A former assistant principal, who was the state chairman for presidential candidate Martin O’Malley, and who most recently served as the vice-president of a Henrico-based financial firm, was arrested Thursday for possession of child pornography.
Michael C. Teegarden, 51, of Mechanicsville, was charged on two counts of child pornography after deputies executed a search warrant at his home in the 10000 block of Morning Dew Lane.
His penchant for pictures of little kids being raped puts him in the illustrious company of Virginia ACLU President Charles Rust-Tierney, Democrat Senate Aide Jeffrey P. Rosato, and San Francisco Gay Left icon Larry Brinkin.
HUNDREDS TURN OUT to Protest Obama in Oregon “Go Golf!”
http://commoncts.blogspot.com/2015/10/hundreds-turn-out-to-protest-obama-in.html
ps: Link Exchange with CC?
Yes, yes, I know; we’re never happier than when we catch the other side doing something awful, but remember one of these days it’s bound to happen to one of ours (neither side has a monopoly on, or control of, individual evil), and then we will be racing to claim we can’t judge all on the basis of one.
It only makes a difference if the other side KNEW he got off on little kids and still kept dealing with him. And proving that could be difficult. Until then we should contain our schadenfreude a little.
Perturbed, haven’t you noticed what the media does when there is even just a hint of scandal with a Republican. Blood in the water.
Perturbed the left embraces their worst. The c#nts crying about 14yo duggar playing doctor, cry out the Hispanic that raped an 8yo white girl to death in San Fran & caught on video tossing her body in a dumpster is too stupid to face consequences. If he was fired for being too stupid the EEOC would be after his employer because IQ only exists when the left faces consequences.
Leftists silent about 1700+ little white girls raped by moslems in Rotherham UK, but loudly supported the girl that said she was raped because she blew 24guys on video in a slut off contest only to find out the prize was a $8 drink
Mike stopped posting coincidence?
http://ktla.com/2015/10/08/man-who-calls-police-to-say-hes-too-high-found-in-pile-of-doritos/
@Steve
He seemed to have left after he realized he couldn’t convince me that he was possessed of godlike intelligence that needed worshipping just because he posted a bunch of junk surveys and biased news clippings, then was told to get bent. Would anyone object if I perchance painted that “kill” on the fuselage of my computer? 😛
Kilroy,
Please show where I ever posted a “junk” survey
Furthermore, the last time I conversed with you promised there are lots of respectable gun owners who are teaching and thinking up solutions on how to stop the illicit gun trade.
When I asked for some of those solutions you failed to deliver.
Yes, Mike, but none of those respectable gun owners are or ever will be supporters of Obama’s approach. What’s more, some of them are almost certainly gay, others black, others women, and some of them are probably all three.
The primary solution is to allow law-abiding men and women to defend themselves in a manner proportional to that in which they are likely to be attacked, and to punish severely those felons caught using illegal firearms. Constricting or removing the rights of those who have not harmed others is quite frankly evil.
mike…. I am a member of a grass roots gun rights group. We promote responsible private gun sales. ID your buyer. If the buyer is not a resident of our state or you are uncomfortable with the buyer, the sale goes through a gun dealer complete with a background check. If the buyer refuses, the sale is called off.
Now, two for you… If Obama truly wants to stop gun running, why does his Justice Department routinely lets gun runners off with light sentences? If an overwhelming number of mass shootings (almost 100%) happen in Gun Free Zones, why aren’t Gun Free Zones prohibited? Hint : The answer to both questions is the same.
” I am a member of a grass roots gun rights group. We promote responsible private gun sales. ID your buyer. If the buyer is not a resident of our state or you are uncomfortable with the buyer, the sale goes through a gun dealer complete with a background check. If the buyer refuses, the sale is called off.”
Great! Now if only all gun sellers were so scrupulous. However as we all know straw gun purchases are a plague on our society and voluntary regulations are not enough.
The only way to stop them is to regulate all private sales AND a national gun registry that starts from the manufacturer and ends with the buyer.
mike.. I will assume you didn’t answer my questions on purpose. Shame on you. Perhaps the Justice system should try enforcing current laws before creating new ones. So, you have the delusion that gang members in Chicago will show up at a police station and register their firearms? haha.. How would a national gun registry have stopped any of the mass killings in the last decade? How would a national gun registry stop any of the fire arms related suicides? How would a gun registry stop any of the gang violence in Chicago, Baltimore, Atlanta, Detroit and other liberal strongholds with burdensome gun regulations?
