This is floating around the social media. It might explain the Obama Administration’s fierce determination to separate the Orlando Disco Massacre from Islam-Inspired-Terror, even to the extent of censoring the 911-call transcripts.
I checked in on MSNBC earlier today where the thrust of discussion seems to be centering around whether or not the Orlando shooting was an act of terrorism or a hate crime.
Wasting a moments breathe debating which term is the most politically correct way to respond to an attack on U.S. soil should seem ridiculous to any serious thinking person.
However, for leftists these distinctions are critical.
What exactly is the difference between an act of terrorism and a hate crime?
The answer is simple.
- A terrorist attack is an act of war which demands a forceful retaliation against enemy combatants.
- Hate crimes are a legal weapon created by Cultural Marxists specifically to attack Americans with traditional views.
Defining the Orlanda attack as the latter vs the former allows Obama to pivot the retaliation away from ISIS and back to his political opponents..
Discuss.
This is it exactly… Given the blunders of the FBI in this case, it was almost as if Obama wanted this too happen.
Kill black people in a church…. bad but is not going to trigger lots of gun control.
Kill gay people in a disco…. perfection for expanding gun control.
Terrorism, by definition, is designed to cause terror. Why? So the organization that sponsors the terrorism can obtain submission to their demands. If this act causes this administration to avoid calling it terrorism, in order to appease ISIS, who has taken responsibility for the act, then it is, by definition, an act of terror, which Obama admitted, sponsored by ISIS which Obama has NOT admitted.
If, however, it is a hate crime, it is NOT an act of terror, because terror is not the objective.
Rhetorical question of the day: If Omar Mateen had called 911 during his murder spree and pledged allegiance to the NRA or to Pat Robertson, would the Obama administration have been so eager for edits?
*Drops mic*
Regards,
Peter H.
Like attempted to pass-off the Fort Hood Jihadist as “just another workplace shooting”, classifying Orlando as a hate crime makes it merely-criminal, and “…the perp is already deceased, so what’s the bother all about?” An ‘act of terror’ requires a more robust response beyond just a judicial-reflection-in-hindsight. An ‘act of war’ can’t be ignored, nor swept under the Oval Office rug.
Point to ponder: Can anyone produce a photo of either of Mateen’s wives wearing a hijab?
Would millions of people be calling for a war on the entire Christianity, blocking off Christians from entering the country, would a presidential candidate be echoing these sentiments, etc?
That was also rhetorical. Because, no.
Pound to ponder, can Vince make a relevant comment?
“Would millions of people be calling for a war on the entire NRA and gun rights advocates?”
He didn’t mention the NRA and that is already happening….
In Maine, you can be refused service at a restaurant if you “think” owning a semi-automatic rifle is okay.
I mentioned this a few threads down, but in the now-released transcript, the English “prophet of God” is used as a translation for rasuul Allah, a stock Arabic phrase for Muhammad.
I would also surmise that in this line…
…the second “omitted” was a reference to ISIS or some other terrorist group, but the first “omitted” referred to Muhammad. (But this is merely a guess.)
The Obama Administration has been assiduously shifting the language away from Islamic extremism in myriad ways. Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) is a prime example.
As usual, Rush Limbaugh cuts to the chase and explains what is actually going on in the CVE charade.
Orwell said that language makes humans easy to control—control their language and you control the people. Thus the eradication of some of Mateen’s words in the 911 calls allows the government to manipulate the language, the context and the meaning.
The fact that Muslims get to “vet” the FBI for involvement in investigations of Muslims should be a big red flag to everyone. But, no. The “Republicans” in Congress are in line to vote in CVE money and tacit approval of its Orwellian machinations.
Actually, because yes.
The LGBT community and all its supporters have already declared a war on gun owners and are stating all NRA members are terrorists.
The Democrat Party is supporting and endorsing these attacks on the NRA and its members and is insisting that the NRA represents terrorists.
And Hillary Clinton, the Democrat Party Presidential candidate, says Republicans are terrorists.
