GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

2016 “Dangerous Faggot” of the Year: Milo Yiannopoulus

by

If you are not following this guy, you should be. His resolution for 2016 is Total War on the Social Justice Wankers.

It’s now clear that progressives, lecturing the rest of us on how we ought to live from their bully pulpits in the media, academia and the entertainment industry, are terrified of the internet and don’t want to know what we have to say. Well, tough. In 2016, it’s time for the counterculture to go to war. Over the past year, I’ve seen people from all over the world stand up and fight back against the authoritarian, censorious world being built around us.

From video games to reddit to college campuses, we’re beginning to realise that there are more of us than there are of them. Our YouTube videos get more views, our fundraisers smash their targets, our numbers on social media eclipse theirs. And by the way: we see your hypocrisy. Social justice is always a cover for something, as the endless queue of progressives who get busted for being sex pests or worse continues to grow.

The public is getting sick of nasty, spiteful rants from people who pretend that their objectives are nice-sounding things like “diversity” and “equality” but who are really just bullies.

Comments

  1. If there is any justice in the world, when Milo dies, the Catholic Church will make Milo the patron saint of homosexuals, gadflies, wanna-be Bond villains, and those who lust after well-endowed black men. 😉

    But honestly, it is so refreshing having a homosexual man defend economic conservatism and cultural libertarianism with the unflinching panache and withering contempt for the opposition that Milo displays. The fact that he is now the editor of Breitbart Tech smashes the Leftist narrative of the homophobic Right-wing movement into millions of pieces- or glitter, as the case may be.

    Milo Yiannopoulos: slayer of feminists, stirrer of feces, and launcher of a thousand memes.

  2. This was a GREAT rant! His use of the term “fag”, however, unnecessarily detracts and will cause too many to dismiss everything he said. I despise the PC culture and have been fighting back against it. But sometimes a little SELF-restraint is needed.

  3. Based on a gander of his twitter account (it takes five minutes just to go through the last couple days of tweets), he seems like a narcissistic polemicist who saw an exploitable niche and filled it. One of his latest tweets is a poll attacking feminism at the expense of cancer. I just visited a friend who probably considers herself a feminist (never asked, but I wouldn’t be surprised) and is going through radial therapy after finishing her chemo in November. I’m glad she is well and in recovery. This guy seems to lack perspective in his quest to make a living out of being a celebrity a@@hat. But, he’s on message, so I can see why he would be embraced at GP.

  4. @ Khiri: Yiannopoulos’ point is to counteract the PC notion that only certain people can say certain words. This is in reference to an article he wrote a few weeks back in which he bestowed “f-word privileges” upon all his straight readers.

    Yiannopoulos’ general thesis is that homosexuals, particularly gay men, have done themselves a disservice by hitching their star to the Leftist victim-bully culture, and wants to see gay men stand independent of any political faction’s agenda. He also believes that homosexual men are basically the designated culture-producing caste in Western Civilization, and that a lack of attraction to women should not be an excuse to not pass on one’s genes and help the flagging population of the West.

  8. Instructive:

    http://www.rawstory.com/2015/10/comedian-explodes-on-self-loathing-gay-conservative-who-wants-to-be-straight-face-it-you-are-gay-as-fck/

    “If I could choose, I wouldn’t be a homosexual,” Yiannopoulos said. “That doesn’t make me self-loathing.”

    “You don’t think it makes you self-loathing to hate a part of what you are?” Rogan asked.

    Yiannopoulos said he didn’t hate himself, but thinks he would be “even better” if he could not be gay.

    Rogan then asked Yiannopoulos if he would be willing to cure himself of homosexuality if such a thing was ever invented.

    “Well, it would be career suicide, but I probably would, yeah,” Yiannopoulos said.

  12. So, Vince is saying that Nero must hate himself because, given a choice, he’d rather be straight than gay. Would Nero also say that Bruce Jenner must have hated himself?

  13. I just spent Christmas with one of the most politically incorrect rifle-loving rednecks, and we got along splendidly, so I find your opinions of who you think I actually am … amusing.

  14. Would Nero also say that Bruce Jenner must have hated himself?

    I’m unsure as to why you would bring up Jenner in the context of Nero, when Jenner isn’t gay. Nero thinks that Jenner is a man. Jenner has sexual relationships with women. So, Nero wouldn’t consider Jenner gay.

  15. Let’s put this in perspective: a guy who uses one of the most loathed phrases of 2014 in his online handle has celebrity-envy of one of the Right’s newest, brightest, and most fabulous rising stars.

