GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Powered by Genesis

Yup, Perfectly Normal

June 10, 2016 by V the K

TLC has a show, apparently (I don’t have cable) called “I Am Jazz” that attempts to show how normal and healthy it is to be a transgender teen: “Normal and healthy” defined as “addicted to anti-depressants, emotionally unstable and generating massive drama for everyone around you.”

Mom (to Grandmother): So I have to stop at the drug store to get this medicine as soon as possible, because she told me this morning, ‘Oh mom, I’m out of my antidepressants’.

Jazz: Sucks to think that I have to rely on medications to be emotionally balanced. My body is crap, and I feel it.

Mom (to camera): It’s very, very clear when Jazz is not herself. She…it’s like a light switch…she turns off and she turns on. Between the drugs that are given to her, and the side effects and the depression that she battles, she’s predictably unpredictable.

Hmmm, maybe giving massive amounts of hormones and psychoactive pharmaceuticals to mentally unstable adolescents is not such a good idea.

If Jazz is upset now, wait until Jazz finds out normal straight teenage boys are just not into “girls” with penises.

I guess teaching people to love and accept the bodies they are born with is just not an option.

Hat Tip: Papa Giorgio

Filed Under: Annoying Celebrities

Comments

  1. Throbert McGee says

    June 10, 2016 at 5:44 pm - June 10, 2016

    wait until Jazz finds out normal straight teenage boys are into “girls” with penises

    not

    (Um, I don’t mean “NOT!” in a sarcastic ’90s-retro way. I mean, here is the character string missing from the above sentence, typed out for VtK’s convenience, and you’re welcome.)

  2. KCRob says

    June 10, 2016 at 5:57 pm - June 10, 2016

    Since the 50s and 60s, society has been doing an awful lot of human experimentation: what happens when you eliminate fathers? What happens when you treat boyhood as a disorder in need of treatment?

    What happens when kids live in transient households where they’re one place on these weekend, another on other weekends? What happens when we make marriage just another word without meaning?

    What happens when children, from infancy on, are raised in institutional environments where “mom” is an employee? What happens when “self-esteem” depends on being praised for drawing breath? What happens when genes and chromosomes are just another social construct?

    What happens when tradition, good manners, and taboos are discarded with nary a though given as to how these things *evolved* in the first place?

    So far, most of these experiments have been failures (by failure, I mean leaving mountains of broken and unhappy people) yet we continue to go on… it’s as if we don’t learn from our failures.

    Paul Joseph Watson has one idea that makes sense:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUhc3Kv4ieE

    (Naughty words!)

  3. frizzled says

    June 10, 2016 at 6:12 pm - June 10, 2016

    “Transgender” is gay genocide. These “transgender kids” are simply effeminate gay boys and tomboy girls with homophobic parents. This is child abuse pure and simple. Iran does just the same thing to gay men: forces them into “sex changes”.

    Gays should be screaming at Pride to “Drop the T”. We are in a period of cultural insanity…

  4. Craig Smith says

    June 10, 2016 at 7:47 pm - June 10, 2016

    frizzled……I…..don’t…..even……*sigh*

  5. Conservative guy says

    June 10, 2016 at 8:01 pm - June 10, 2016

    “Straight guys just can’t get over you having the male parts.”

    Yeah, who would have guessed?

  6. Joe says

    June 10, 2016 at 9:45 pm - June 10, 2016

    I’m surprised they haven’t approached Chaz Bono yet for a reality show. It seems trans is the hottest trend in today’s f’ed pop culture.

  7. Pawfurbear says

    June 10, 2016 at 9:59 pm - June 10, 2016

    Wow, I really like the honesty and integrity of the blogs on this site, way to go! You’re not the typical mainstream cuck-servatives.

  8. Ted B. (Charging Rhino) says

    June 10, 2016 at 10:45 pm - June 10, 2016

    Maybe it’s no-wonder that more and more High School and College guys are going-Gay and schtumpting guys right-off-the-bat, and want NOTHING to do-with the female-of-the-species under any circumstances.

    Soon, sensible middle-American parents will be actively-encouraging their sons to date their male friends instead; just to avoid these drama-queens, micro-agressive victims and toxic psycho-sexual female predators.

  9. Craig Smith says

    June 11, 2016 at 2:46 am - June 11, 2016

    From The Weekly Standard:

    Which brings us to the final bit of confusion in the transgender project. At the heart of the bathroom issue is a simple question: Is there a valid reason for separate facilities for men and women? Is there any rational justification for having separate bathrooms, or locker rooms, or changing rooms, for men and boys on the one hand, and women and girls on the other?

    The trans argument, per the Charlotte Observer, is essentially “no.” By their logic, if women just need to get over their discomfort at seeing naked men next to them, then there’s no reasonable explanation for why women could want their own facilities.

    Except that this would mean there is no reasonable explanation for why someone who is transgender should prefer one set of facilities over another. If biologically born women need to “overcome discomfort” about having naked men around them, why shouldn’t a biological man who identifies as a woman not similarly have to overcome his discomfort at being around other naked men?

    The logical paradox of the transgender bathroom war is that it insists that the type of gender and genitalia in a public facility is completely irrelevant—except to the transgendered, for whom it is of supreme importance.