National gun registry failure : I have a gun. You want to buy my gun. I sell it to you at a BBQ. I report said gun stolen. Gun turns up at a crime scene. Now what? See a gun registry is a do-nothing feel good measure that can only accomplish two things… Discourage law abiding citizens from purchasing guns and government confiscation (see Katrina).
“How would a national gun registry have stopped any of the mass killings in the last decade?”
Its impossible to say, maybe all of them, maybe none of them. But that coupled with universal background checks on private and public sales AND if owners had greater responsibility if their guns are used in a crime, it would at least give law enforcement a chance.
RE your BBQ gun sale – yes you are right. If you go that route, its harder to track illicit sales. But if you do this multiple times, its likely the feds will be able to figure out what is going on and if the guy who you sold it to was able to prove it was purchased then you would go to jail and never be allowed to own a gun again.
“Constricting or removing the rights of those who have not harmed others is quite frankly evil.”
We do this every time we fly, everytime you protest, everytime we enter a sports stadium, everytime we enter a concert, every phone call you make, every email you send. Americans “rights” are being trampled on every day in the name of security. Why should guns be except?
mike, the difference is one of voluntary, partial, non-permanent surrender. Every time somebody walks about town without being armed they are, in essence, relinquishing their right to bear arms until such time as they do become armed. Those examples are merely cases where a good or service is disallowed without such relinquishment. Questions of legality of those cases aside, it is understood that upon leaving each of those sites of activity, those rights are able to reassert themselves immediately.
That is the opinion of the law on the matter.
To more accurately answer your question: our rights should not be trampled ever in the name of security. It was Ben Franklin who put it best “Those who would trade their liberty for their security deserve neither”. That our rights are so trampled in such scenarios is merely proof that humans are lazy creatures, content to watch as their world slowly falls apart.
Furthermore, guns contribute to a more secure society anyway. Aside from granting everybody the ability to fight back against existential threats, the ability to mutually wipe another from the face of the Earth and be wiped from the face of the Earth tends to make people a little more pleasant to one another. Mutually assured destruction worked for nations and the history of politeness in society indicates that the ability to forcibly remove another, when broadly available, tends to promote manners. So, we now have a polite society which is capable of answering any existential threat, including the immediate instances of an invasion by a foreign power, crazed gunmen, and tyrannical governments.
Finally, never put rights in quotes. It makes you look like a petulant four year old who is incapable of intelligent discourse as it implies that the mere idea of rights is preposterous. Learn why the bill of rights was put in place, and maybe you will begin to understand its import to some.
CD –
I am not saying you don’t have a right to be armed. However, you don’t have a right to buy an type of gun you want, and I don’t think asking legitimate law abiding citizens to be inconvenienced in the name of security is that big of a deal.
We inconvenience those who want to flex their 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th all the time.
Hmm, so Mike is for disallowing gay marriage. Who’d have thunk it?
Ahhh, my apologies, mike.
I got you mixed up with Kevin as both of you posted equally dubious materials and used many of the same arguments. 😛
You are again suggesting that the current state of affairs is indicative of a good precedent. Also, I do actually have the right to buy any type of not just gun, but armament, including nuclear warheads if I so choose.
“…the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
I would draw you attention to the last four words: SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. it cannot be any clearer that any infringement upon the right of the people to (a) form a militia, (b) maintain the security of the state, and (c) bear arms, not just guns–arms, is unconstitutional thereby making any such infringement illegal and an affront to the law of the land.
Our inconveniencing of the other rights, as you put it, is similarly contemptible. However, in some cases, those rights specify who shall not be doing the infringing. I cite the first and its specific mention of Congress not infringing.
If you wish to dispute the morality or ethics of that very clear and simple language, you may. But then you do not want to live in the US, and it is simpler for you to move to Australia or Sweden or wherever rather than bother everybody who actually like these things all the time.
You also fail to address my claims to the security of a state being increased with an armed citizenry. I shall now provide a historical example to draw your attention to it, as the claim, if true, undermines your entire position: Switzerland in, well, every war that has happened in Europe. From Napoleon to Hitler, the Swiss militia of privately armed citizens was a sufficient deterrent for crazed dictators to leave them well enough alone.
