Gay Patriot Header Image

A Feminist Offers an Opposing Viewpoint

Posted by V the K at 9:18 pm - June 1, 2016.
Filed under: Unhinged Liberals

This is a feminist protesting an appearance of Milo Yiannopoulus at the University of California – Los Angeles. Note: This is one of the people who currently set the norms and standards for how society ought to be operated, and whose whims and prerogatives must be accommodated by institutions and made into law by Governments. These are the people who demand “Affirmative Consent Laws” and for the denial of due process to men accused of rapes – positions fully adopted and embraced by the Democrat Party.

YouTube Preview Image

But at least she’s not calling for reducing the Federal budget to affordable levels, that would make her a dangerous radical whackobird.

More enlightened progressive responses here.



  1. You know, there really comes a point when your world view and philosophy with your fellow citizen surpasses difference of opinion, strong disagreement, and even bitter opposition. There’s a point when your moral and philosophical disagreements with another citizen becomes so great that it becomes impossible to mentally place them in the “countryman” category, where they cease to be one of your “people,” and whether they prosper or wither, live or die, ceases to be of concern to you.

    This creature and all her ilk have squarely crossed that line in my book.

    Comment by Sean L — June 1, 2016 @ 10:39 pm - June 1, 2016

  2. I just see a spoiled child having a tantrum.

    Comment by Conservative guy — June 1, 2016 @ 11:22 pm - June 1, 2016

  3. These are the people who demand “Affirmative Consent Laws” and for the denial of due process to men accused of rapes – positions fully adopted and embraced by the Democrat Party.

    Unless the accused happens to be named William Jefferson Clinton (or one of a few other names); in which case, ‘due process’ means never having to be held accountable for your alleged crimes so long as you can write checks for the correct amounts.

    Comment by RSG — June 2, 2016 @ 12:27 am - June 2, 2016

  4. I hope there’s a bubble one day where many of these universities close down, and only the best and the brightest can get into college.

    Comment by Joe — June 2, 2016 @ 6:05 am - June 2, 2016

  5. Her parents must be so-proud. And their pockets are much-lighter in-the-process.

    Taser. Pepper spray. Fire Hose. Repeat.

    …In a sensible country, rifle-butts applied with enthusiasm are an effective corrective.

    Maybe Mao was right to rusticate an entire generation to the rice paddies, mines and lumber camps. At a certain point, you just have to hit-the-reset and start-over again.

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — June 2, 2016 @ 7:19 am - June 2, 2016

  6. @ Joe, I think were at that point with the bubble at least

    Comment by James — June 2, 2016 @ 8:28 am - June 2, 2016

  7. In an earlier time, the men in the white coats would have been summoned to have her evaluated for mental treatment. Still needed.

    Comment by TheQuietMan — June 2, 2016 @ 8:32 am - June 2, 2016

  8. These people do not want social justice, they want to have a cleansed society that is aligned with their schismatic decrees. Through the marvels of consensus approbation, they are able to rule on who is authentically tolerant, what is affirmatively diverse, who is genuinely feminist, what is incontestably just, and who is unambiguously dangerous to the genuine and righteous culture.

    To argue with these fascists is to beg for their absolutist response.

    The fact that they cower together in colleges and erect “safe space” walls around themselves is a clear warning that this segment of society is rigidly judgmental in terms and conditions for offering aide, kindness, felicity, decency and respect to others.

    They are zealously committed to alienating those they scorn and to exacting their price in revenge.

    When people like these campus fascists join with the Kelvin is Lord Church of Everything Can Be Measured, they group like lemmings and run for the cliffs without any doubt that their organization and numbers create a consensus of validity and that their unity is therefore obliterating entropy. Entropy, according to Lord Kelvin, is disorder and randomness which screws up predictability and leads to chaos. Socialists are inherently obsessed with systems which organize and channel and unify and follow the disambiguation rules of a properly ordered society. These people are oblivious to the fact that their obsession with hyper-regulation creates a degenerating, degrading process which fosters decline, deterioration, chaos and collapse.

