GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Powered by Genesis

Douchiness Knows No Gender

April 13, 2016 by V the K

This columnist may be confused but hyx gender, but no one else can doubt what an obnoxious douche-canoe hyx is.

The year: 2005. The city: New York. The place: a nice restaurant — the kind with bathroom attendants who hand you a towel after you finish your business. I was having dinner with some LGBT colleagues when I excused myself and headed to the facilities — one labeled for men, the other for women, facing each other across a small hallway. Between them stood an employee, who looked me up and down and opened the men’s room door for me.

How polite? Hardly. Instead of thanking him, I explained how presumptuous he had been in deciding my bathroom preference for me. I tried in vain to explain how “gender identity” (the way individuals perceive themselves) is different from “biological sex” (generally indicated by a person’s genitalia, or sex assigned at birth).

Apparently, delivering lectures to working class people for being insufficiently PC is the very definition of Civility to the Gay Left.

To normal folks, it’s just obnoxious.

Seriously, any pretentious twit who sees an act of politeness as an opportunity to lecture on political correctness (thereby signaling their PC superiority) is a douchenozzle. Full stop.

If any social juicebox wanker asks me (as they are taught to ask) “What pronoun should I use for you?” My response will be, “How dare you! I refuse to let you objectify me and deny my humanity be reducing me to a pronoun in service of some political agenda. It’s degrading and dehumanizing and I refuse to participate.”

Filed Under: Gay PC Silliness

Comments

  1. Ted B. (Charging Rhino) says

    April 13, 2016 at 4:00 pm - April 13, 2016

    My preferred pronoun-for of address from wait-staff is, “Yes, Mi’Lord. Of course, Mi’Lord! A thousand-pardons, Mi’Lord…. This way, Mi’Lord”. …Along with some appropriate groveling and requisite scraping.

    Though typically I find a bathroom attendant annoying — unless he’s humpy, naked, and his collar is chained to the wall while awaiting my convenience…

    Do people still use the adjective “humpy” for guys?

  2. tommy651 says

    April 13, 2016 at 4:04 pm - April 13, 2016

    I don’t understand how anyone can support putting young girls at risk of perverts to satisfy these people except communists. what did these people do for the couple of hundred years we have had toilets? all of a sudden they need to use the girls room. I think this is the leftist cause turmoil strategy.

  3. Peter Hughes says

    April 13, 2016 at 4:14 pm - April 13, 2016

    Do people still use the adjective “humpy” for guys?

    Yes – if the guy in question is J.J. Watt. *DROOL* 😉

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  4. Ilion says

    April 13, 2016 at 4:56 pm - April 13, 2016

    “How dare you! I refuse to let you objectify me and deny my humanity be reducing me to a pronoun in service of some political agenda. It’s degrading and dehumanizing and I refuse to participate.”

    That’s why I refuse to use the word “gay” (except with ironic/mocking quote marks) to refer to persons afflicted with homosexual desire — that usage of “gay” was invented and is promoted to further a political agenda.

  5. Hanover says

    April 13, 2016 at 5:19 pm - April 13, 2016

    Being gay isn’t an affliction. The usage of the word gay to refer to gays isn’t a political agenda.

  6. Sandra says

    April 13, 2016 at 7:38 pm - April 13, 2016

    I always believe in being polite so I always use the genderless designation of a-hole or a-hat for liberals.

  7. Craig Smith says

    April 13, 2016 at 8:01 pm - April 13, 2016

    Hanover, any time a biological function does something other than it’s biological intention, it is an affliction, such as, say, sickle-cell anemia, which makes a person more resistant to malaria, but has side effects that, in a malaria-free world, can obviously be considered an affliction.

    It cannot be denied that the biological function of sexual desire is reproduction. When that desire is towards something that will not result in reproduction, that can be considered an affliction, even if benign.

    There are plenty of afflictions which can be considered benign and are not treated unless they interfere with other more important functions. I, for one, am afflicted with skin tags. However, no doctor will treat them unless I ask them to, and no insurance will cover the removal, since they are considered benign. They are still an affliction.

    But, yes, the use of the word “gay” *is* a political agenda, intended to remove the negative connotation that accompanies the word “homosexual”, just as “african-american” now supercedes “black” which superceded “colored” which superceded “negro”, each of which was abandoned when they grew accepted and then used by people in a negative manner.

    Even now, when someone says that something is “gay” it is getting a negative connotation. Do not be surprised if the word gets replaced yet again.

  8. KCRob says

    April 13, 2016 at 8:29 pm - April 13, 2016

    @1: Ted – wish I’d said that.