“Its impossible to say, maybe all of them, maybe none of them.”
The answer is none. They all bought guns with background checks and none of the guns were privately transferred. Fail. Useless feel good get out the votes from people who have irrational fears of guns. There are 300 million+ guns now that are not registered. A national registry is an exercise in futility. In states where certain types of guns are required to be registered, high estimates are that 5% of the guns get registered. The only way a registry will work is if law enforcement searches each and every home. The only way Universal Background Checks work is if there is a national registry. Therefore, can we assume you are willing to let law enforcement search your home at any time every year to verify that you don’t have guns in your home? If you don’t both a national registry and a system of UBC will fail.
Just admit that you want all guns confiscated except for the government and law enforcement. Otherwise, you are being disingenuous at best by stating otherwise.
” I don’t think asking legitimate law abiding citizens to be inconvenienced in the name of security is that big of a deal.” Yet, by your own admission, the inconvenience is not going to be successful in stopping mass shootings in Gun Free Zones. None of the so-called solutions you or Obama or Mrs. Clinton are putting forth would have had any effect on the mass shooting of the last decade.
CD – by that logic, its OK for people to have tanks in their backyard, nukes in their basement & warplanes in their driveway.
Any reasonable person knows thats not going to fly.
Therefore reasonable background checks, reasonable restrictions on the type of guys and reasonable restrictions on private sales should be OK too.
TnnsNe1 – Again, you are right, a registry won’t have an immediate impact. But we got to start somewhere. Overtime,through every gun made, every sale, every bequeathment we should have most of them.And you are right, it might not stop ALL mass shootings, but it will curtail the illicit arms trade in this country – which is a bigger problem than mass shooting.
“You also fail to address my claims to the security of a state being increased with an armed citizenry”
I have no problem with armed citizens. I care about stopping the illicit trade in guns.
Renaud Camus,(gay left author to right wing) was convicted of incitement to racial hatred last year for telling truth about moslems.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/09/right-wing-new-reactionaries-stir-up-trouble-among-french-intellectuals
don’t have a right to buy an type of gun you want
It just so happens I don’t have that right to buy a full auto pistol or a short barrel rifle. Why don’t we toss Holder in jail for gun running without tracking the guns? There is no reason for buying a gun to be more difficult than voting, with dead pets even voting democrat.
The only way to stop them is to put people like Holder in the ground.
We do this every time we fly Because looking at Russia’s naughty moslem list that had the boston marathon brothers (who also beheaded 3 gay jewish nextdoor neighbors) & the Obama son that targeted the Oregon College the French Train hero went to would be profiling. Chris Mintz who was shot 7 times trying to stop the Oregon moslem was a veteran, but Bath House Barry profiles white vets instead.
warplanes in their driveway. Any reasonable person knows thats not going to fly.
Just like there are Asians/whites that make guns in their garages having 80% build parties, there are also Asians/whites building experimental aircraft in their garages.
I’m glad we’ve established that mike, in addition to arguing against gay marriage feels that the restrictions advocated by the weimar republic are ‘Reasonable’
After all, nothing bad came from that…
I suppose I am not reasonable, as per your criteria. We come again to one of my earlier posts where we draw a line in the sand and those who think as I do sit on one side, you and yours on the other, and we see which society collapses first. Mine with it’s almost perfect anarchical governance or yours with whatever the details of political thoughts are.
The simplest solution to solving the illicit gun trade is to remove those conventions which make it illicit. Otherwise, we could adopt a policy which makes the illicit gun trade’s resultant problems nonexistent. Again, “an armed society is a polite society”, it would not matter how expansive the illicit gun market was if everybody had equal access at all times to equivalent or better arms than those found on the illicit market.
Once more with feeling: do you take issue with the legality of infringing at all upon the right to keep and bear arms or with the morality of the position? Your response indicates that you are incapable of processing the clear letter of the law on such matters, an opinion I will hold until you prove through sound logical reasoning that the second amendment is somehow opaque, therefore the issue must be a moral one. The solution is simple: draw a line.
Well considering how quick gay divorce law firms sprang up maybe gay divorce/alimony isn’t a great idea. I guess mike thinks that as long as jackboots are doing door to door raids looking for raw milk(instead of telling people only drink it if you k style evolved to drink milk) they can look for guns while they are at it. K style evolution lets you drink milk, & do math easier.