    Remarkably, Lord Kelvin threw in the towel when it came to the origin of life on a newly formed planet. He arrived at this anti-entropy conclusion:

    But overpoweringly strong proofs of intelligent and benevolent design lie all round us, and if ever perplexities, whether metaphysical or scientific, turn us away from them for a time, they come back upon us with irresistible force, showing to us through nature the influence of a free will, and teaching us that all living beings depend on one ever-acting Creator and Ruler.

    Oh, gosh. The immeasurable old metaphysical, free-will thing has broken out of the barn once again. Apparently, all things can not be measured and precisely ordered. If you are a dedicated socialist, that sucks. So, as a dedicated socialist, you must grab hold of religion by the throat and contain it.

    Iceland has a clever little zinger in its tax system. The government supports the Lutheran State Church and “recognizes” a very few other churches. Citizens are required by law to contribute a “congregation tax” to the officially recognized religious organization of their “choice” or to pay the contribution to the state as a direct tax which is shielded from being further taxed under the income tax scheme. The point is that “democratic socialism” is always on guard where freedom of religion might break out and start conflicting with the whole process of state engineered social justice.

    Social warriors have to engage in the unending battle against competing sources of morality and ethics such as religion, free-will and libertarianism. After all, if you have socially engineered the system, you can not permit the system to be subject to free will or ambiguity.

    Liberals will organize and herd the sheeple by use of the iron hand of government force and coercion. Conservatives want to keep the state out of their lives to the greatest practical extent. Conservatives know that every law and regulation constrains freedom and we must always fight for as much liberty as is practical.

    Milo Yiannopoulus is as threatening to the fascist of today’s universities as Dietrich Bonhoeffer was when he stood up to the Nazi bureaucracy and would not go along with their state church scheme to shut him up. In Bonhoeffer’s words: “The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world that it leaves to its children.”

    I doubt Milo Yiannopoulus has actively embraced Dietrich Bonhoeffer, but they are on the exact same mission. They are speaking truth to power and taking themselves into the belly of the beast.

    The little YouTube snippets posted above clearly show the bankruptcy of these petty tyrants. Their hissy-fits are embarrassing and would be cause for introspection if they were not so emboldened by their surrounding numbers of like-minded, impetuous and brash naifs.

    “Freedom is not empowerment. Empowerment is what the Serbs have in Bosnia. Anybody can grab a gun and be empowered. It’s not entitlement. An entitlement is what people on welfare get, and how free are they? It’s not an endlessly expanding list of rights — the “right” to education, the “right” to health care, the “right” to food and housing. That’s not freedom, that’s dependency. Those aren’t rights, those are the rations of slavery — hay and a barn for human cattle.
    ― P.J. O’Rourke, Cato Institute address, May 6, 1993.

    Comment by Heliotrope — June 2, 2016 @ 9:00 am - June 2, 2016

  9. Why were they chanting, “Throw us against the gate”?

    Comment by tnnsne1 — June 2, 2016 @ 1:00 pm - June 2, 2016

  10. Paul Joseph Watson make have figured it out. Funny but naughty words.

    Comment by KCRob — June 2, 2016 @ 1:06 pm - June 2, 2016

  11. That poor trash can! All it was trying to do was mind its own business and make an honest living…

    Perhaps I should write my dissertation on how that woman’s maniacal scream represented the epitome of the oppressed soul of each radical feminist confronted with the utter destruction of their “safe space” by “the Patriarchy”. That topic would seem to be on par with many of the dissertations coming out of the Academy at the present time. I would have no problem defending that!

    Comment by B. Long — June 2, 2016 @ 3:56 pm - June 2, 2016

  12. Speaking of progressive spoiled brat feminazis….

    She’s just prostituting herself for the cause, that is pathetic.

    Comment by Joe — June 3, 2016 @ 8:00 am - June 3, 2016

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.