – Sanctuary Cities , Kate Steinle – Fox News – July 11, 2015
http://commoncts.blogspot.com/2015/07/judge-jeanine-pirro-opening-statement.html
ps. Link Exchange with CC?
Bath House Barry sets free the crack fiends. While you can go into any gay club in DC or Miami and see a guy snort coke off the bar and dance all night, when someone does crack they usually end up punching a cop while too high for a police stun gun to affect like Rodney King. https://www.yahoo.com/politics/obama-to-free-dozens-of-inmates-tour-federal-123819896611.html
Assuming this is accurate, we are confronted with several presumptions.
Certainly the “authorities” are aware of this “fact.” That means the “authorities” have decided to treat the “fact” passively. The “authorities” have taken a passive role because they would rather have the “problem” localized rather than go “underground.”
Why is snorting coke off the bar in a gay club of higher public square tolerance than selling coke to passing clients in cars or on foot on a corner in the hood?
What compelling state interest permits drug use in a gay bar while disdaining the derelict crack house and the derelicts which frequent it?
To return to Steyn as quoted, I applaud his wordsmithing concerning the “Progressive” and general DemonizingRat voter:
The public square has been treated to a great moral inconsistency. An Occupy Wall Street rebel is applauded for taking a crap on a police car by the same folks who are fastidious about picking up their dog’s poop.
The rules are negotiable in sanctuary cities, for gays in their own caves, and waived for amoral Democrats engaging in immorality.
We are a two-tiered society. Victims get a pass and those who promote morality are predators.
Is everybody gonna keep ignoring that he’s not just “a White guy”, he’s a Jew? As if that has nothing to do with how he gets touted or not? C’mon boyz n girls. After all, what did Benjamin Disraeli write? “All is race. There is no other truth.”
My wife wants to know why there is not an Old White Women’s club. I explain to her that it would be unPC because females are a protected group and Hillary is an OWW!