But I thought looking at naked pictures of children was a lifestyle choice that one ought to indulge. (src)
How did this post, once again, get derailed into a debate about guns? It has nothing to do with guns – it’s about a pedophile. Lots of examples of conservative pedophiles (mostly the Catholic Church), getting no sanctions, no jail, no scrutiny. Guess it veered to guns cause we conservatives can’t win on lefty’s cornering the market on pedophilia. This is so sad. Let’s take the splinter from our own eye first….
Hey look, the Chinese Communist is back!
@ The_Livewire, sorry to re-focus this on the “actual” posted story, I know it upsets your myopic world view. Call all the other trolls if you wish, I, as a gay conservative, refuse to be intimidated by your juvenile name calling.
“Overtime,through every gun made, every sale, every bequeathment we should have most of them.”
Nope… Unless law enforcement goes house to house searching for guns violating people’s 4th amendment rights (which to you is just a minor inconvenience) registration and therefore Universal Background Checks will never ever ever work.
“I care about stopping the illicit trade in guns.” Yet, you have not presented a way to stop illicit trade of guns. Gangbangers will not register their guns. Obama on the other hand has told his justice department to not be heavy handed with gun runner’s sentencing. Why is that?
“it might not stop ALL mass shootings, but it will curtail the illicit arms trade in this country – which is a bigger problem than mass shooting.” Again, if the mass shootings are all that the current anti-gunners are concerned with, why propose solutions that will not address mass shooting? The two things you propose will not stop suicides either. They won’t stop gang violence. So what good are they?
Are you willing to be inconvenienced (and give up your 4th amendment rights and possibly your 5th amendment rights) by having law enforcement come into your house unannounced periodically to search for unregistered firearms? Yes or No?
Name calling?
Why Kevin. I’m just calling you what you admitted, by your own standards, you are. It’s hardly my fault you showed you’re a Chinese Communist.
Well, and a troll, but you admitted you’re a Chinese Communist when you were shredded by Kilroy, and your only rebuttal was to say he was ‘working for the NRA’.
So, you foul mouthed Chinese Communist, I’m just holding you to your own standards. I understand, being a Chinese Communist, you’re not used to being held to the same standards you hold others. Consider this a learning experience.
“Harvard University Study Reveals Astonishing Link Between Firearms, Crime and Gun Control
According to a study in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, which cites the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the United Nations International Study on Firearms Regulation, the more guns a nation has, the less criminal activity.
Read more at http://www.beliefnet.com/News/Articles/Harvard-University-Study-Reveals-Astonishing-Link.aspx?p=2#9HbYcpMSpqHw72Rj.99
Oh no… Harvard.. Can’t dispute that can you?
“Over the past 20 years, gun sales have absolutely exploded, but homicides with firearms are down 39 percent during that time and “other crimes with firearms” are down 69 percent. 2 Almost every mass shooting that has occurred in the United States since 1950 has taken place in a state with strict gun control laws. With just one exception, every public mass shooting in the USA since at least 1950 has taken place where citizens are banned from carrying guns”
Whoops.. mike’s faulty logic is the product of agenda driven media propaganda.
@ Live-Wire, haha, you would be funny if not so incoherent. I gave up with Kilroy because he admitted he worked for the NRA, so no need to debate any further, dead-end debates are never fruitful for anyone. I am German/English in heritage, so “Chinese” was of your own making (trying hard not to call you names, but you should check that in your own posts). Can we keep this civil, honest, and factual?
Would this be an example of what the call, the alternative right?
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/09/right-wing-new-reactionaries-stir-up-trouble-among-french-intellectuals
Kevin… The NRA is a boogie man.. less than 7% of gun owners are members of the NRA. If a person worked for one of Nanny Bloomberg’s organizations would conversations with them be a “dead-end debates”? Try going on a Nanny Bloomberg FB page and question their “facts”. See how fast they ban you.
Kevin, by your standards, you work for the Chinese Communists. It’s ok, you admitted it in the other thread.
It’s ok, I mean first you tried to exploit the death of your nephew, then you were made a fool. It’s ok, your admission you work for the Chinese communists is refreshing.
