Gay Patriot Header Image

Love Is Love Update

Posted by V the K at 8:46 am - August 10, 2016.
Filed under: Gay Marriage

Once again, the Christian White Heteronormative Patriarchy is oppressing two people who just want to love each other.

A mother and son whose forbidden love affair could land them each a lengthy jail sentence have declared they are ‘madly in love’ and nothing will tear them apart.

Monica Mares, 36, and her son Caleb Peterson, 19, face up to 18 months in prison if found guilty of incest at a trial later this year in New Mexico.

But the mother and son couple have vowed to fight for their right to have a sexual relationship and are appealing to the public to donate to their legal fund.

Can you believe that The Patriarchy actually wants to put them in jail for being in love? Probably because of Thoecracy and stuff. “Government everywhere but in our bedrooms, yo!”

By the way, First cousin marriage is common and encouraged in Islam (which explains a lot about the Middle East), and since Mohammedans are the Democrats new favorite demo, it’s just a matter of time before all of those silly laws against incest will have to be struck down anyway.

Share

6 Comments

  1. You’re joking right? You think that they should be allowed to get married?

    Comment by James — August 10, 2016 @ 10:57 am - August 10, 2016

  2. […] story via GAY PATRIOT and his very humorous way to bring to light the deeper issue at hand, we find another example of […]

    Pingback by If “Love is Love” … Then… | Religio-Political Talk (RPT) — August 10, 2016 @ 2:10 pm - August 10, 2016

  3. Incest is gaining legality in the “enlightened world. The link takes you to an overview of the incest between a Columbia U. professor and his consenting daughter.

    The end of the link notes where incest is “accepted.”

    Comment by Heliotrope — August 10, 2016 @ 7:08 pm - August 10, 2016

  4. Civil marriage has been reduced to the contractual equivalent of a travel pass from a vending machine for the average urban transit system, so why not mother-and-son or father-and-daughter or grandfather and grandson? All that really matters is if they love each other, as we’ve been repeatedly told since same-gender marriage became a cause célèbre for well over a decade now.

    Comment by RSG — August 11, 2016 @ 1:54 am - August 11, 2016

  5. Civil marriage has been reduced to the contractual equivalent of a travel pass from a vending machine for the average urban transit system, so why not mother-and-son or father-and-daughter or grandfather and grandson? …

    One of the main “arguments” advanced (and endorsed by the leftists of the supreme Court) to impose the same-sex mirage regime upon an unwilling nation had to do with the “unfairness” of actually married persons exercising the right to avoid estate (death) taxes when one member of the couple dies and the survivor becomes the sole owner of the join assets as compared to the estate (death) taxes assessed upon assets of the deceased of two persons who “love one another” but are not actually married, due to that being a logical impossibility, when the one dies and the other wishes to inherit his assets.

    That pointed out — in the not-too-distant future, the leftists will be agitating to repeal the “unfair” laws that affirm the right of the survivor of a marriage to inherit without tax penalty the full asserts of the couple. I mean, really! think about how unfair it is that Thurston Howell III can avoid paying “his fair share” when he pass all his wealth to Thurston Howell V simply because they are “married”!!1!

    Comment by Ilíon — August 11, 2016 @ 9:33 am - August 11, 2016

  6. … though, oddly, if Joseph Kennedy III “marries” Joseph Kennedy V so as to avoid death taxes, that’s like, totally “fair”.

    Comment by Ilíon — August 11, 2016 @ 9:35 am - August 11, 2016

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.