This is a thing that’s going around. 
The implication is that Obama’s presidency has been bad for the Democratic Party. I guess you could make that case, kinda sorta. And since the Democratic Party threw themselves all-in to his Cult of Personality, it’s kind of Karmic that it would lead to their withering in state governments and Congress.
But I don’t think Obama or his Alinskyite backers care very much about states or legislatures. Obama has been spectacularly successful in centralizing autocratic power in the executive branch; aided and abetted by Republicans who are either too timid to oppose him or actively collaborating. Obama has unilaterally re-written welfare laws, immigration laws, environmental laws, and labor laws. His administration has imposed policies on the states ranging from dictating what school children may eat for lunch to how states may use natural resources. The Democrats may be losing power in the states and legislatures, but Obama has largely made them irrelevant.
not bad at all. Party insiders looted the federal treasury to levels never before dreamed of by greedy self-serving politicians. Previous generations needed to depend on bribes and phony book sales to generate a few million dollars. now they can get hundreds of millions pushed to their foundations (Billions in the case of the Clintons). Add to that the fact that the legislative landscape has dramatically changed and it is hard to say by any objective standard that Obama has not been a success.
Intelligent voters have spoken and their assesment is that Barak Obama and his policies are a dismal failure. Ironically, the sector that has been hurt the most will still vote for Democrats, the urban black community, whose adult unemploymernt is higher than the national average and black youth unemployment is virtually non-existent. Liberal single women will continue to respond to the cheerleading of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Harry Reid, and Hopeful Hillary, that there is a war on women and funding for Planned Parenthood must be preserved. Liberal white men need support to remove any religious symbols and eliminate God from our national conversation. Finally there is the liberal LGBT community who wants to shut down every business they perceive to be prejudiced by declaring their belief in traditional marriage.
I agree, V the K, with your assessment that Barack Obama has been successful in expanding the scope and intrusiveness of the central (it’s no longer just a federal) government. It’s all he and those who think like him need.
In order to avoid literal bloodshed, the states are going to have to get the power back into their hands, as was established in the Constitution.
The states are no longer significant in the New Order. Just lower administrative elements in the Federal hegemon. Been that way for a long time, actually. The sense of statehood that the Founders had is long dead.
The only issue that fundamentally counts, as Ms Coulter makes plain, is racial demographics. The only demographic that supports non-Democratic models of our fundamentally transformed future is White Gentiles. And only 60% of us are in that camp. Majorities and super-majorities of all other racial/ethnic groups are solidly behind the Great Replacement. Once we are below a certain level of the population, America is gone for good.
We will either wake up at a certain point and much nastiness and violence will ensue in another Civil War/Revolutio, leading to a separate country for us on this continent, or we will be reduced to peonage in a land that our ancestors created for us.