A Protester Calling Itself “Mama Nanny Cat Dog” Thinks Gun Owners Are Crazy.
Kathy Witkowski-Jacobs, a self-identified “hippie” from Arlington who requested to be referred to as “Mama Nanny Cat Dog,” was the lone protestor to show up outside the store. At her feet was a plate of food somebody at NOVA Armory had brought out for her.
“First of all, I think anybody that has a gun needs to get their head examined like we get our eyes checked every year,” she said. “Those that have guns need to get regular yearly check-ups because look at the monster that went into Newtown and annihilated all those babies. It’s not the guns, it’s the gun owners who are unstable.”
She said she knew that there were a lot of gun owners who are stable but she wants all gun owners to undergo yearly psychological evaluations to figure out which ones aren’t. When asked why she opposed the opening of NOVA Armory in particular she said, “Well, there’s guns in there. I don’t want any gun stores. I don’t want any gun stores.”
Also, in an editorial, Hillary Rodham Clinton unveils the key points of her Gun Control Agenda, which lines up well with the “I don’t want any gun stores” view of Mama Nanny Cat Dog.
1. Repeal the law that protects firearms companies from nuisance lawsuits so the Left can sue them out of business.
2. Abolish the law that requires the Federal Government to approve or deny gun sales within 3 days of a background check, so that the Government can deny gun purchases by sitting on background checks indefinitely.
3. Use the arbitrary and inaccurate “No Fly” list as a basis for denying citizens their right to self-defense.
Mama Nanny Cat Dog would approve. And then she would do the ritual interpretive dance that protects her from the mind-rays of the banana people.
Yeah, someone needs to point out to Mama Nanny Cat Dog that the Newtown shooter did not own guns. He stole them. From his mother. After he killed her. Without a gun.
I wonder if she would agree to the same rules for parents? In Maine, parents are harming or killing their children at an alarming rate.
She has no clue… How would this even be possible for the estimated 82+ million gun owners of which their no comprehensive records of gun owners. They government would have go door-to-door and search.
These people are so juvenile. Too bad we can’t impose the same restrictions on voters.
Seems like a great idea. I propose we start a pilot program of annual psych testing of all police and armed federal agents. We can use that data to see if it is worth testing everyone.
Yeah, some whacked-out hippie calling herself Mama Nanny Cat Dog is obviously well qualified to judge the mental stability of gun owners.
Of course, it’s already illegal for psychotics to own guns, but the leftists want to expand the definition of “mental illness,” making it so broad and vague that it can mean anything they want. So the government’s own in-house shrinks can conduct those annual psychiatric check-ups, and can diagnose you as psychotic because you want to own a gun in the first place. In the liberal world view, gun ownership is itself a symptom of anti-social tendencies.
And, when W. was in office, leftists denounced the Terror Watch List, and its subset, the No-Fly List. The Atlantic, the New York Times, and the ACLU all pointed out (with considerable justification) that there were no objective criteria, and that anyone could be placed on the list for no reason, without evidence. And that names remained on the list even after the suspects had been investigated and exonerated.
Now, with Obama in office, the lists can be used to promote The Agenda. So Progressives have learned to Stop Worrying and Love the List.
BTW, Tashfeen Malik and Syed Farook were never on the No-Fly List, or any other anti-terror watch list. (Not surprising, really. Obama has, in effect, ordered the FBI and DHS not to spy on Muslims.) So the Obama and/or Clinton proposal (prohibit gun sales to anyone on the No-Fly List) would not have prevented the San Bernardino massacre. Trump’s proposal (ban Muslim immigration) would have.
Batmerdercrazy 2%ers assault on the COTUS and the Bill of Rights because we all know batmerdecrazy 2%ers do not to engage in violent criminal and borderline confrontational behavior or attempt to attribute their batmerdecrazy behavior to the majority normal heterosexual population.
Oh, and as an aside, I assume you have heard about the Transsexual who was assaulted in New York City?
Yup. At the Stonewall Inn.
I will leave it up to you what this means.
Yet when you say voting should have the same requirements sh!tlibs want for guns they cry racism.
Well, if you say voting should have the same requirements as buying a six pack of beer, libs cry racism.
Oookay, anytime someone refers to sentient beings who are able to dress and feed themselves without assistance and who are fully ambulatory as “babies” you know they are simply being emotional without any rational or logical thought. (As well as card-carrying members of the What About The Chilllldren? Club.)
Sometimes I wonder if one of these shooters with the evil guns went into a senior center at lunchtime to do their deed if the response from the gun-grabbers would be the same. Or would it be a case of “Eh, it was their time to go, anyway.”
Only if Mama Nanny Cat Dog agrees to mandatory yearly psychological evaluations for liberals.
^ Yearly? Surely you jest! Even monthly isn’t too often.