GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Powered by Genesis

Progressive Democrat: Kill All Republicans

July 23, 2015 by V the K

A Progressive Democrat who was once Jimmy Carter’s deputy campaign manager in California offers his vision for achieving political change in the USA.

In my view, the animals need a massive depopulation of the human race.

It may come in revolution, in climate disasters, in pandemics. But it must come.

The Earth cannot survive the human race, which for all practical purposes is a parasitic life form which annihilates other species, pollutes the air and oceans, and is responsible for climate change and the next mass extinction of hundreds of thousands of species.

If it were up to me, we’d start by eliminating Republicans.

Hey, at least he’s not talking about cutting the Federal budget; that kind of talk would be radical and extreme.

Filed Under: Leftist Nutjobs

Comments

  1. davinci says

    July 24, 2015 at 12:01 am - July 24, 2015

    Geez, where have I heard this before. Can you say Mao, Joseph, Adolph, Fidel, Saddam, Pol Pot, Idi?

  2. rjligier says

    July 24, 2015 at 12:41 am - July 24, 2015

    2-3%er national socialists/communists are all alike, regardless of century.

  3. Blair Ivey says

    July 24, 2015 at 2:36 am - July 24, 2015

    Does it strike anybody else as strange that those least likely to own the means of destruction (firearms) are the ones calling for the elimination of those that are the most likely to own that means?Progressives are motivated by two factors: the desire for the control of others, and fear that the’ll be exposed while people still have the means to silence them.

    Those that desire freedom are losing, and without significant social upheaval, humanity isn’t going to make it.

  4. Heliotrope says

    July 24, 2015 at 8:58 am - July 24, 2015

    There is no such thing as “overpopulation.” In the study of ecology, populations are the result of the “carrying capacity” of the land.

    Not too long ago, the Washoe Indians objected to having a lagoon in Lake Tahoe named after Mark Twain. They wanted some Washoe name, but, unfortunately, their language is nearly dead and it was always an isolate language of tribal gibberish unrelated to other Indian languages. The Paiutes and Shoshoni drove the Washoe out of the valleys and up to the high mountains where they lived on roots, seeds, nuts, berries and scarce game and suffered the severe high mountain winters. They became a rag-tag group of diminishing survivors who drifted into dependence upon ranchers and then the government. Mark Twain did 10,000% more for putting Lake Tahoe on the map than anything any Washoe ever did.

    The point is that tougher Indians pushed the Washoe out of the productive land and into the “trash” land where the carrying capacity was meagre. So, the Washoe died off. They did not “overpopulate.” The land beat them like a drum. Snow fell, pines grew, rabbits hopped and mosquitoes bit.

    This Social Engineering genius who wants “a massive depopulation of the human race” is a certified fool. He says “the Earth cannot survive the human race.” Au contraire mon ignor-anus, the Earth always abides. When the carrying capacity no longer supports the human population, it will migrate, kill each other or decline naturally.

    The conceit that a Community Planner can outthink God in how this interdependent mechanism called the Planet Earth is organized is laughable. Maybe, if we all flap bedsheets at the Aurora Borealis and everyone marries a tree we could stop a tectonic plate from making a destructive shift. Maybe not.

  5. Bastiat Fan (@Bastiat_Admirer) says

    July 24, 2015 at 11:35 am - July 24, 2015

    Scratch a so-called “progressive,” find a murderous totalitarian.

  6. CthulhuDreaming says

    July 24, 2015 at 12:28 pm - July 24, 2015

    For people who die at the dogmatic altar of evolution, they sure do seem to think humans are not just animals themselves. Seriously, what is it that separates us from the beasts, in evolutionary terms? If they throw out self-awareness or some such then we are the superior life form, and under the premises of evolution we should be allowed to do precisely as we choose. I am all for debating what that choice ought to be, but calling for the elimination of an opposition sounds a bit like what mice would say about cats, not the other way around. I would rather be the cat.

  7. Steve says

    July 24, 2015 at 5:08 pm - July 24, 2015

    But who will do all the work? If you kill all the kulaks the monkeys will starve.

Categories

Archives