  16. I stand by my initial assessment. When a truly fabulous star with conservative values breaks out, I’ll be there cheering him/her on. But, if you want this wanker, have at him.

    *shrug*

  18. Let’s put this in perspective: a guy who uses one of the most loathed phrases of 2014 in his online handle has celebrity-envy of one of the Right’s newest, brightest, and most fabulous rising stars.

    At the risk of using another cliche, “Boom!”

  19. At the risk of using another cliche, “Boom!”

    More like “pfft” after all the superficial attempts to box me in with the SJWs, as well as this nonsensical question:

    Would Nero also say that Bruce Jenner must have hated himself?

    The standard for “Boom!” here is so very low, lol.

  21. If one fail at depicting someone as something they’re not based on flawed reasoning, throw out an irrelevant question betraying an ignorance (while not owning up to it), and then cheer on someone you think is clever … you’re losing an argument.

  25. […] that a lack of attraction to women should not be an excuse to not pass on one’s genes and help the flagging population of the West.

    Oh Lord, I do hope he’s not yet another advocate of designer children.

  26. @ RSG: Not necessarily. Milo wrote an article a while back in which he wrote that, since the gay liberation movement, gay men and lesbians are no longer obligated to take wives or husbands to save face in public. He compared this to the coarsening of Western culture, and wondered if the removal of homosexual men (who tend to have higher-than-average IQs) from the gene pool by cultural convention has somehow contributed to the dumbing-down of the West that we are witnessing.

    If I’ve read him correctly, Milo’s greatest fear is the rising tide of Islamism, which is being fueled in part by the fact that Muslims, especially those who have immigrated to Western countries, are flat-out outbreeding the native Westerners; and if the West is to survive, it needs to increase its birthrate. I don’t think Milo’s for couples sitting down and picking out their kid’s entire genome, but I do think he perceives this as an all-hands-on-deck demographic emergency, and that he wouldn’t be overly upset at the notion of a male couple seeking the services of surrogate mothers to produce their own biological children.

  28. Sean, I think we agree basically. I’m just a little more emphatic.

    Sean L: “But honestly, it is so refreshing having a homosexual man defend economic conservatism and cultural libertarianism with the unflinching panache and withering contempt for the opposition that Milo displays.”

    Sean, are you actually implying that “unflinching panache and withering contempt” ever come from other than “a homosexual man” ?

    Sean L: “He also believes that homosexual men are basically the designated culture-producing caste in Western Civilization,…”

    And they need to get off of the coffee break and back on the job.

  29. Being one of Milo’s “disciples”, I find him to be a bit heavy on the self-worship (I suspect some of that is a running gag – see Limbaugh) and he occasionally provides TMI but, on balance, he’s indispensable.

    The SJWs have claimed too many victims to not be engaged – ruthlessly. Milo relishes these battles and he’s willing to “go to the mattresses” (Godfather, not handsome black men) to win. He’s fantastic on telly – very fast on his feet with well-thought argument.

    Too many on the right don’t want to seem “not respectable” which is why, for example, George W Bush left unanswered slanders against our military by loathsome scum like Dick Durbin (he called them Nazis). If I’d been commander-in-chief, I’d have given a lot of thought to pistols at dawn.

    The left plays to win regardless of the costs. Scorched earth is just another day at the office. If we are to preserve our “right to be left alone”; if we are to have a peaceful society where people live-and-let-live, we need to engage on their terms.

    I think it was Lenin who said “You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you”.

    PS: Milo, if you see this, your dark hair was hot. Bring it back!

  30. 2.This was a GREAT rant! His use of the term “fag”, however, unnecessarily detracts and will cause too many to dismiss everything he said.

    If you really want to clutch your pearls go over to Vox Day and see what the KoranBurningFaggot has to say.

    27.Why does Milo think that most homosexual men have higher than average IQs?

    I would say he hasn’t talked to many gay men, but his personal twitter account “Caligula” shows he gets around

  31. Sean L.: Thanks for the elucidation/clarification on that. I surmised that is what I thought he was essentially saying. The issue I have with those who seem to believe that any long-term problem can or might be overcome by breeding our way out of it is that the process tends to be less like craps and more like roulette: children are like a box of chocolates—you never know what you’re going to get.

    Additionally, you always get the less-than-optimal people doing the breeding (cf, Ricky Martin). Add to that people like Adam Gadahn, and I would say we will be much better off nipping most of the problems in the bud than attempting to breed like-minded responses.