TnnsNe1
For the last time I am uninterested in lowering gun ownership. All of the controls I have outlined are only to stop the rampant illicit gun trade in this country, yhe types of guns and ensuring mentally unstable & criminals can’t easily get them.. (However for your edification, that study uses poor comparisons and odd data, as most studies do they get reviewed and in this case that review showed why they got outlier data)
Cd
““an armed society is a polite society”
I have no interest in living in Yemen Guatemala or Pakistan where rule of law is enforced by the individual. I would not live in a place dedicated to vigilante justice
Further I am not 100% clear on your question please restate.
@ Live-Wire. you are a pathetic liar. It was not my nephew it was my niece, so if you want to reference a previous post you should get your f’n facts straight – so much for checking facts, you FUCKING looser. Gloves off dude. I am one of those 7% not a member of the NRA who owns guns (three actually). Like more than 70& of gun owners, I welcome increased scrutiny. This keeps my kids safer, and me too, but it will not be 100& certain, just better than now. I look for evidence of that. Can find some evidence in Australia. Cowboy culture. Had a mass shooting in 2006, changed their laws (people can still own guns), and have not had any notable incident again for almost 20 years. Not a perfect analog, but a place to start. Can’t stick to facts, I know, so this will be my last post to respond to a pathetic retard.
For the last time I am uninterested in lowering gun ownership” Then you contradict yourself by stating you want exclude certain people and certain types of guns. Which is it?
Who said you were? You are advocating for a gun registry. A gun registry can only be effective with household searches. Are you willing to submit to such searches or not?
It is a Harvard study using UN and Obama CDC numbers. Yet, you believe Nanny Bloomberg’s polls. Face it, you have been out “gunned” on this issue. Background checks already eliminate those who have been ajudicated as mentally ill. Again, without a national registry UBC are useless. Without household searches, a national registry is useless. Therefore, UBC are useless. If you are not willing to have your house searched you are a hypocrit.
So this thread is not about pedophilia, it’s about gun control. No wonder so many have abandoned this site, only the absolute crazies remain. I get it, shut it down by the republican right who don’t want a gay, right counterpoint and you eliminate one sector of opposition. I am DONE. Cheers from all I assume, except others who are gay and conservative and want to find positive solutions.
So this thread is not about pedophilia, it’s about gun control. No wonder so many have abandoned this site, only the absolute crazies remain. I get it, shut it down by the republican right who don’t want a gay, right counterpoint and you eliminate one sector of opposition. I am DONE. Cheers from all I assume, except others who are gay and conservative and want to find positive solutions.
Ah, the communist is upset at being held to his standards, and leaves, again.
This Kevin idiot just keeps saying Kilroy is an NRA shill when Kilroy only included that with a sarc tag for amusement…
As to the catholic crap, that got far more press, far more condemnation from conservatives, and a crap load of criticism heaped on the church. Also, the church has apologized and made whatever restitution they could and aren’t hiding them anymore.
If you don’t mind, we’d like to do the same thing here… WITHOUT having to deal with this liberal go-to argument over and over and over…
He has stomped off before promising not to come back, and yet he returns. This strange “conservative” who cheers for Australian-style gun confiscation and thinks Obama is a great patriot whose policies have made America better.
Kevin doesn’t want the fathers of little boys to have guns for obvious reasons. Its the same reason reporters didn’t want to tell people that small slim white male teens where being targeted by a black male rapist with a knife between when school let off and when parents got home. No jury in TX would convict a minor for shooting a black who raped him in the back.
http://www.vdare.com/posts/black-on-white-gay-rape-nicholas-stix-follows-up-the-associated-press
mike @ 38
I don’t know about Guatemala, but come to El Salvador where legally owning a gun is difficult. But in thw country smaller than L.A. County we are now up to 38 homocides a day ( I think we surpass Chicago); eightyfive persent are gang related. The remaining victims are bus drivers or small business owners who fail or refuse to pay extortion. I wish all you sensible gun control advocates would devise a plan to get the criminal element to voluntarily surrender their guns.
so, littlelettermike is not willing to his home searched for guns in order for a national registry to work. Why doesn’t he want to do his part to stop the killing? He must be a heartless person.
If you look back, it was mike who first brought up gun control on this thread.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/13/report-rep-sander-levin-aide-arrested-beating-lover-shovel/