So as we see, CrayCray, you and your LGBT community and your Hillary and your Obama are slandering hundreds of millions of law-abiding people to disarm them, strip them of rights, and protect Islamist terrorists.
But you don’t care, because you are a fascist like your Democrat Party and think you can impose your will on freedom-loving people by your imbecile child Obama berating us.
#11 – Epic takedown of al-Cray-da, NDT. Kudos! 🙂
Regards,
Peter H.
I would tend to not believe a component of the quotation, about cultural marxists creating hate crime laws. Which were not created by the marxists, but rather the enacted by Federal & local govts in response to pressure by the gay mafia, with the intent by the latter to receive special treatment even though existing law protects the gays, except in being fired by an employer for being perceived as gay or expelled from a rental for being gay.
Also, Obama isn’t that cryptic. It’s not about ISIS or his opponents. It’s still all about Obama’s inability to see Islaaaam for what it is, because of his affinity, membership or willful policy.
Actually, Obama has been “blocking off Christians” (and Yazidis) from entering the US, while increasing Muslim immigration.
And it sure feels like the Democrats and their propaganda arm (aka the mainstream media) have declared war on gun owners and Christians.
And Mateen was taken off the Terrorist List – or whatever it’s called this week – because the FBI decided that the complaints and testimony of his co-workers was caused by prejudice against his religion, not because he was a murderous … ahem … doing and saying the bad things the co-workers alleged. And what other law enforcement organization would do that? And why did the FBI? Because the FBI has a Muslim watchdog inhouse to tell them what to do with Muslims who are suspected. Do I have a link? No, but that’s the best second-order inference from the events that occurred.
It’s quite obvious to us all that something is amiss. When Milo Yiannopoulos visited Orlando last week, he spoke quite candidly about what is going on in Europe and has warned us that the same thing will happen here if Islamic jihadists are not kept out of our country; still the Obama Administration refuses to acknowledge that Islam’s ideology is at the basis of the terrorism that is going on in the world today. When Yiannopoulos visited Orlando, his speech at a college was cancelled because the powers that be did not want to upset the sensibilities of Muslims; so then his speech was given the next day near the Pulse Club. Now the DOJ is apparently censoring the findings of the FBI? What happened to the “transparency” that Loretta Lynch promised regarding the investigation of this case?
Yes, if said Christians had a significant population of people that demanded Sharia and were ready and willing to kill those that disagreed.
With the obligatory disclaimer that most Muslim are salt o’ the earth people and all that, tell me, CrayCray, what benefits to the nation to we enjoy by importing millions of people from incompatible cultures to the west? Feel free to use Google/Bing etc for research.
If the gov’t is going to start redacting stuff like this, I propose that they start using the terms “Dark Lord”, “he who must not be named”, “you know who”, “Death Eaters”, and the like.
I mean if they’re going to indulge in fairy tale fantasy, may as well have some fun with it.
It’s that or realize that our rulers are not only utterly unserious about immigration and related issues, they’re actively working to destroy the society. There is no other logical explanation.
“If at first you don’t secede, try, try again.” – Florence King
I am supposed they didn’t change the entire message of the call like they did when they edited out the reason George Zimmerman called for a guy casing houses, & the operator asking if the guy was white, black or Hispanic?
“I shot them because of Brexit white privilege NRA tranny bathroom law” Actually that’s all been suggested in the news recently.
“Indeed. A Muslim Democrat walks into a gay bar and murders 49 people”
He shot 102, and 4 are still in critical condition.
Afghani moslem walks into a gay bar
Bartender says “what would you like”
Moslem says “shots for everyone”
Ludenpress reports “STR8 WHite Church Going Christian NRA man shouts For the tranny bathroom law”
Considering the Leftists’ knee-jerk affinity for burdensome regulations imposed on businesses; I’m surprised no-one has called for bullet-resistant toilet stalls and ballistic-proof bathroom walls and doors. …Just like when you make a deposit at the bank.
As to his wives not wearing hijab: all sins are forgiven in the commission of jihad.