“If you see something, say something,” the Regime says. But when if someone “sees something” … say a Mohammedan carrying around something that looks like a bomb … and then says something… well, then they lash out with the fury of a million angry progressives for “profiling” and “racism.”
So, naturally…
By the way, have you noticed how all of the left-wingers who were saying all weekend that all Christians and Pro-Lifers everywhere were responsible for the Colorado shootings are now saying that it would be wrong to correlate this shooting with Islam because that would be hateful and bigoted?
I notice these things.
So, if you do notice Mohammedans behaving suspiciously, my recommendation is to not report them for planning jihad. Report that they are violating environmental laws and forming a Tea Party group. That will bring down the wrath of the Obama Regime in a hurry.
“have you noticed how all of the left-wingers who were saying all weekend that all Christians and Pro-Lifers everywhere were responsible for the Colorado shootings are now saying that it would be wrong to correlate this shooting with Islam because that would be hateful and bigoted”
I agree, the left needs to be just as outraged with Muslim terrorists as they are with Conservative Terrorists.
I think we can all agree that both should be stopped.
Some of the things we must do is outlaw guns like the AR-15 used in this attack on our country and increase surveillance on extremist groups. Unfortunately in today’s world the government needs to be able to track digital communications, monitor extreme groups and outlaw the tools these groups use to attack our country.
AR-15s cause very few deaths in this country, mike.
Typical leftist response: Punish innocent gun-owners because terrorists broke the law.
Not to mention, California already outlawed “assault” weapons like the AR-15.
Didn’t stop the terrorists, did it?
Idiot.
“Punish innocent gun-owners because terrorists broke the law.”
Punish? No.
Inconvenience, Yes.
Just like we all have huge amounts of checks at airports, sporting events and other mass events.
Your precious government can outlaw whatever they want, mikey. Whenever they want. But, what you and the rest of your Nazi friends don’t understand…someone will have to enforce the bans. So if you or your fellow Nazis want my weapons. Come and take them.
Amazing…astounding.
You can’t use the word “Islamic Terrorist” because that would cast aspersions on all Muslims…
But you CAN cast aspersions on all gun owners and the NRA despite the very clear overwhelming condemnation of lawful gun owners on these terrorist attacks.
CAIR, in a rare show of sanity, has condemned the act.
Little letter mike is clueless again… Mass shooters are 0.0004375% of gun owners. 80 million gun owners, 350 mass shootings as reported by mike’s anti-gun people (the number is complete fiction but I will use it to make him happy).
Maybe 5 mass shootings have used the type of weapon that mike wants to ban.
Under his “rules” if an SUV is used to murder someone (drunk driver) than all SUV’s should be banned. Gay couples won’t be happy.
I’m not a fan of the TSA either; complete waste of money. Arming flight crews was the better, cheaper option, but the Big Government anti-gun fanatics wouldn’t hear of it.
If mikey wants to strip law abiding citizens of their rights, I suggest he go first and shut up.
By his rules all men should be force to wear chastity cages because some men commit rape.
It’s not depriving you of your right to lawful sexual intercourse, it’s just “inconveniencing” you.
You don’t even need to arm and train flight crews. Just offer a nice discount to passengers who have a CCW and are carrying. The bad guys will never know when they’ll be shot in the back of the head for their antics.
As for the shrieks of “but CCW is dangerous!” show me the incidents of CCWs doing evil deets??
[crickets]
Show me how many mass shootings have taken place at gun ranges or NRA conventions.
Zero mass shootings at gun shows
Most mass shootings have been done in gun-free zones. Hmmmm.
@mike I loathed you before, and I think I loathe you even more now just because of how willfully ignorant you are. I work behind a gun counter every single day, and I CHALLENGE you to think of another casual sales position that requires daily use of FBI resources in order to make sure that criminals don’t get what we sell.
Every time I use the NICS system, I log onto the FBI servers and sign and agree that I’m not misusing it, or there’ll be bad times in the pipeline for me (paraphrasing, of course). This is the only job I’ve ever had where I had to take an online course about spotting suspicious people trying to purchase things from me, and that encourages sleuthlike powers of discernment concerning what are called “straw purchases”. Indeed, I’ve had to deny more than a few sales simply because I suspected that the customers weren’t being on the up-and-up with me.
Are you suggesting to me that there needs to be something MORE than talking with a federal agency every single time I sell someone a firearm? If so, I’d like to hear it. Because if you admit that the current system doesn’t work, you therefore have to admit that maybe, JUST MAYBE, the federal government isn’t half as competent as you leftist power-grabbers want to admit.
p.s. If you spout that “gun show loophole” lie at me, you will be promptly placed into the same mental grouping as small children and lapdogs.
More like, “CAIR, in an entirely typical show of elementary public-relations savvy, has condemned the act.”
On the other hand, it would be a rare thing indeed if CAIR identified the shooters as “radically heretical yet theologically sincere Muslims” — as opposed to “Nonononono, they’re not real Muslims at all.”
(Of course, to call them radically heretical would still be “telling a bit of a story / which oughtn’t diminish their glory” — but LESS so than pretending the killers acted entirely outside the pale of Qur’anic teaching and historic precedent.)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/12/02/the-san-bernardino-mass-shooting-is-the-second-today-and-the-355th-this-year/
Reziac @11: I like the way you think. You might be onto something there!
mike,
Spoken like a man who has never been stalked or harassed. A woman was killed recently by her ex-boyfriend (stabbed) while waiting for a gun permit. Kind of think she was more than inconvenienced. Sorry, but as a woman, I shouldn’t be able to be ‘inconvenienced” to level the playing field in self-defense. BTW, pipe bombs are completely illegal. http://freebeacon.com/issues/new-jersey-woman-stabbed-to-death-by-ex-while-waiting-for-gun-permit/
Q: What do you call someone who endorses every single word of the “Nicene Creed,” and blows up a Planned Parenthood clinic?
A: A Christian who makes Jesus weep.
Q: What do you call someone who endorses every single word of the “Shema Yisrael,” and scams tens of millions of dollars via criminal conspiracy and fraud?
A: A Jew who’s a total “Shande fur de Goyim”.
Q: What do you call someone who endorses every single word of the “Bismillah” (and recites it five times a day), and shoots 14 co-workers?
A: A non-Muslim with possible mental-health issues and excessively easy access to guns.
Throbert McGee.. you forgot workplace grudges
If Syed Farooq’s neighbor had called the cops (even anonymously) and reported the suspicious behavior, I suspect that the FBI would have tracked him down and arrested him for a hate crime, or for violating Syed’s civil rights.
And would the local police have done anything about it, anyway? And if they had, Syed would have sued them.
Sound far-fetched? Creepy Clock Boy is suing the school and/or police in Texas for “racial profiling.”
11.You don’t even need to arm and train flight crews. Just offer a nice discount to passengers who have a CCW and are carrying.
I guess you don’t know the cost of the Glaser ammo that could kill moslems but not cause depressurization if it hit a window.
16.CAIR, in a rare show of sanity, has condemned the act.
That’s funny I thought they just cried about not backlashing moslems
That’s the only thing that gives me pause about allowing firearms on an aircraft. An errant bullet or two can’t do much damage on a train (outside of human targets), but can really mess up everyone’s day on a metal/carbon-fiber tube 30,000 feet off the ground.