    At the end of the day, if you’re not in favor of unisex facilities for all—one bathroom for everyone to use—then the transgender case falls apart. Because the transgender project tacitly admits that there are reasons of privacy, modesty, and prudence for segregating the sexes. It merely wishes to trump these concerns from the vast majority for the special pleading of a small, powerful, and illiberal group.

    It is the very definition of the tyranny of the minority.

  10. Sean L says

    June 11, 2016 at 12:22 pm - June 11, 2016

    @ Ted B.: Do you think feminists realize that their shenanigans threatens to make all women irrelevant? If they continue their nonsense, men may very well decide that they have nothing to gain by dating and marrying women. If a man wants sexual gratification, he can ask a male friend to aid him. If he wants children, he can adopt. And if he wants biological children, he can procure those via in vitro methods. And I’m willing to be that within a couple decades, feminist demands to totally divorce reproduction from their bodies will result in artificial wombs, at which point women will be superfluous. And then women would have to embrace “backwards” attitudes about the role of women (i.e., she is expected to be faithful to her future or current husband, she cannot falsely accuse him of abuse, etc.), or face societal and biological irrelevance.

    I don’t think we would see a homosexual paradise anytime soon, though. There’s still too much of a hangup about it in certain segments of the population.

  11. North Dallas Thirty says

    June 11, 2016 at 1:44 pm - June 11, 2016

    I’m surprised they haven’t approached Chaz Bono yet for a reality show. It seems trans is the hottest trend in today’s f’ed pop culture.

    Comment by Joe — June 10, 2016 @ 9:45 pm – June 10, 2016

    Propagandists want sympathetic characters that can play on peoples’ sympathy, empathy and whatnot to manipulate opinion.

    Chaz Bono is anything but.

  12. Craig Smith says

    June 11, 2016 at 1:46 pm - June 11, 2016

    Ted and Sean,

    Give Larry Niven’s “A World Out Of Time” a read. He postulates that when heterosexuality does not unite the two sexes together, they will separate completely, and be at each other’s throats, simply because it requires pain, heartache, and effort to maintain a heterosexual relationship.

    Also, look a bit deeper into the bowels of the LGBT community. The only thing uniting it is the common “enemy” of straight society. As that gets stripped away, why should any of them have anything to do with the other? There is a very strong undercurrent of misogyny among many gays (I honestly get hints of it in both of your postings) and misandry among lesbians (listen to any women’s studies professor). And both don’t really care for those who are Bi, since they see them as being unable to make up their minds or fraternizing with the enemy. And the anti-trans current inside gays and lesbians? Even they are aghast at the bathroom issue.

    It seems none of the 2-3% see just how stabilizing the majority of the heterosexual society is.

  13. Sean L says

    June 11, 2016 at 3:04 pm - June 11, 2016

    @ Craig Smith: If I came off as misogynistic, that was not my intent. My ire is reserved towards those women who seek to propagate the misandry that is third-wave feminism, and those who use the legal rights that are given them to mistreat and destroy men- the Crystal Magnums and Wendy Davises of the world.

    The “Macedonian Solution,” as I call it, isn’t impossible, but very unlikely. Far more likely- and preferable, from a social perspective- is that women abandon feminism, and there are growing evidence that a growing majority of women are doing so. Feminism, like many 20th century causes, is starting to encounter the law of diminishing returns, and people are realizing that the cost is too high. While the idea of men forsaking women and turning to their fellow men for romantic companionship obviously holds a certain appeal to a homosexual man, it’s simply not feasible, and despite advances in reproductive technology, not sustainable.

    When I wonder aloud if feminists ever stop to wonder if they are working towards the irrelevance of the female sex, I do so more as a commentary on their lack of self-reflection. Not once have I read a third-wave feminist wonder if their actions are counter-productive or even harmful to their cause. They just assume that men will accept their outrageous demands without protest or backlash, and that sane women will go along with the madness.

  14. tnnsne1 says

    June 11, 2016 at 9:53 pm - June 11, 2016

    This person isn’t old enough to legally drink a beer because society says a beer is physically harmful to a person of young age. Now, which is actually more harmful, a beer or hormone therapy with the required mood altering drugs?

  15. CrayCrayPatriot says

    June 12, 2016 at 3:23 am - June 12, 2016

    The U.S.’s relationship with alcohol is long and … different from a lot of other first-world countries.

    But, then, the brain isn’t fully formed until 25 years of age. So, there’s that.

  16. tnnsne1 says

    June 12, 2016 at 6:51 am - June 12, 2016

    Cray..Thank you for admitting that people under the age of 26 are not capable of making life altering decisions to change their bodies. You are the exoert, we will bow to your edicts. Allowing “children” under the age of 26 to alter their bodies with hormones and surgery (including tattoos and piercings) should be illegal.

  17. CrayCrayPatriot says

    June 13, 2016 at 3:43 am - June 13, 2016

    lol, I’m not an expert. But, I imagine there would be instances where there are people who would know well before age 25 if they are in the correct body or not. And, then, there is a grey area where a good chunk of people would fall. I also don’t agree with the emphasis on changing ones body, when that is just a small portion of being trans.

Categories

Archives