  9. Hanover says

    April 13, 2016 at 8:40 pm - April 13, 2016

    Craig, I don’t have conversations with & won’t be lectured to by those that consider their natural sexual orientation as an affliction, compare it to skin tags or who are subject to self-loathing & need therapy of some kind, away from those of us who are secure in our own natures. … & no, the word gay has no political agenda, never really did when it was first coined years ago as just an easier & just less technical label for some people. Whatever its original intention, by multiple sources; it’s long since lost any political coloring whatsoever.
    I don’t care who or what Ilion is or its intentions, which are unverifiable at this point.

  10. Craig Smith says

    April 13, 2016 at 8:44 pm - April 13, 2016

    With regard to gender, when the sex of the person is not clear, I use the pronouns they/their/them which has a history going back to Chaucer. I am not about to learn a new list of pronouns to refer to less than 1% of the population.

  11. tnnsne1 says

    April 13, 2016 at 8:45 pm - April 13, 2016

    Call me gay, call me a f@g just don’t call me a puzzy

  12. rusty says

    April 13, 2016 at 8:50 pm - April 13, 2016

    Congrats to Bruce and his partner on their Gay Wedding

  13. TheQuietMan says

    April 13, 2016 at 9:03 pm - April 13, 2016

    I’m not a fan of the use of “gay” for homosexuals, or even its more restrictive meaning of male homosexuals, on linguistic terms. Gay used to mean, and still does although most people don’t know it, light-hardheartedly cheerful. There is no word to replace that.

    But going back to the article, bursting into a lecture as a response to a polite gesture is massively rude and shouldn’t be done. I would be embarrassed to be seen in the company of someone who would do that.

  14. Craig Smith says

    April 13, 2016 at 9:16 pm - April 13, 2016

    And Hanover is a mild example of the college students who need safe spaces, because they don’t want to be confronted with an opposing point of view.

  15. Sean L says

    April 13, 2016 at 9:34 pm - April 13, 2016

    You know who else doesn’t care about your gender identity? Polar bears. Because to them, meat is meat. So would you rather deal with us, who don’t really care about your gender identity but won’t do you physical harm, or take your chances with the polar bears on some inhospitable spit of land north of Canada?

  16. Steve says

    April 13, 2016 at 11:24 pm - April 13, 2016

    Yet again the gay stereotype of proving your manliness by being mean to the wait staff.

    “2.I don’t understand how anyone can support putting young girls at risk”

    You see if not for this the left would have to go after the Soros 1%.

    While one gay cake goes unbaked, or one man in a wig is denied access to the little girls bathroom, the leftist fight against the 1% can wait.

  17. Steve says

    April 13, 2016 at 11:27 pm - April 13, 2016

    I shall have to write Big Gay Steve’s Guide To Dealing With Petulant Puffs.

    Chapter One: How To Bitchslap Without Leaving Marks. Don’t date more than one guy named Mark at a time, you are better off single than in a bad relationship.

  18. perturbed says

    April 14, 2016 at 2:27 am - April 14, 2016

    “What pronoun…”

    Correct reply: “What do I look like?”

  19. Ilíon says

    April 17, 2016 at 8:18 am - April 17, 2016

    Hanover: “Craig, I don’t have conversations with & won’t be lectured to by those that consider their natural sexual orientation as an affliction, compare it to skin tags or who are subject to self-loathing & need therapy of some kind, away from those of us who are secure in our own natures. [blah, blah, blah]”

    Translation: I am a proto-crybully. I am so insecure in my unnatural “natural” sexual orientation that the mere mention of the fact that sexual desire is naturally oriented toward reproduction requires me to seek my fainting couch, as though I were a Victorian maiden (except for the chastity, of course). I demand my safe-space!

    Hanover: “The usage of the word gay to refer to gays isn’t a political agenda.
    … & no, the word gay has no political agenda, never really did …
    ”

    Riiiiiiiiight! That’s why pre-pubescent boys need to be labeled “gay” as soon as possible, as just one example. That’s why the hero-worship of an older-than-himself (youngish) adult-man-not-his father (that is, the transfer of his natural hero-worship from his father to another man, generally closer to himself in age) that almost every boy goes through has to be re-interpreted as “I was always sexually attracted to men”.

  20. RSG says

    April 18, 2016 at 10:36 am - April 18, 2016

    “What pronoun…”

    Correct reply: “What do I look like?”

    Comment by perturbed — April 14, 2016 @ 2:27 am – April 14, 2016

    Oh no, you never ask that question; lest you get trapped—and ensnare someone else—in a real-life version of It’s Pat!. (Thus proving that comedy is occasionally oddly prescient.)

  21. RSG says

    April 18, 2016 at 10:42 am - April 18, 2016

    […] the fact that sexual desire is naturally oriented toward reproduction […]

    It’s only natural for some individuals. As a male with a same-gender attraction, I have no desire to reproduce with anyone, much less a man. And yet I still have sexual desire.

  22. Ilíon says

    April 18, 2016 at 11:58 am - April 18, 2016

    ^ In other words, your sexual desire is un-natural.

Categories

Archives